SUBSCRIBE
|
LOGIN
forums
tutorials & features
news
blogs
jobs
services
newsletter
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Apple Final Cut Pro X
FCPX Debates
FCP Legacy
FCP Tutorials
Re: Editing scenario
COW Forums
:
Apple Final Cut Pro X Debates
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Editing scenario
by
Jeremy Garchow
on May 14, 2012 at 3:59:16 pm
[David Lawrence]
"For me, all the roadblocks I hit in FCPX feel like places where the designers weren't paying attention. Either thru over-simplification, or by making narrow assumptions. Jim's tracked timeline workaround is a wonderfully creative solution to a problem that a good design wouldn't have created in the first place."
lolcats
People seem to think fcpx is complete. It's not.
I have said from the beginning, that the timeline is what is going to change about fcpx. But let's look at what it does do well, professionally.
First, is media management. Once learned, fcpx has some very useful ways of keeping your media tidy, transcoding in the background while allowing you to work on the material as its transcoding, and the software switches to the optimized media when it's complete. It allows you to move media around, fairly easily, and mount projects/events on other machines super easily. I allows the sharing of big swaths of media, but not duplicating that media into the event.
It has SAN Locations which allow a manual check in/out process that is, in my opinion, better than most NLEs in terms of a built in workflow. It's right there in the file menu. What iMovie user gives a hoot about a SAN? How many fcp legacy users do?
Fcpxml, while still needing functionality, is already pretty decent. You can get to resolve, RCX, smoke 2013, and via through a bit of jockeying/paid apps, you can get OMF/fcp7 XMLs/EDL. Is that professional, or no? Bad design?
If you like it, then Event structure is very well thought out. It is useful, very powerful, and keeps thngs as messy or as organized as you want. It is dynamic and allows multiple descriptors per clip, and by its very design allows multiple "locations" of clips without actual duplication. This is very useful to me.
So, you can tell where the development time has gone. It has gone in to very professional features that iMovie converts will never use.
The timeline, needs more development, and in my opinion, it will probably get there. Apple even said they are working on it.
I mean this with all due respect, and I know adobe can take it, but have you media managed anything, or used any sort of interchange out with Pr yet? How about relink of avchd media, or any media for that matter?
These things matter to us in a "multiuser" environment, we switch users/projects and have offsite and onsite edits happening. Fcpx makes these types of processes extremely easy to share.
When we were talking the other day about the timeline being "just the surface" of an NLE, I wasn't kidding. I spend most of my time editing in a timeline, but these back end features, the ones that will stop you in your tracks if everything isn't lining up, are important to me and our business. While it takes a bit of getting used to, this part of fcpx works very very well and it is things that iMovie heros have zero use for. While I agree that the timeline needs some beefier controls, the backed of fcpx is looking to be rather robust. That's important to someone like me.
[David Lawrence]
"This disconnect between functionality and intentionality is why so many people are clamoring for persistent in/out marks. It's not that you can't achieve the same functionality, you certainly can. What people are asking for are tools that match their more specific intentionality. And it just so happens that this intentionality is one of the core actions in the editing process itself."
I'm sorry man, but Fcp7 in and out marks aren't even persistent. Fcpx's are if you just hit f. I will argue this in to the ground.
Ins/outs don't work like fcp7, it doesn't look like fcp7, it actually works a bit better than fcp7, unless you use extended markers (which I do in 7 a lot). X allows actual persistent in/out, when 7s last until you hit another in, or clear in/out in the browser. So, really, what is your intention? Persistent, or sort of persistent sometimes? If hitting 'f' is too much task, than yeah, fcpx will never fit.
