Re: FCPX or Not...

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: FCPX or Not...
by Jim Giberti on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:10:31 pm

[Walter Soyka] "Why not compare FCPX to mature apps? The market must. FCPX is not competing against FCP1. It's competing against PrP CS5.5, MC6, and FCP7.
"

This is the only valid comparison Walter.

We're talking professional use, the community that's been based largely around FCP and whether they'll stay with Apple or move to another program.

That's the debate.

Not to beat a dead horse, but if they allowed for demagnetization, a simple track grid and mixer (you know that old fashioned proven stuff) FCPX could be a great program.

Right now it's half a great program and half a not great program.

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 19, 2012 at 2:43:33 am
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Daniel Frome on Mar 19, 2012 at 11:58:18 am
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Steve Connor on Mar 19, 2012 at 12:08:10 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not... by Shane Ross on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:11:32 pm
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Mitch Ives on Mar 19, 2012 at 3:34:08 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:11:36 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 4:10:14 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:05:15 pm
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:09:22 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 5:58:33 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:08:17 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:38:58 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:44:35 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:47:24 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:52:06 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:57:20 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:03:29 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:08:58 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 7:53:35 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:05:36 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:39:15 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:04:56 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:24:15 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Cherniack on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:04 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:10:29 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 6:37:41 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:26:42 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Daniel Frome on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:22:44 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:25:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 8:48:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Aindreas Gallagher on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:08:51 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:28:54 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Chris Harlan on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:16:18 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:36:10 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Rick Fromet on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:35:18 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by tony west on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:37:06 pm
        Re: (OT) FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 8:57:53 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 12:47:43 am
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 8:47:43 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 19, 2012 at 9:50:34 pm
  - Re: FCPX or Not... by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 1:15:44 pm
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:49:12 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Walter Soyka on Mar 20, 2012 at 2:55:09 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:52:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:10:31 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:52:08 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:48 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:44:37 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 3:22:05 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:16:24 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:36:49 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:28:05 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 8:35:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 22, 2012 at 9:27:22 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 22, 2012 at 7:37:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:34:18 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:38:29 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:41:28 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Chris Harlan on Mar 23, 2012 at 12:51:57 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 1:14:07 am
    - Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26:16 pm
      - Re: FCPX or Not... by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 4:40:12 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:03:37 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Andy Field on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:25:06 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:12:31 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 5:30:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Steve Connor on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:09:52 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 6:32:19 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:06:40 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:01:27 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 20, 2012 at 7:19:56 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:20 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 3:52:26 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Shawn Miller on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:33:41 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Bill Davis on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:15:53 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:02:39 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by sandy shapiro on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:36:04 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 1:38:28 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Steve Connor on Mar 21, 2012 at 2:43:05 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:06:21 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:09:58 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:57:57 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Michael Hancock on Mar 21, 2012 at 5:14:07 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 7:53:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jeremy Garchow on Mar 21, 2012 at 9:34:47 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 21, 2012 at 4:03:45 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gothmann on Mar 21, 2012 at 10:28:18 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 22, 2012 at 12:15:11 am
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Andy Field on Mar 22, 2012 at 1:33:52 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Christian Schumacher on Mar 23, 2012 at 3:08:40 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Richard Herd on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:43:34 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by David Lawrence on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56:54 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:58:14 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 23, 2012 at 5:57:42 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 5:57:58 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:05:15 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:22:03 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:30:36 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:40:19 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Jim Giberti on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:08:28 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 8:22:52 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:30 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Craig Seeman on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:37:53 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Simon Ubsdell on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:42:08 pm
        Re: FCPX or Not... by Frank Gonzales on Mar 28, 2012 at 6:53:44 pm
- Re: FCPX or Not... by Thomas Frank on Mar 24, 2012 at 4:29:32 am


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • FEATURES • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • JOBS • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS