APPLE FINAL CUT PRO: Apple Final Cut Pro X FCPX Debates FCP Legacy FCP Tutorials

Re: 10.3.2 Is out - WOW review from a huge X facility in Europe.

COW Forums : Apple Final Cut Pro X Debates

Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread

Walter Soyka
Re: 10.3.2 Is out - WOW review from a huge X facility in Europe.
on Jan 21, 2017 at 3:55:04 am

[Bill Davis] "Which is wonderful if you want to source everything from that one service. My clients tend to cast a much wider net for the right image. "

With Adobe's panel architecture, there are lots of other options, too:

I'd think you'd find this appealing, since you never have to leave your creative application.

[Bill Davis] "Also do I recall reading that considering the Photographer does all the work to create the Intellectual Property in the form of a great image, and uploads it to Adobe Stock, Adobe keeps significantly more than 50% of the license fee? "

A quick check on the contributor FAQs shows Adobe paying 33% on photography - more than twice as much as the base 15% from one of your other suggestions, iStock. I agree both numbers seem pretty grim, but maybe the volume they provide makes that worthwhile?

Either way, the metadata-based workflow you describe is also possible in Premiere, which actually has extensive metadata capabilities, especially at the asset level like this. I think Avid could easily do this, too, but it has been quite a while now since I've been on an Avid.

I don't mean to give you a hard time on this; it's probably just not the best example for FCPX. This is a real world problem that Adobe has a great handle on. Asset-based workflows are the new file-based workflow.

Walter Soyka
Designer & Mad Scientist at Keen Live [link]
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
@keenlive [twitter]   |   RenderBreak [blog]   |   Profile [LinkedIn]

Posts IndexRead Thread 

Current Message Thread:

© 2019 All Rights Reserved