AVID: Avid Editing Forum Avid Editing Tutorials

Re: Importing DNxHD from Blackmagic Cinema Camera

COW Forums : Avid Media Composer

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Shane Ross
Re: Importing DNxHD from Blackmagic Cinema Camera
on Jul 15, 2013 at 5:37:39 pm

Avid loves and craves MXF files. Sure, QT might work OK, but MXF is better. What I'd do is use AMA to access the media, then CONSOLIDATE to my media drives. This doesn't re-encode it, what this does it remove it from the QT wrapper and put it into an MXF wrapper. It's as fast as copying the media from one drive to the next.

And you'd DARN BETTER want two sets of your media! ALWAYS have media backed up. At least twice, if not three times. NEVER EVER EVER work from your originals, unless you are in NEWS and the pressure is on. If you lose your hard drive, and it does happen, a lot, then your media is gone...all of it. That that is disasterous. Typical field workflow for tapeless is to back up the camera media TWICE...two two different hard drives. Send one back to post, keep one on location. Some even copy to three hard drives. Back in post, you import/consolidate into the system, and then either shelve that drive, or copy the media to a final shelf storage option (I do two copies of this, two drives), and then send the field drive back for re-use.

If you want, you can copy the QT files to your media drive, and then AMA and edit with the QT. It should work fine, albeit possibly a touch slower than if you worked with MXF files. But the more AMA footage you add and edit with, the more it taxes the system. MXF in the Avid media file structure is always the best. You can AMA and start editing, but then when you go home for the night, set the system to consolidate.

Shane
Little Frog Post
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def


Posts IndexRead Thread 


Current Message Thread:





© 2019 CreativeCOW.net All Rights Reserved
[TOP]