FORUMS: list search recent posts

Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System

COW Forums : Blackmagic Design

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
Chuck Pullen
Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 8, 2012 at 3:01:49 pm

I am thinking of using the ATEM Camera Converter for one or two cameras in my live productions. The only hitch (Besides not having Genlock) that I am seeing, is using this with my existing RTS wired intercom system, any thoughts on what the interface would be, and if it would work? I have just read that it is possible to purchase tactical fiber bundled with copper audio, but that really defeats the purpose of going fiber.

Chuck


Return to posts index

Bob Zelin
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 9, 2012 at 12:07:09 am

RTS and ClearCom send power down the line. This won't work with a fibre link - you ain't gonna power an RTS beltpack with a fibre connection - converter or not.

Bob Zelin



Return to posts index

Richard Crowley
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 9, 2012 at 3:00:54 am

The ATEM Camera Converter has a built-in intercom system, so an RTS (or Clearcom, et.al.) are not needed at the camera end(s).

However, if you want to interconnect the ATEM system to the rest of the production team, you need the kind of interface Mr. Pullen is asking about.

The ATEM system appears to use a digital stream like AES3 (or SPDIF?) for each direction of the intercom system (judging by the recommended interconnection diagrams.) However, it doesn't seem terribly likely that it is a conventional/compatible AES or SPDIF data format since it is only one channel (and perhaps lower bit-rate as well since it is only intercom and not program audio).

It would appear that a digital-to-analog conversion for the outgoing audio and analog-to-digital conversion for incoming audio would be required. Unless somebody reverse-engineers the intercom digital data stream, it seems to me that it would be easiest to simply use an additional Camera Converter and interface the headset signals into a corresponding RTS (or Clearcom) unit. Of course, that would mean dedicating an ATEM Camera Converter and an intercom station to the task of interconnection.


Return to posts index


Chuck Pullen
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 9, 2012 at 1:03:07 pm

I think the way I stated my question has overcomplicated the issue. The converter has built in headphone/microphone jacks for comm. I was thinking about using the audio coupling “Dry Channel” on the RTS PS15 and with the proper ¼” to a 3.5 “Y” cable I might be able to interface the two systems? Just wondering if anyone has made a similar dry connection to an RTS system, and how well it works?

Thanks,

Chuck Pullen


Return to posts index

Richard Crowley
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 9, 2012 at 2:25:26 pm

I'm not sure what "converter" you are talking about?
It appears that the "audio coupling" connector on the RTS PS-15 is a simple connection to the intercom bus. If you want to just run the intercom audio one way, "simplex" (from RTS to ATEM or from ATEM to RTS) then you can use a basic cable, with appropriate attenuation and isolation, of course.

But if you want two-way (duplex) communication between RTS and ATEM, it appears that you will need to use an RTS intercom station to properly handle the two-way audio.


Return to posts index

Chuck Pullen
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 9, 2012 at 3:44:13 pm

That’s the essence of my question Mr. Crowley. The PS15 manual reads :

“The AUDIO COUPLING jack may also be used to input a
signal into the system. Use at least a 2.2 kilohm resistor in
series with the signal source to prevent loading of the RTS
Systems intercom line. Use an audio isolation transformer
to prevent ground loops.”

So in theory it could work with the proper attenuation/isolation as you mentioned.

There is also this interface device from Eartec:

http://eartec.com/SLTalk%20Interface/sltinterface.html

Which could serve the same purpose.

Chuck


Return to posts index


Justin Strauber
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 9, 2012 at 4:20:00 pm

I've had this thought. Basically what you really need is a 2-wire to 4-wire interface. They can get pricy, but there are some units out there that you can 'hack' something together. If you can get the resistance right, in theory you could just have a beltpack / userstation above the camera converter base station and simply wire the headphone out / mic in between the beltpack and Camera Converter base station.


