Re: OT Logic gets its "X"

COW Forums : Apple Final Cut Pro X Debates

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: OT Logic gets its "X"

by David Cherniack

on Jul 16, 2013 at 7:34:44 pm

[Oliver Peters] "Isn't this true of the new Pro Tools and Audition, as well?"

Not true of Audition which can bridge 32 bit plugins for use in its 64 bit architecture. I'd be surprised it Pro Tools can't do same and I don't think it's that difficult for Apple to do it with Logic...Maybe in the next update.

David
http://AllinOneFilms.com

Posts Index

Read Thread

Report Post

Current Message Thread:

OT Logic gets its "X" by Steve Connor on Jul 16, 2013 at 1:16:47 pm
- Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Matt Trubac on Jul 16, 2013 at 1:37:13 pm
- Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Craig Seeman on Jul 16, 2013 at 1:40:47 pm
  - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Andy Field on Jul 16, 2013 at 2:06:00 pm
    - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Craig Seeman on Jul 16, 2013 at 2:16:03 pm
      - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Mark Dobson on Jul 16, 2013 at 2:28:04 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Mark Dobson on Jul 16, 2013 at 2:44:12 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Steve Connor on Jul 16, 2013 at 2:49:52 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Mark Dobson on Jul 16, 2013 at 2:55:29 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Marcus Moore on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:02:50 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Mark Dobson on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:07:07 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Ronny Courtens on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:18:12 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Neil Goodman on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:19:30 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Mark Dobson on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:45:44 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Oliver Peters on Jul 16, 2013 at 5:46:13 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by David Cherniack on Jul 16, 2013 at 7:34:44 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Neil Goodman on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:34:35 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by David Cherniack on Jul 16, 2013 at 11:47:38 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Oliver Peters on Jul 17, 2013 at 1:50:54 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Oliver Peters on Jul 17, 2013 at 1:51:58 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 18, 2013 at 9:20:15 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Charlie Austin on Jul 16, 2013 at 10:43:50 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 16, 2013 at 11:49:48 pm
- Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Craig Shields on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:30:27 pm
  - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by george manzanilla on Jul 16, 2013 at 10:27:01 pm
- Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Richard Jacana on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:45:10 pm
- Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Lance Bachelder on Jul 16, 2013 at 3:53:36 pm
  - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Marcus Moore on Jul 16, 2013 at 4:10:27 pm
    - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 16, 2013 at 5:00:07 pm
      - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Craig Seeman on Jul 16, 2013 at 5:08:01 pm
      - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Simon Ubsdell on Jul 16, 2013 at 5:21:45 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 16, 2013 at 5:22:34 pm
    - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Charlie Austin on Jul 16, 2013 at 5:12:25 pm
      - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Lance Bachelder on Jul 16, 2013 at 10:32:54 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 16, 2013 at 10:42:05 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Lance Bachelder on Jul 17, 2013 at 1:13:47 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Charlie Austin on Jul 17, 2013 at 1:15:41 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 17, 2013 at 1:29:51 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Oliver Peters on Jul 17, 2013 at 2:21:08 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Marcus Moore on Jul 17, 2013 at 2:45:02 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Bill Davis on Jul 17, 2013 at 3:24:00 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Marcus Moore on Jul 17, 2013 at 3:37:49 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Charlie Austin on Jul 17, 2013 at 4:35:03 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Lance Bachelder on Jul 17, 2013 at 11:12:49 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Oliver Peters on Jul 17, 2013 at 12:00:25 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Marcus Moore on Jul 17, 2013 at 2:47:45 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Charlie Austin on Jul 17, 2013 at 3:18:55 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 17, 2013 at 4:50:15 pm
- Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Mathieu Ghekiere on Jul 16, 2013 at 6:23:38 pm
  - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Helge Tjelta on Jul 16, 2013 at 7:54:01 pm
    - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Oliver Peters on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:03:31 pm
      - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Simon Ubsdell on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:14:56 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Ronny Courtens on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:42:27 pm
      - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Neil Goodman on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:37:44 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Steve Connor on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:41:13 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Neil Goodman on Jul 16, 2013 at 10:53:17 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 16, 2013 at 11:54:31 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Chris Harlan on Jul 17, 2013 at 3:31:03 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Ronny Courtens on Jul 16, 2013 at 9:21:26 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Oliver Peters on Jul 16, 2013 at 9:37:03 pm
    - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Charlie Austin on Jul 16, 2013 at 8:11:51 pm
      - Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Mathieu Ghekiere on Jul 17, 2013 at 8:14:15 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Ronny Courtens on Jul 17, 2013 at 10:32:59 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Jeremy Garchow on Jul 17, 2013 at 4:52:39 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by John Davidson on Jul 17, 2013 at 10:45:13 pm
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Ian Bailey on Jul 17, 2013 at 11:17:51 am
        Re: OT Logic gets its "X" by Ronny Courtens on Jul 17, 2013 at 12:38:22 pm