SUBSCRIBE | LOGIN

forums tutorials & features news blogs jobs services newsletter

APPLE FINAL CUT PRO: Apple Final Cut Pro X FCPX Debates FCP Legacy FCP Tutorials

Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?

COW Forums : Apple Final Cut Pro X Debates

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Daniel Frome

Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X?

by Daniel Frome

on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:06:47 pm

No, FCP7 has had 'range based markers' since 7.01 I think. FCPX's implementation is better, but same concept.

Avid's easiest comparison would simply be making subclips. You can rename the subclips and they will always remember their link back to the master clip, so it serves the same purpose.

Current Message Thread:

Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Alan Okey on Apr 2, 2012 at 5:32:17 pm
- Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 2, 2012 at 5:56:26 pm
  - Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Simon Ubsdell on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:35:14 pm
- Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 2, 2012 at 5:59:29 pm
- Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:06:47 pm
  - Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by tony west on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:16:05 pm
    - Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:18:04 pm
      - Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by tony west on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:31:25 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 6:38:01 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by tony west on Apr 2, 2012 at 11:46:47 pm
  - Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Keith Carunida on Apr 2, 2012 at 7:18:32 pm
    - Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 7:24:14 pm
      - Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Keith Carunida on Apr 2, 2012 at 7:40:23 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 7:51:40 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Michael Phillips on Apr 2, 2012 at 8:01:46 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 8:04:13 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Keith Carunida on Apr 2, 2012 at 8:19:20 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Bill Davis on Apr 2, 2012 at 8:55:57 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Daniel Frome on Apr 2, 2012 at 9:06:14 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Bill Davis on Apr 3, 2012 at 2:18:53 am
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 3:19:01 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Walter Soyka on Apr 3, 2012 at 3:29:45 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 3:42:07 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 5:08:18 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 5:39:11 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Bill Davis on Apr 3, 2012 at 7:12:39 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Michael Hancock on Apr 3, 2012 at 7:32:11 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 7:35:13 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 8:44:10 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Michael Hancock on Apr 3, 2012 at 8:52:43 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 8:57:24 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Bill Davis on Apr 3, 2012 at 9:43:14 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 7:35:06 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 7:35:59 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 8:57:02 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 9:29:40 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 9:41:37 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Walter Soyka on Apr 3, 2012 at 7:49:21 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 8:07:10 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Richard Herd on Apr 3, 2012 at 9:11:37 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 9:20:44 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Andrew Kimery on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:06:31 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Bill Davis on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:28:10 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Herb Sevush on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:06:12 am
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:12:25 am
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Herb Sevush on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:46:10 am
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:50:44 am
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Franz Bieberkopf on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:17:06 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:49:38 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:55:11 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 11:07:12 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 3, 2012 at 11:38:58 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 3, 2012 at 11:51:10 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 4, 2012 at 12:48:38 am
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 3:41:32 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Herb Sevush on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:02:11 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:09:40 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Herb Sevush on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:19:02 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:32:38 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Herb Sevush on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:52:00 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:58:46 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 6, 2012 at 2:59:01 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 6, 2012 at 3:44:38 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 6, 2012 at 3:47:47 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 6, 2012 at 4:04:13 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 6, 2012 at 4:11:48 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 6, 2012 at 4:25:08 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 7, 2012 at 1:42:57 am
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 7, 2012 at 2:05:11 am
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Walter Soyka on Apr 7, 2012 at 2:11:12 am
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Bill Davis on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:15:39 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Walter Soyka on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:39:08 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Andrew Kimery on Apr 3, 2012 at 10:46:29 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Bill Davis on Apr 4, 2012 at 12:07:27 am
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jeremy Garchow on Apr 4, 2012 at 12:22:44 am
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by moody glasgow on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:23:58 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Walter Soyka on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:53:24 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Walter Soyka on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:57:47 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 1:49:35 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:05:28 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:29:18 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 4, 2012 at 2:43:42 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 3:58:57 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Richard Herd on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:09:26 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 4:44:11 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Richard Herd on Apr 4, 2012 at 5:39:00 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 5:55:07 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Daniel Frome on Apr 4, 2012 at 5:50:23 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Andrew Kimery on Apr 4, 2012 at 6:26:27 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 6:38:17 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:29:43 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Andrew Richards on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:48:04 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:54:23 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Bill Davis on Apr 4, 2012 at 6:23:11 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jim Giberti on Apr 4, 2012 at 6:44:41 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Bill Davis on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:11:28 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Jim Giberti on Apr 4, 2012 at 8:24:27 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Bill Davis on Apr 4, 2012 at 11:31:36 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:40:34 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Bill Davis on Apr 5, 2012 at 6:29:33 am
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Oliver Peters on Apr 5, 2012 at 2:26:04 pm
        Re: Range-based keywording: unique to FCP X? by Chris Harlan on Apr 7, 2012 at 3:22:29 am

© 2019 CreativeCOW.net All Rights Reserved