Return to posts index

Richard Crowley
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 9, 2012 at 9:13:45 pm

Yes, the manual explicitly states that you can feed audio (such as program audio, for example) INTO the "audio coupling" port. An examination of the schematic diagram (which I was referring to) shows that the "audio coupling" is essentially a hard-wired tap directly into the intercom bus, which makes it a full-duplex port.

Although not explained in the manual, you could also use that port to feed audio (one-way) from the RTS system to the ATEM system. But you cannot use that port to accomplish DUPLEX (two-way) communication.

As others have explained, you are trying to interface a 4-wire (ATEM = separate send and receive signals) system to a 2-wire (RTS/Clearcom = combined send/receive signals) system. Several ways of doing that have been described. The most straightforward way is to use the RTS SSA-324 Analog System-to-System Adapter with an ATEM Camera Converter box.


Return to posts index

Jeff Hartman
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 9, 2012 at 4:18:08 pm

What you are actually doing here is interfacing a two-wire intercom (the RTS) to a four-wire system (the Blackmagic). The difference is this: a two-wire system has bi-directional audio, like a phone line; in a four-wire system one pair sends audio out while the second pair receives incoming audio.

The "textbook" solution, if you are using an RTS system, would be to use their SSA-324 system interface. The connection would be like this:

1) Plug the RTS party line XLR feed into the SSA's 2-wire I/O jack;

2) Connect the headphone out from the Blackmagic interface to the SSA's 4-wire in;

3) Connect the SSA's 4-wire out through an attenuator pad to the Blackmagic interface's mic in (the attenuator drops the SSA's line level down to mic level).

The SSA has two sections (A and B), so you can use this to separately tie to two Blackmagic converters.

Regards,

Jeff Hartman
Engineering Project Manager
Newport Television, Northeast


Return to posts index


Mark Walleman
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 9, 2012 at 8:49:52 pm

There's a couple ways you can go about this. One way has already been explained. The other is more of a a-la-carte method, but works with both the BM camera converter and other fiber converters.

It's built around this: http://www.studio-tech.com/product_m5132.html . This is a drop-in module (no exterior case) that is a POWERED 4 to 2-wire converter. It can power up to x3 RTS beltpacks and it works great!

There's also a box from Telecast that is a solely RTS over fiber solution: http://www.telecast-fiber.com/TR6442i-CommLink . Also works great! And is far easier obviously.

To Use with the BM Camera Converter with the Studio Tech interface: You only get 1 channel of RTS because the BM has only one intercom channel. You can add a second channel by adding parts of the next method. The next method also works with standard fiber to SDI converters.

You can accomplish this buy utilizing throwdown SDI to analog audio embedders and de-embedders.

(2) strands of fiber. (If you have a Tac-4, then you're double covered)
(2) BM Optical to SDI Converters. (Bi-directional)
(2) BM SDI to Analog Audio De-Embedders.
(2) BM Analog Audio to SDI Embedders.
(2) Studio Tech 5132's

Camera side:
Camera HD/SD-SDI -> Audio Embedder -> SDI to Optical Out.
Studio Tech 4-wire Ch-1 Out to Audio Embedder Ch-3 In. 4-wire Ch-2 Out to Audio Embedder Ch-4 In. Camera SDI embedded audio passes on Ch 1 and 2. (dip-switches on the embedder)
Optical In to SDI -> Audio De-Embedder.
Audio De-Embedder Ch-3 Out to Studio Tech 4-wire Ch-1 In. Audio De-Embedder Ch-4 Out to Studio Tech 4-wire Ch-2 In. (You can use channels 1 and 2 on the return path if desired.


For the truck side, just reverse the signal flow using the opposite setup.


However... For the price of putting all of this together... You might as well just purchase the: http://www.telecast-fiber.com/TR6442i-CommLink

Mark D. Walleman
Relay House Inc.