Jeremy
Posts Index
Read Thread
Report Post
Current Message Thread:
Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 13, 2012 at 2:01:41 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 13, 2012 at 3:19:16 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 13, 2012 at 3:57:25 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 13, 2012 at 4:33:07 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Greg Andonian on May 13, 2012 at 4:20:17 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Andy Neil on May 13, 2012 at 4:26:41 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 13, 2012 at 4:34:29 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Bret Williams on May 13, 2012 at 7:00:11 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 13, 2012 at 7:29:35 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Franz Bieberkopf on May 13, 2012 at 4:47:10 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Lance Bachelder on May 13, 2012 at 5:13:29 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 13, 2012 at 7:02:52 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 13, 2012 at 7:32:50 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 13, 2012 at 7:45:42 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 13, 2012 at 8:08:19 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Lance Bachelder on May 13, 2012 at 7:56:17 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 13, 2012 at 8:14:44 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 13, 2012 at 8:48:15 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by TImothy Auld on May 18, 2012 at 4:52:01 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 18, 2012 at 5:02:03 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 18, 2012 at 5:52:05 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 18, 2012 at 6:12:54 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 18, 2012 at 8:45:35 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Lance Bachelder on May 13, 2012 at 9:33:13 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by stevez on May 13, 2012 at 7:50:52 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 13, 2012 at 9:59:50 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 13, 2012 at 6:42:26 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jules bowman on May 13, 2012 at 7:29:59 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 13, 2012 at 7:42:31 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jules bowman on May 13, 2012 at 8:08:33 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 13, 2012 at 8:39:37 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jules bowman on May 13, 2012 at 8:49:08 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 13, 2012 at 8:50:11 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on May 13, 2012 at 8:55:00 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 8:00:35 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 2:39:56 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 3:30:08 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 4:44:08 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 6:49:44 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 7:09:02 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 7:23:44 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 8:06:04 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jules bowman on May 14, 2012 at 10:12:49 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 10:46:33 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jules bowman on May 14, 2012 at 10:58:23 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 3:40:59 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 14, 2012 at 5:30:52 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 5:38:58 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 14, 2012 at 6:01:41 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 5:50:42 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Herb Sevush on May 15, 2012 at 12:21:29 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 12:22:59 am
Re: Editing scenario
by alban egger on Jul 22, 2012 at 8:16:43 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 22, 2012 at 9:37:09 am
Re: Editing scenario
by alban egger on Jul 22, 2012 at 4:48:55 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Michael Garber on May 13, 2012 at 9:47:04 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Greg Andonian on May 14, 2012 at 7:15:05 am
Re: Editing scenario
by John Godwin on May 13, 2012 at 9:50:12 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 13, 2012 at 7:58:19 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Michael Sanders on May 13, 2012 at 7:34:06 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Andy Field on May 13, 2012 at 8:49:24 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 13, 2012 at 8:51:20 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 13, 2012 at 9:21:38 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 13, 2012 at 9:49:25 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 13, 2012 at 10:01:18 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 13, 2012 at 10:06:10 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 13, 2012 at 10:09:58 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 9:11:26 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Andy Neil on May 14, 2012 at 7:29:21 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jules bowman on May 13, 2012 at 11:42:21 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by John Godwin on May 13, 2012 at 11:46:33 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 13, 2012 at 11:22:47 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 1:02:06 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 2:52:04 am
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 3:33:24 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 4:04:14 am
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 8:02:28 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 3:59:16 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 4:18:13 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 4:31:28 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 4:33:54 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 4:36:22 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 4:41:13 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 4:26:04 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 4:49:42 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 5:15:44 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 5:44:56 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 10:17:36 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 10:37:34 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 5:37:43 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 6:08:02 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 6:34:18 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 6:57:40 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 7:21:56 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 7:51:48 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 9:15:00 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 14, 2012 at 9:30:52 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 9:52:11 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 14, 2012 at 10:00:26 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 11:07:53 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 11:11:07 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Tony Sarafoski on May 15, 2012 at 8:23:13 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 12:29:08 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Michael Garber on May 15, 2012 at 4:37:16 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 12:38:31 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 12:59:51 am
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 1:07:38 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 3:07:58 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 11:42:06 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 1:10:39 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Richard Herd on May 15, 2012 at 5:35:17 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 6:19:11 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Richard Herd on May 15, 2012 at 9:10:27 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 14, 2012 at 7:26:00 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 7:39:52 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 8:26:20 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 14, 2012 at 9:45:12 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 10:46:48 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 14, 2012 at 11:05:41 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 12:12:11 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 12:42:45 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 7:08:52 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 7:31:26 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 7:35:34 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 7:37:48 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 8:13:04 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 8:35:36 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 8:46:42 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 11:16:33 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Andrew Kimery on May 14, 2012 at 10:33:26 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 10:43:22 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 11:08:15 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 11:23:24 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 11:31:05 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 11:36:03 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 14, 2012 at 11:52:10 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 3:14:15 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 5:09:28 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 5:25:44 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 5:36:00 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 5:43:22 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 5:44:48 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 6:02:32 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 6:26:46 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 6:42:32 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 6:55:57 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 6:56:38 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 7:03:24 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 7:42:21 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 5:55:54 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 6:04:16 