FORUMS: list search recent posts

Re: Keeping track of the creative proccess

COW Forums : Art of the Edit

Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread

Re: Keeping track of the creative proccess
on Nov 12, 2005 at 5:59:20 am

Two features at one time...that might be half of the problem! Keeping a mental picture/roadmap gets easier over time as you get used to the volume of material and the form of a feature as opposed to shorter stuff.

One thing you might want to do is keep an editor's logbook. You could have a couple of sections in it, one that deals with the broader elements in the film: story elements, character arcs, themes, objectives for specific scenes etc..., then another that you'd update daily with what you did that day and why. That way, you can always come back to see how you got to where you are.

[Rick Sebeck] "Sometimes you make a small change in version 7A, and it doesn't end up in the 6 other versions because you don't copy and paste!"

Decide on what kind of version control to have and stay consistent. Everyone works differently and has different organizational structures. In the above example, if 7A is the most recent, why make any changes to 1-6? If 7A doesn't work out, go back to the previous one that did, maybe version 5, name that one version 8 (or whatever) and keep moving forward. If weeks or months down the line you come back and say "didn't we do something that was interesting back weeks or months ago?" you can check your logbook.

[Rick Sebeck] "He mentioned something about having a different FCP project for ever 3 minutes of screen time. Anyone know why you would need to do that?"

It could be a couple of different reasons. From a workflow perspective, the smaller projects are easier to work on and share among the different areas of production (from the director reviewing a cut, to the sound department). They probably keep one scene to one project file. It would also be easier when sharing files and to know what the status of each project file/scene was. Imagine having a whole series of scenes on different sequences in one project file - which one needed foley work, etc? Though I think they just shared QT movies between departments. Also, by keeping discreet project files of 2-3 mintues segments, you keep the actual file sizes down. I've heard FCP project files growing over 10-15MB can cause problems (not an expert here!). And if one project file gets corrupted or lost or whatever, it's not as critical. It'd be interesting to chat with Sean about it.

[Rick Sebeck] "On the same note. Walter Murch and Sean both mentioned that FCP was too slow when opening new projects. I have to say that both projects I am working on (one 35mm telecined to miniDV and the other on HDcam 720p) open in about 2-3 minutes. "

Probably when you have 40, 50, 60+ project files, and you are moving back and forth between them, constantly waiting a couple of minutes or even a minute can be irritating. Yes it's blazing fast compared to the old days, but when you get into a rhythm and then in specific areas hit a traffic jam, well you complain about that traffic jam. And if they are opening a project file to just check something in another scene that will take all of 2-3 seconds, but they need to wait 1 minute or 2 minutes each time, that is an area for improvement :-)

[Rick Sebeck] "Also, just a little note on our workflow - the director, myself, and my AE all have FW drives with all of the media on them. We then pass FCP projects around and re-link the media (which takes about 5 minutes). Its a pretty cool workflow, thought I would share."

It is. Thanks for sharing. What's cool is you can all be in different locations and just email files to each other. (This is one area where version control is absolutely critical!)

Good luck on your films.

"Go slow to go fast"

Posts IndexRead Thread 

Current Message Thread:

© 2019 All Rights Reserved