SUBSCRIBE
|
LOGIN
forums
tutorials & features
news
blogs
jobs
services
newsletter
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Apple Final Cut Pro X
FCPX Debates
FCP Legacy
FCP Tutorials
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
COW Forums
:
Apple Final Cut Pro X Debates
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by
tony west
on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:16:05 pm
[Daniel Frome]
"Avid's easiest comparison would simply be making subclips. You can rename the subclips and they will always remember their link back to the master clip, so it serves the same purpose.
"
Making subclips makes more media to take up space though right?
Posts Index
Read Thread
Report Post
Current Message Thread:
Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Alan Okey on Apr 2, 2012 at 5:32:17 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 2, 2012 at 5:56:26 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Simon Ubsdell on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:35:14 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 2, 2012 at 5:59:29 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:06:47 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by tony west on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:16:05 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:18:04 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by tony west on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:31:25 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:38:01 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by tony west on Apr 2, 2012 at 11:46:47 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Keith Carunida on Apr 2, 2012 at 7:18:32 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 7:24:14 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Keith Carunida on Apr 2, 2012 at 7:40:23 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 7:51:40 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Michael Phillips on Apr 2, 2012 at 8:01:46 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 8:04:13 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Keith Carunida on Apr 2, 2012 at 8:19:20 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Bill Davis on Apr 2, 2012 at 8:55:57 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 9:06:14 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Bill Davis on Apr 3, 2012 at 2:18:53 am
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 3:19:01 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 3, 2012 at 3:29:45 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 3:42:07 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 5:08:18 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 5:39:11 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Bill Davis on Apr 3, 2012 at 7:12:39 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Michael Hancock on Apr 3, 2012 at 7:32:11 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 7:35:13 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 8:44:10 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Michael Hancock on Apr 3, 2012 at 8:52:43 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 8:57:24 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Bill Davis on Apr 3, 2012 at 9:43:14 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 7:35:06 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 7:35:59 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 8:57:02 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 9:29:40 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 9:41:37 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 3, 2012 at 7:49:21 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 8:07:10 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 9:11:37 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 9:20:44 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:06:31 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Bill Davis on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:28:10 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Herb Sevush on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:06:12 am
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:12:25 am
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Herb Sevush on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:46:10 am
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:50:44 am
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Franz Bieberkopf on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:17:06 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:49:38 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:55:11 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 11:07:12 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 3, 2012 at 11:38:58 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 11:51:10 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 4, 2012 at 12:48:38 am
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 3:41:32 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Herb Sevush on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:02:11 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:09:40 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Herb Sevush on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:19:02 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:32:38 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Herb Sevush on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:52:00 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:58:46 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 6, 2012 at 2:59:01 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 6, 2012 at 3:44:38 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 6, 2012 at 3:47:47 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 6, 2012 at 4:04:13 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 6, 2012 at 4:11:48 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 6, 2012 at 4:25:08 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 7, 2012 at 1:42:57 am
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 7, 2012 at 2:05:11 am
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 7, 2012 at 2:11:12 am
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Bill Davis on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:15:39 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:39:08 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:46:29 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Bill Davis on Apr 4, 2012 at 12:07:27 am
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 12:22:44 am
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by moody glasgow on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:23:58 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:53:24 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Walter Soyka on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:57:47 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 1:49:35 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:05:28 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:29:18 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:43:42 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 3:58:57 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Richard Herd on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:09:26 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:44:11 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Richard Herd on Apr 4, 2012 at 5:39:00 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 5:55:07 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Daniel Frome on Apr 4, 2012 at 5:50:23 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Andrew Kimery on Apr 4, 2012 at 6:26:27 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 6:38:17 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:29:43 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:48:04 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:54:23 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Bill Davis on Apr 4, 2012 at 6:23:11 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jim Giberti on Apr 4, 2012 at 6:44:41 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Bill Davis on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:11:28 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Jim Giberti on Apr 4, 2012 at 8:24:27 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Bill Davis on Apr 4, 2012 at 11:31:36 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:40:34 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Bill Davis on Apr 5, 2012 at 6:29:33 am
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Oliver Peters on Apr 5, 2012 at 2:26:04 pm
Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?
by Chris Harlan on Apr 7, 2012 at 3:22:29 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
© 2019
CreativeCOW.net
All Rights Reserved
[
TOP
]