ADOBE AFTER EFFECTS: Forum Expressions Tutorials Creative Cloud

Q9550 or i3 2120?

COW Forums : Adobe After Effects

<< PREVIOUS   •   FAQ   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
vince jack
Q9550 or i3 2120?
on Feb 11, 2013 at 1:25:40 am

which is best on the 2 proc for AE?
considering, same specs with other parts
(ddr3 modules, GPU, HDD, etc.)


Return to posts index

Angelo Lorenzo
Re: Q9550 or i3 2120?
on Feb 11, 2013 at 4:22:33 am

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/50?vs=289

Benchmark with the Q9550 and i3 2100. The 2120 will be a few mHz faster. As you can see the 2100 performs better overall. The video benchmarking does improve ever so slightly with the Q9550, but considering the 2120's speed improvement, it might become even.

The i3 uses a DMI instead of a separate front side bus, so you should see overall performance gains just from the architecture.

--------------------
Angelo Lorenzo

Need to encode ProRes on your Windows PC?
Introducing ProRes Helper, an awesome little app that makes it possible
Fallen Empire Digital Production Services - Los Angeles
RED transcoding, on-set DIT, and RED Epic rental services
Fallen Empire - The Blog
A blog dedicated to filmmaking, the RED workflow, and DIT tips and tricks


Return to posts index

vince jack
Re: Q9550 or i3 2120?
on Feb 11, 2013 at 4:37:27 am

so an I3 2120 would be the best choice? i was thinking that a 4 physical core ( for Q9550 ) would be more efficient than a 2 core + 2 thread ( i3 2120 ). any thoughts with this? sorry for a bad english


Return to posts index


Angelo Lorenzo
Re: Q9550 or i3 2120?
on Feb 11, 2013 at 6:55:12 pm

The Q9550 is older and uses a different architecture than the i3. It's difficult to make a direct comparison unless you look at benchmarking.

With that said, you should base After Effects multiprocessing off of physical cores. with the Q9550 you may be able to set multi processing to 2, but with the i3 you would be limited to one core (might as well disable multicore). How much RAM you have may actually be the deciding factor in optimizing that along with what effects you use.

AE multiprocessing tends to be buggy or counter productive when using any time remapping or noise reduction; using effects that reference or calculate off the results of other frames. AE multiprocessing, in some instances may be slower than allowing the CPU to use all the power on a single frame at a time... really depends on what you're working on as well.

--------------------
Angelo Lorenzo

Need to encode ProRes on your Windows PC?
Introducing ProRes Helper, an awesome little app that makes it possible
Fallen Empire Digital Production Services - Los Angeles
RED transcoding, on-set DIT, and RED Epic rental services
Fallen Empire - The Blog
A blog dedicated to filmmaking, the RED workflow, and DIT tips and tricks


Return to posts index

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
© 2017 CreativeCOW.net All Rights Reserved
[TOP]