FORUMS: list search recent posts

AVC50 vs. AVC100

COW Forums : Panasonic Cameras

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
Jeff Cadge
AVC50 vs. AVC100
on Aug 1, 2009 at 8:37:39 pm


I’m shooting a run & gun type corporate project with a HPX300, mostly daylight exteriors and I’m looking at shooting AVC50 to get twice amount of record time since I won’t be in a clean area to download cards during the day.

I’m wondering if anyone has tested the differences between AVC100 & AVC 50, I did a few exteriors tests and the 50 looks pretty good.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Jeff Cadge



Return to posts index


Jeff Cadge
Re: AVC50 vs. AVC100
on Aug 2, 2009 at 12:31:28 pm

Hey Jeremy,

Thanks for the link, it presents a good case for AVC 50 over XDCAM.

I now feel comfortable shooting AVC50 for this project.

Best,

Jeff Cadge
Cadge Productions Inc.



Return to posts index


Jeremy Garchow
Re: AVC50 vs. AVC100
on Aug 2, 2009 at 5:18:05 pm

AVC-100 is 4:2:2 full raster.
AVC-50 is 4:2:0 thin raster.
Both are 10 bit.

Jeremy


Return to posts index

Jeff Cadge
Re: AVC50 vs. AVC100
on Aug 2, 2009 at 5:34:00 pm

Jeremy,

I'm not familiar with the term thin raster. Can you explain how it differs from full raster?

Thanks!

Jeff


Return to posts index

Jeremy Garchow
Re: AVC50 vs. AVC100
on Aug 2, 2009 at 5:39:09 pm

In ordet to get the file sizes smaller, a lot of techniques scale down the footage to less that full raster size (1920x1080). The thin raster size is 1440x1080. 960x720 for 720p.

Jeremy


Return to posts index

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
© 2019 CreativeCOW.net All Rights Reserved
[TOP]