Return to posts index

Bob Zelin
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 10, 2012 at 1:21:26 pm

I found this thread very entertaining. Do you know why people want to buy the ATEM Camera Converter? - BECAUSE IT DOESNT COST A LOT OF MONEY. So you are offering wonderful solutions to this issue (I have a perfectly working older wired RTS system, and I don't want to keep spending all that money, so we are looking at the ATEM Camera Converter), and you guys are offering solutions from Telecast and Studio-Tech that cost a fortune.

So the real answer is NO, there is no way to quickly, and cheaply get your RTS system to work with the ATEM Camera Converter. Because as Mark just posted in his last paragraph, if function was the only concern here, you would just buy the Telecast Commlink, and be done with it.

I just did another ATEM switcher install for a big company, and spec'ed out a ClearCom intercom (wired) for their small studio, and they almost passed out when they saw the prices for the base station, beltpacks, and IFB's that they needed. Blackmagic is changing the perspective of how much things cost - and when you put in something - like a full featured intercom system - people are ready to pass out. Who knows, maybe Blackmagic will buy Telex in 2013, and we will have an 8 station intercom, compatible with the ATEM Camera converter for $1500 bucks.

Bob Zelin



Return to posts index

Chuck Pullen
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 10, 2012 at 1:59:37 pm

Thanks guys! I didn’t realize that the Camera Converter wasn’t full duplex, your explanations make the problem much clearer to me now. I think the SSA-324 would work well, and I hadn't thought of using Studio Tech products. I've already had a discussion with Joseph Electronics about the possibility of a custom solution using Studio Tech and their cabling.

And Bob…Not everyone consults for “big companies” as you put it. My work is mostly for small churches and schools. In this particular installation, the church has a perfectly good and relatively new HD ready control room and a completely functional RTS system. Now I realize in your world it just makes more sense to completely gut the whole thing and start over with the latest greatest (expensive) product from NAB, but in MY world, all I need to do is add just 1 camera out of the 300’ range of SDI cable. Asking for just an extra $1000 to add the Blackmagic Camera Converter and fiber has been a long term discussion, as this church is very protective of “God’s Money” which is a very admirable thing for church leadership. Now I would really have a hard time sleeping at night if I was constantly talking my clients into spending thousands of dollars when thanks to the good guys here at the Cow I now have several less expensive solutions…My soap box and I will take our leave!

Chuck


Return to posts index


Richard Crowley
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 10, 2012 at 3:19:14 pm

The ATEM Camera Converter IS full duplex. I understand Mr. Zelin's arguments, but don't necessarily agree with his suggested reasons. BMD is operating from a new generation of technology than the traditional intercom systems. I would argue that it is TWO generations newer. With the kind of data bandwidth they have on those fibers, throwing in intercom functionality is almost free. It is just an additional few K bytes of data along with the gigabytes of video data.

The problem comes when you have to interface that digital intercom world to the old-school, legacy analog intercom systems. BMD appears to have a rather provincial view of the world that doesn't uniformly comprehend that their equipment is only PART of a larger system comprising equipment from other vendors and using other technology and interfacing.

There is also the matter of the size of the market and what the market will bear. There is FAR more technology in a consumer $40 bluetooth headset than in the typical professional intercom station. But the economies of scale and the traditional price of professional equipment make an intercom system cost many times what a bluetooth headset sells for.

Now BMD (or perhaps a 3rd party vendor) could make a small interface box the size of the BMD Tally/GPI interface box that could interface with the common 2-wire systems like Clearcom, RTS, et.al. Consumer goods that have the level of technology required to do this cost less than $100.

You could make the argument (and my suggestion was based on the theory) that one of the ATEM Camera Converter boxes is actually the best available analog interface into the ATEM intercom system.

BMD's products are an interesting mix of products that are amazing value for the price and others that seem dramatically overpriced by comparison.