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 6:51:20 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 6:56:11 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 7:25:53 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 6:59:00 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 6:09:21 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 6:14:04 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 6:26:13 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 5:31:39 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 6:50:43 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 7:32:50 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 7:46:05 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 7:51:01 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 7:59:09 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 8:09:08 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 8:13:00 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 8:33:30 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 8:47:39 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 8:59:10 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 15, 2012 at 9:08:52 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 16, 2012 at 7:30:40 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 16, 2012 at 8:42:55 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 16, 2012 at 8:46:04 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 16, 2012 at 8:46:23 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 16, 2012 at 8:46:44 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 17, 2012 at 1:14:57 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 17, 2012 at 2:11:34 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 17, 2012 at 3:35:09 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 8:48:18 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 7:24:01 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 7:47:21 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 15, 2012 at 8:36:14 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 9:17:01 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 10:16:18 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 16, 2012 at 8:04:07 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 16, 2012 at 6:53:01 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 17, 2012 at 5:00:55 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 17, 2012 at 5:31:18 am
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 17, 2012 at 5:41:26 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 17, 2012 at 5:52:57 am
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 17, 2012 at 6:28:40 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 17, 2012 at 3:38:01 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by Jeremy Garchow on May 18, 2012 at 3:28:28 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by Walter Soyka on May 18, 2012 at 3:54:25 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by Jeremy Garchow on May 18, 2012 at 4:59:25 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by Walter Soyka on May 18, 2012 at 5:03:49 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by David Lawrence on May 19, 2012 at 2:33:38 am
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by Steve Connor on May 19, 2012 at 9:05:54 am
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by Herb Sevush on May 19, 2012 at 2:45:30 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by Oliver Peters on May 19, 2012 at 2:56:46 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by Herb Sevush on May 19, 2012 at 3:05:30 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by Steve Connor on May 19, 2012 at 3:28:56 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by Jeremy Garchow on May 21, 2012 at 4:42:03 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by Herb Sevush on May 19, 2012 at 2:43:12 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Building applications at this level is not easy
by Jeremy Garchow on May 21, 2012 at 4:43:10 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 19, 2012 at 2:19:04 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 21, 2012 at 4:40:44 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Jeremy Garchow on May 21, 2012 at 8:58:21 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by David Lawrence on May 21, 2012 at 9:12:43 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 1:31:08 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Jeremy Garchow on May 22, 2012 at 3:59:32 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 5:55:33 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Jeremy Garchow on May 22, 2012 at 6:21:34 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 6:30:26 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Jeremy Garchow on May 22, 2012 at 6:49:42 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 7:11:25 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Jeremy Garchow on May 22, 2012 at 7:47:13 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 8:14:49 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Jeremy Garchow on May 22, 2012 at 9:28:01 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 10:10:43 pm
Re: Editing scenario - Why PIOPs might not be easy
by Walter Soyka on May 22, 2012 at 8:22:03 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 21, 2012 at 9:07:02 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 11:51:48 pm
Re: Editing scenarios
by David Lawrence on Jun 6, 2012 at 7:21:03 am
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 11:56:04 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 11:40:18 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 12:02:49 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on May 15, 2012 at 12:04:50 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 12:04:35 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on May 15, 2012 at 12:09:23 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 14, 2012 at 7:38:44 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 8:17:39 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 8:59:57 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Andy Neil on May 14, 2012 at 9:16:42 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 9:35:18 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 14, 2012 at 10:13:06 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jules bowman on May 15, 2012 at 7:53:36 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 12:27:50 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jules bowman on May 15, 2012 at 12:36:47 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 12:40:06 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jules bowman on May 15, 2012 at 12:41:53 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 1:10:41 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 12:48:48 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 1:13:20 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 15, 2012 at 1:51:30 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 2:27:27 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 4:33:16 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 4:36:50 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 9:21:44 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Aindreas Gallagher on May 14, 2012 at 7:10:59 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Alex Hawkins on May 14, 2012 at 11:45:58 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 1:52:44 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Michael Hancock on May 15, 2012 at 1:58:41 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 2:23:34 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Alex Hawkins on May 16, 2012 at 12:44:04 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 16, 2012 at 6:55:30 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Alex Hawkins on May 14, 2012 at 5:08:22 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 14, 2012 at 6:29:35 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Alex Hawkins on May 14, 2012 at 6:58:56 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Chris Harlan on May 14, 2012 at 7:21:42 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 12:11:15 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 4:31:39 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 5:15:36 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Steve Connor on May 14, 2012 at 5:44:09 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 9:56:03 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 14, 2012 at 10:04:35 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 14, 2012 at 10:28:09 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 12:10:04 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 12:46:46 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 1:17:15 am
Re: Editing scenario
by David Lawrence on May 15, 2012 at 1:19:45 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jules bowman on May 15, 2012 at 8:02:40 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 15, 2012 at 4:15:12 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 1:21:08 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 3:06:44 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Walter Soyka on May 15, 2012 at 5:14:21 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jeremy Garchow on May 15, 2012 at 5:33:28 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 13, 2012 at 11:02:36 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Jim Giberti on May 13, 2012 at 11:25:18 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 1:04:25 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Alex Hawkins on May 14, 2012 at 2:34:35 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 12:04:20 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Alex Hawkins on May 14, 2012 at 11:08:52 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 15, 2012 at 12:13:34 am
Re: Editing scenario
by tony west on May 14, 2012 at 11:48:17 am
Re: Editing scenario
by Michael Sanders on May 14, 2012 at 11:51:37 am
Re: Editing scenario
by tony west on May 14, 2012 at 1:08:54 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Simon Ubsdell on May 14, 2012 at 1:19:15 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by tony west on May 14, 2012 at 3:15:50 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Carsten Orlt on May 14, 2012 at 1:41:52 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 4:08:11 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Oliver Peters on May 14, 2012 at 10:04:42 pm
Re: Editing scenario
by Richard Herd on May 14, 2012 at 4:08:44 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
© 2018
CreativeCOW.net
All Rights Reserved
[
TOP
]