FORUMS: list search recent posts

FX 8320 or GTX 950 render?

COW Forums : VEGAS Pro

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
Just Hoza
FX 8320 or GTX 950 render?
on Jul 4, 2016 at 10:06:06 pm

Hi all,

i would like to ask you - what is better for rendering in Sony Vegas with 1080p and 60FPS settings. Rendering via CPU (AMD FX 8320, 4.5 Ghz) or CPU (Nvidia GTX 950) ?

Thanks for reply.


Return to posts index

John Rofrano
Re: FX 8320 or GTX 950 render?
on Jul 4, 2016 at 11:20:33 pm

Neither. The AMD is a horrible processor for video editing (it is weaker than an Intel Core i5) and Vegas Pro doesn't support the GTX 950 for rendering. So you are stuck with the AMD CPU for renders.

If you want great performance with Vegas Pro, try an Intel Core i7 CPU and AMD Radeon HD 69xx or 290x GPU.

~jr

http://www.johnrofrano.com
http://www.vasstsoftware.com



Return to posts index

Just Hoza
Re: FX 8320 or GTX 950 render?
on Jul 5, 2016 at 8:18:05 am

Are you sure? Because when i tried to render via GPU and test it - it shows "CUDA available". That looks like rendering via GPU should be ok.


Return to posts index


John Rofrano
Re: FX 8320 or GTX 950 render?
on Jul 5, 2016 at 12:16:38 pm

If it shows CUDA available then try a render with something like GPUZ running and see if if there is any GPU activity. My understanding is that you need to be using a GTX 5xx or lower for CUDA to work with renders.

~jr

http://www.johnrofrano.com
http://www.vasstsoftware.com



Return to posts index

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
© 2017 CreativeCOW.net All Rights Reserved
[TOP]