Return to posts index

Jeff Hartman
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 10, 2012 at 4:42:00 pm

I was rather surprised to see such a snarky response to fairly straightforward replies. Yes, Blackmagic gear is low-budget... but RTS decidedly isn't. For a facility that already has a full RTS system and wants to tie it into a new piece of BMD equipment, citing an RTS interface as a known-good solution is certainly not unreasonable.

Having said that, if low price is the only constraint, it's quite straightforward to build a hybrid circuit with two transformers (two Triad TY-300P, for instance), one 560 ohm resistor, and one 100 ohm potentiometer. This will achieve a fairly decent null between the BMD incoming and outgoing audio (set the potentiometer to minimize the sidetone at the camera end). Total parts cost should be under $20 from Digikey.

If you take a look at the description of the double transformer hybrid on Wikipedia's "Hybrid Coil" page, "W" would connect to the RTS coupling jack, "X" would be the BMD send audio (with an attenuator to drop it to mic level), "Z" would be the BMD receive audio, and "Y" would be the 560 ohm resistor in series with the 100 ohm potentiometer. The dots in the drawing indicate the polarity for each transformer winding, and it's essential to observe correct polarity or else the hybrid won't work correctly.

The downside is that this is a very rudimentary approach. Aside from needing some skill to build and some effort to tweak so it works decently, it lacks the automatic nulling, ducking, and dynamics control that you get with an RTS interface.


One other observation about intercoms in general: both two-wire and four-wire systems have been around for a very long time, and each has its advantages. The RTS TW system is two-wire; the digital RTS Adam is four-wire, and I happen to have installed both here. I see no significance in Blackmagic's design approach beyond the fact that since their system transmits and receives separately, the link is intrinically four-wire; there is nothing to be gained and a lot to lose by adding four-wire to two-wire conversion if you don't actually need it.


-- Jeff


Return to posts index

Chuck Pullen
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 10, 2012 at 6:01:47 pm

[Jeff Hartman] "I was rather surprised to see such a snarky response to fairly straightforward replies"

Snarky replies are his specialty! LOL

Thank you for the detailed response I am certainly going to read up on the hybrid coil and see if it’s something I want to attempt. As mentioned we have a perfectly good RTS system that I am perfectly happy with and I have no intention of abandoning any time soon. I am surprised that Blackmagic hasn’t come out with a solution to what would appear to be an obvious problem. When I started using Eartec wireless intercom equipment the very first question I had was “How can I interface this with my RTS?” Guess what, they already solved the problem before I asked the question with this: http://eartec.com/SLTalk%20Interface/sltinterface.html

Maybe Blackmagic will stop being “elitist” and start making their products to play nice with others?

Chuck


Return to posts index


Jeff Hartman
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 10, 2012 at 6:25:21 pm

[Chuck Pullen] "Maybe Blackmagic will stop being “elitist” and start making their products to play nice with others?"

I'm not sure it's fair to say they're being elitist: from a purely technical point of view, a four-wire system can outperform a two-wire system in many respects, and it's consistent with how the signals are transmitted over the fiber. Adding two-wire conversion would seriously degrade the performance when linking multiple units together, because there's a practical limit to how much gain you can create in each direction without making the system unstable and breaking into feedback.

As far as interfacing goes... the BMD actually interconnects really well into a system like our RTS Adam, or our Telex wireless base stations. I've been installing and designing intercom systems for years, and the big problem for every single one is interfacing to a dissimilar system -- especially when you have to tie into things like phone lines, camera base stations, wireless systems, and the like.

I suppose I should be grateful: at least it's a perverse sort of job security. (grin)

-- Jeff


Return to posts index

Bob Zelin
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 10, 2012 at 8:08:27 pm

Chuck writes -
Maybe Blackmagic will stop being “elitist” and start making their products to play nice with others?


Snarly Bob responds -

The headphone jack supports iPhone-compatible headsets, where the microphone works via the headphone
jack. If both an iPhone-compatible headset and external microphone are connected at the same time, the
iPhone microphone will mute and the external microphone will be used instead.

