| Tutorial: Save This Script By John Morley and Mark Suszko
• | | | |
 | Tutorial: Save This Script By John Morley and Mark Suszko
by Mark Suszko on May 3, 2012 at 3:34:14 am |
| | | |
Indie Film & Documentary  | Save This Script By John Morley and Mark Suszko
Each installment of this series is a scenario in which a writer/producer team is confronted with a problem script. The scenario, written in screenplay format, revolves around a typical client management situation that can lead to a problem script. Join John Morley and Mark Suszko in this first episode as they Save This Script!
Tutorial, Feature 05/02/2012 Author: Mark Suszko |
| | | | |
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Save This Script By John Morley and Mark Suszko by Mark Suszko on May 3, 2012 at 3:44:21 am |
The secret project, revealed!
I'm going to have to apologize to Joss for stealing his Opening Weekend thunder now... hope the movie still makes some money...
We plan a series of these, each exploring one area where folks commonly have problems. They are organized over short-form scripts for efficiency's sake, but we might go deeper, later on. Short spot scripts are often microcosms of larger projects anyway, so what you pick up here may still be of use.
John and I have a number of these drafted already, but we appreciate any feedback and suggestions on where you'd like us to go on future script topics and issues. We only ask that you not name true real names of clients or brands or anything, when you post - please keep references kind of generic, so as not to cause people grief at their day jobs, thanks.
Thanks to Tim and Stefani for giving this idea a chance. Let's see what happens.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Save This Script By John Morley and Mark Suszko by Steve Martin on May 6, 2012 at 12:15:11 pm |
Brilliant Mark!
Production is fun - but lets not forget: Nobody ever died on the video table!
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Save This Script By John Morley and Mark Suszko by Fernando Mol on May 3, 2012 at 12:43:26 pm |
"Feel free to pay her just as much as you would like."
What an ending!
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Save This Script By John Morley and Mark Suszko by Michael Locke on May 4, 2012 at 4:56:17 pm |
What?
Writing, directing, and dialog? And here I just thought you were uber-tech broadcast guys. So glad your stomach turns with bad content, and you improve on it, saving you and the project from the president. Nice to see how you danced it in front of them, since the cheapest commercials are often client-concieved and diplomacy is mandatory for any future work.
Keep it coming from the trenches, proud of you guys...
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Save This Script By John Morley and Mark Suszko by Jeff Breuer on May 10, 2012 at 3:46:58 pm |
Mark/John, this is great! Thanks for putting it together.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | @Jeff Breuer by Mark Suszko on May 10, 2012 at 5:54:58 pm |
Jeff, we're interested in any specific problems readers like you want addressed for the next installment. Just leave actual names out of it, but if you have faced a script problem, tell us about it and we might have some suggestions in the next installment.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Save This Script By John Morley and Mark Suszko by John Morley on May 25, 2012 at 3:45:56 am |
As Mark indicated, our approach to this column is still a work in progress, and any suggestions are welcome at this point.
What we plan to add going forward is some ending commentary that connects the dots on why and how we were able to "save this script."
For example, these are some thoughts on the wedding video:
Clichés got that way because they work. The cliché in this case is the illusion of a third-party endorsement created by a dramatization of someone providing advice to a friend. The trick is to add a twist to the cliché. The wedding album adds this twist along with a smile.
What works in some situations, such as retro-chic, may not work in other applications. Furthermore, a parody runs the risk of being just as offensive, hokey, or boring as the thing being parodied. So instead of making fun of our client's idea, we took it up a notch to add a richer context and specific reason for Betty to be bragging on her plumber (as opposed to being married to one).
Examples work best. Show it; don’t say it. So this script puts something important to our target audience, the perfect wedding reception. at risk. Then, no adjectives are needed to describe how this level of service saved the day.
Positive associations are also effective. Being the plumber who saved the wedding makes this plumber easy to remember and associate with something good.
--
John Morley
Author of Scriptwriting for High-Impact Videos
John@OriginalVision.com
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Save This Script By John Morley and Mark Suszko by Mark Suszko on May 25, 2012 at 5:36:51 am |
Thanks, John.... I used to do a lot of scripts in radio, since back in college... and one of my most anger-producing peeves is about forced dialog that would never happen in real life in a million years.
Nobody walks around in real life talking to a friend or neighbor out of the blue, unmotivated, about some business by spelling out their number and address, and especially not by repeating it. Stilted copy is deathly dull. And saying phone numbers in spots today is I think a waste unless they are mnemonics of some sort.
In the original plumber-supplied script, the ladies talk like Stepford Wives, not real people. Their language is inauthentic to any kind of characterization you'd expect. They are just a "Mary Sue" puppet for whatever the client originally wanted to say by narrator, but he thought a dialog would be more "fun".
Dialog is a reactive, inter-active, evolving process, not just trading memorized speeches back and forth like it's still 1930's radio theatre.
In less than 30 seconds, we have a lot of work to do. We have to create characters and a reasonably believable world for them to inhabit, and a situation for them to deal with. And you can't get away with that old stage trick of starting out the scene by having one of them say "well, here we are in (whatever)...." I have NEVER heard a real person ever say that anywhere. You know where you are, if you're not senile.
You're going to be skeptical, but really, when I work on a spot like this, or even a training video, I'm not happy until I find a way to wedge an abbreviated Campbellian "Hero's Journey" story arc into it.
Some of it might have to be telegraphed by the art direction or other nonverbal visual cues or sound effects and music. You have parallel story-telling tracks going on in any GOOD video: you have the obvious dialog and main character action happening, but also the visuals in the foreground and background, and actions implied just offscreen, all of that working together, the parts leverage each other. That's when you're using ALL the power of the medium to full advantage, not just reading a radio play to a camera.
So when we go to the wedding idea, we've created a legitimate reason for two people who know each other to spontaneously start discussing plumbing in front of us. We have a plot arc right out of Aristotle's "Poetics", with a deadline and an obstacle to overcome, and a catharsis for the people in the story and us the viewers. The incongruity of the plumber in the album is an awesome "hook", and is both humorous and it's an instant puzzle for the curious viewer/listener to decode. You feel rewarded for attention when you "get" the punchline and "solve" the riddle. I feel that aids overall message retention.
We could have also written this as a testimonial from one customer straight to an off-camera interviewer, more documentary style. That would have been my back-up plan if the budget was lower than it already was. But it's that unexpected VISUAL of the plumber in the wedding party photo that is the entire key. Sometimes, you think of that first, and write "backwards" from that to create the conditions that make the ending happen. But you can't bend reality too far just to make the whole timeline work. Then you get the Plumber's "original" script again.
| | | | |
| |
|