APPLE FINAL CUT PRO: Apple Final Cut Pro X FCPX Debates FCP Legacy FCP Tutorials

Re: FCP X features or lack thereof. Your opinion on the rationale.

COW Forums : Apple Final Cut Pro X Debates

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Robin S. Kurz
Re: FCP X features or lack thereof. Your opinion on the rationale.
on Nov 30, 2016 at 9:06:52 am

[Jeremy Garchow] "And why doesn't every DAW support the open and free to use fcpmxl, or provide a free translation tool?"

Exactly. As far as I can see, Apple has in fact done their homework and even continue to do so. So how is it asking too much to now have others do their's (many of which are and don't seem to have a problem with it)?? That's the "standard" logic I'm having a really hard time following. But then I guess some people would have thought it a much better idea to "standardize" FCPXML 1.0 and leave it at that?

Especially since it's funny how e.g. Adobe has found time to fiddle with (as in change) the XMEML they export several times, but never found any time to simply support FCPXML. Even AFTER they bought Automatic Duck who were already doing it! Meanwhile FREE software such as Resolve support the new FCPXML the day after it is released.

It's a mysterious world, no?

- RK

____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!


Posts IndexRead Thread 


Current Message Thread:





© 2019 CreativeCOW.net All Rights Reserved
[TOP]