MAC OS X: Forum

bootcamp, win XP and GPU performance

COW Forums : Apple OS X

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
Faryar9bootcamp, win XP and GPU performance
by on Apr 16, 2007 at 8:03:29 pm

I just read that using the BOOTCAMP partition on macbnook pro AND WIN XP
The GPU is not enabled...undeo win xp
The intent is to run AVID LIQUID Pro , a very GPU intensive progreamme..
Can any one verify this and possible performance issues for editinga dn gaming people?

thanks
faryar


Return to posts index

Jeff CarpenterRe: bootcamp, win XP and GPU performance
by on Apr 16, 2007 at 10:48:22 pm

You're thinking of 'Parallels' which is a program that allows you to run Windows inside of OS X. Graphics performance on that is very low.

But Boot Camp allows you to restart the computer as a total Windows machine. No issues there...Windows has no idea it's on a Mac. You get full hardware performance.


Return to posts index

Faryar9Re: bootcamp, win XP and GPU performance
by on Apr 18, 2007 at 3:52:07 am

I refer you to what drew my Question about The GPU not being enabled under BOOTCAMP and the Bios it presumably uses..

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/03/22/mac_fastest_core_duo_laptop/
Apple MacBook Pro 'fastest Windows XP notebook'
By Tony Smith [More by this author]
22nd March 2006 15:41 GMT
Click here to receive the Reg Hardware newsletter Want the fastest Windows XP Core Duo notebook? Then buy a Mac. According to benchmarks carried out by website GearLog, Apple's MacBook Pro running Windows XP is a better Adobe Photoshop rig than any other Core Duo laptop on the market.

GearLog's test results can be found here. The site used a recently detailed technique that shoehorns the Microsoft operating system onto Intel-based Macs - a trick that last week won its formulators $13,000 in prize money.


The site measured the 2.16GHz Core Duo-based MacBook Pro running through a series of Windows XP-native Photoshop CS2 scripts in 1m 10s - better than a 1.66GHz Core Duo-based Mac Mini (1m 56s) and a 2GHz Core Duo-based iMac (1m 25s). You'd expect that kind of difference given the different CPU speed grades.

However, the site links to a set of tests carried out by PC Magazine on an array of Wintel Core Duo notebooks from Dell, Lenovo, Acer and Gateway. Only one came close: the Acer, with a score of 1m 11s; the others generated scores of 1m 52s to 1m 55s, all slower than the iMac.

The iMac comparison is apposite because all the laptops tested had 2GHz Core Duo CPUs, just like the iMac. So did the Acer, which came in a nose of beating the 2.16GHz MacBook Pro. However, while the Acer has the same ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 GPU as the MacBook Pro, the GPU isn't fully enabled on the Apple machine under Windows XP.

We are confident that the MacBook Pro will lose its Windows XP Photoshop CS2 benchmark crown as more Core Duo machines are tested, particularly those based on the 2.16GHz T2600 CPU. But it will make for an interesting race, especially ifsomeone gets the Windows XP ATI drivers to operate correctly with the MacBook Pro.


Return to posts index

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
© 2017 CreativeCOW.net All Rights Reserved
[TOP]