SUBSCRIBE
|
LOGIN
forums
tutorials & features
news
blogs
jobs
services
newsletter
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Apple Final Cut Pro X
FCPX Debates
FCP Legacy
FCP Tutorials
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
COW Forums
:
Apple Final Cut Pro X Debates
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by
Oliver Peters
on Jul 17, 2013 at 12:00:25 pm
I really like tracks, as well. I wish Apple had come up with a design that's somewhere in-between. Maybe tracks with the ability to collapse then into clip-containers. In any case, there is often a need to place a clip in an absolute relationship against time and in a locked vertical hierarchy. That is very difficult to do in X. That's without any connection or dependency to the clips around it. And no, the "position" mode and slugged secondary storylines is not adequate, IMHO.
Oliver
Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com
Posts Index
Read Thread
Report Post
Current Message Thread:
OT Logic gets its "X"
by Steve Connor on Jul 16, 2013 at 1:16:47 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Matt Trubac on Jul 16, 2013 at 1:37:13 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Craig Seeman on Jul 16, 2013 at 1:40:47 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Andy Field on Jul 16, 2013 at 2:06:00 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Craig Seeman on Jul 16, 2013 at 2:16:03 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Mark Dobson on Jul 16, 2013 at 2:28:04 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Mark Dobson on Jul 16, 2013 at 2:44:12 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Steve Connor on Jul 16, 2013 at 2:49:52 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Mark Dobson on Jul 16, 2013 at 2:55:29 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Marcus Moore on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:02:50 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Mark Dobson on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:07:07 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Ronny Courtens on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:18:12 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Neil Goodman on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:19:30 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Mark Dobson on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:45:44 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Oliver Peters on Jul 16, 2013 at 5:46:13 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by David Cherniack on Jul 16, 2013 at 7:34:44 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Neil Goodman on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:34:35 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by David Cherniack on Jul 16, 2013 at 11:47:38 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Oliver Peters on Jul 17, 2013 at 1:50:54 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Oliver Peters on Jul 17, 2013 at 1:51:58 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 18, 2013 at 9:20:15 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Charlie Austin on Jul 16, 2013 at 10:43:50 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 16, 2013 at 11:49:48 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Craig Shields on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:30:27 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by george manzanilla on Jul 16, 2013 at 10:27:01 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Richard Jacana on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:45:10 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Lance Bachelder on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:53:36 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Marcus Moore on Jul 16, 2013 at 4:10:27 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 16, 2013 at 5:00:07 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Craig Seeman on Jul 16, 2013 at 5:08:01 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Simon Ubsdell on Jul 16, 2013 at 5:21:45 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 16, 2013 at 5:22:34 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Charlie Austin on Jul 16, 2013 at 5:12:25 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Lance Bachelder on Jul 16, 2013 at 10:32:54 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 16, 2013 at 10:42:05 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Lance Bachelder on Jul 17, 2013 at 1:13:47 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Charlie Austin on Jul 17, 2013 at 1:15:41 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 17, 2013 at 1:29:51 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Oliver Peters on Jul 17, 2013 at 2:21:08 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Marcus Moore on Jul 17, 2013 at 2:45:02 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Bill Davis on Jul 17, 2013 at 3:24:00 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Marcus Moore on Jul 17, 2013 at 3:37:49 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Charlie Austin on Jul 17, 2013 at 4:35:03 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Lance Bachelder on Jul 17, 2013 at 11:12:49 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Oliver Peters on Jul 17, 2013 at 12:00:25 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Marcus Moore on Jul 17, 2013 at 2:47:45 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Charlie Austin on Jul 17, 2013 at 3:18:55 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 17, 2013 at 4:50:15 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Mathieu Ghekiere on Jul 16, 2013 at 6:23:38 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Helge Tjelta on Jul 16, 2013 at 7:54:01 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Oliver Peters on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:03:31 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Simon Ubsdell on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:14:56 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Ronny Courtens on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:42:27 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Neil Goodman on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:37:44 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Steve Connor on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:41:13 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Neil Goodman on Jul 16, 2013 at 10:53:17 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 16, 2013 at 11:54:31 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Chris Harlan on Jul 17, 2013 at 3:31:03 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Ronny Courtens on Jul 16, 2013 at 9:21:26 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Oliver Peters on Jul 16, 2013 at 9:37:03 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Charlie Austin on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:11:51 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Mathieu Ghekiere on Jul 17, 2013 at 8:14:15 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Ronny Courtens on Jul 17, 2013 at 10:32:59 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 17, 2013 at 4:52:39 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by John Davidson on Jul 17, 2013 at 10:45:13 pm
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Ian Bailey on Jul 17, 2013 at 11:17:51 am
Re: OT Logic gets its "X"
by Ronny Courtens on Jul 17, 2013 at 12:38:22 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
© 2019
CreativeCOW.net
All Rights Reserved
[
TOP
]