FORUMS: list search recent posts

Rode NTG-2 v. RTG-3

COW Forums : Audio Professionals

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
Tony Connoly
Rode NTG-2 v. RTG-3
on Nov 10, 2010 at 3:20:02 am

I was looking at frequency response charts of these two mics. They seem markedly different. I was wondering what subjective impressions you might have about these two.


Return to posts index

Eric Toline
Re: Rode NTG-2 v. RTG-3
on Nov 11, 2010 at 2:44:49 am

Don't you mean NTG-3?

Eric


Return to posts index

Tony Connoly
Re: Rode NTG-2 v. NTG-3
on Nov 11, 2010 at 2:49:36 am

Yes, I meant NTG-3. Thanks.


Return to posts index


Bob Kessler
Re: Rode NTG-2 v. NTG-3
on Nov 11, 2010 at 4:36:11 pm

Well, you may have noticed that the NTG-3 is $400 more than the NTG-2, that means they took more care in the manufacture and quality of the components. So yes, it will have better specs. The NTG-3 has been called the poor mans MKH-416; only time will tell if that reputation holds up in the long run.


Return to posts index

Tony Connoly
Re: Rode NTG-2 v. NTG-3
on Nov 17, 2010 at 12:15:36 pm

Thanks for pointing that out. I was wondering if anyone had a subjective view of the matter.


Return to posts index

Noam Osband
Re: Rode NTG-2 v. NTG-3
on Jul 21, 2011 at 9:44:26 pm

I'm about to make this same choice now. I guess I'm inclined to pay a bit more for the NTG-3 and consider it a long term investment but Id love to hear other opinions.


Return to posts index

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
© 2017 CreativeCOW.net All Rights Reserved
[TOP]