It appears that the real intention here is NOT to interface with the rest of the world (RTS, ClearCom, Eartec, Telex, Anchor, Studio-Tech, etc.) but to connect to the Blackmagic ATEM Studio Converter, to have a nice simple self contained talkback system. So you can go to Digikey and Jameco to jury rig up an interface, but it looks like Blackmagic's intentions are for you to use multiple ATEM Camera Converters, and their self contained intercom system (who needs IFB anyway !).

So maybe in the same way that they now do ProRes and DNxHD to "play nice" with the post production market - maybe they will do the same for 2 wire systems.

Bob Zelin



Return to posts index

Chuck Pullen
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 11, 2012 at 2:04:23 pm

See Bob, you CAN be helpful!

At a certain point this will become a “take what I can get” project. If I find a simple way (Several good recommendations above) to tie this into the RTS system,problem solved. If I can’t get that to work, the yes this will become a one way communication system (Like any director wants to hear from the camera people anyway) Either way, this what my budget constrains me to work with…

I never thought I would see the day that we were discussing using iPhone and Bluetooth headsets for comm.. I miss my old heavy Telex headset already!

Chuck


Return to posts index

Shaun Roemich
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 11, 2012 at 11:20:36 pm

IPhone headsets...

THOSE will be AWESOME for camera operators in a room any louder than a church sanctuary... (Snarky Shaun joins in)

I have used FRS radios as a low cost solution for live event coverage for years when the budget wouldn't support real comms. And guess what? Every time I do I swear "never again"! Not because of the radio transmission but because the headsets are AWFUL in terms of either amplitude or noise insulation so my camera guys actually have a hot clue what I'm asking for...

Wired comms with one ear headsets for my ENG style camera ops, option of one or two for my studio kit equipped ops and either for me, depending on whether I need to work with anyone in the room not on comms.

Big Dog - Technical Director - Switcher
Road Dog Media - Vancouver, BC Canada
roaddogmedia@gmail.com


Return to posts index

Scott Thomas
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 18, 2012 at 11:50:18 pm

I don't know whether it would work... I thought a while back that if I had to do this, I would try the Eartec wired Intercom adaptor (~$215). Eartec makes it to go from a wired intercom (RTS, Clearcom, Telex, etc) to the headphone jack of one of their wireless beltpacks (which use a single 2.5mm or 3.5mm plug headset plug (I'm not sure which)). I would guess that with a breakout adapter cable it would probably plug into the ATEM Camera Converter/Studio Converter.

Adaptor:
http://eartec.com/SLTalk%20Interface/sltinterface.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/723694-REG/Eartec_SLT_INT_SLT_INT_Wir...

Adaptor Plug (3.5mm or 2.5mm)
http://www.amazon.com/GTMax-Headset-Adapter-Smartphone-Converts/dp/B0046FMR...

http://www.amazon.com/2-5mm-Mobile-Headset-To-Converter/dp/B000IZCUTQ

--Scott


Return to posts index

Jef Kethley
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 21, 2012 at 10:31:17 pm

We used the Production Intercom AD903 to interface our 2wire ClearCom system into the ATEM converter world. After a little tweaking time, all works fantastic.

You can also use this same box to interface ClearCom 2Wire to RTS 4Wire. Not bad for a $300 ish box.


Return to posts index

Chuck Pullen
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on May 22, 2012 at 5:45:50 pm

Thanks guys, those are exactly the kind of solutions I am looking for!

Chuck


Return to posts index

Fernando Balbontin
Re: Interface the ATEM Camera Converter to an RTS System
on Sep 10, 2015 at 2:36:14 pm

Chuck, I was reading all of the above postings and I was wondering if you ever got the two system working together. If so, can you confirm what product you used?

Thanks

FB


Return to posts index

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
© 2017 CreativeCOW.net All Rights Reserved
[TOP]