Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO: Final Cut Pro TutorialsFinal Cut Pro ForumFCP ArticlesApple Final Cut ServerBasics ForumTraining

Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?

Cow Forums : Apple Final Cut Pro
Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?
by jack westburg on Jun 26, 2008 at 10:13:53 pm

Does the "23.98" frame rate even exist?
Is anything truly shot/captured/rendered as 23.98?

You may answer "yes of course, just look at the Clip info in final cut, your sequence setting, or movie inspector in quicktime - it says 23.98!"

I have a self taught background and I've tried to research this as much as possible - books, web, colleagues. The more I work in video the more I get the impression every display in every program on every VTR that says "23.98" is just abbreviating "23.976"
Is there any truth to that statement?

Is a 23.98 FCP Sequence actually 23.976?
Is the 23.98 setting on the DVW-D2000 actually playing/recording at 23.976?

This frustratingly confusing when an app comes along like After Effects that will actually let you make a comp that is any frame, including 23.98 and 23.976.
(a 23.98 render from AE will have frame jitter when played in a 23.98 sequence in FCP and eQ)

Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

Re: Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?
by Reid Caulfield on Jun 27, 2008 at 3:05:26 am

I believe 23.98 is shorthand for 23.976. The more important question is, if this is NOT the case - if they ARE different things, in other words - is there rounding going on. My inclinations is to say that this is not the case. Actual rounding would be mathematically disastrous, especially on long shows. Presume 23.976.

Reid C



Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

Re: Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?
by David Roth Weiss on Jun 27, 2008 at 3:18:11 am

[Reid Caulfield] "I believe 23.98 is shorthand for 23.976."

Indeed!!! That is the case...

David Roth Weiss
Director/Editor
David Weiss Productions, Inc.
Los Angeles

POST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™


A forum host of Creative COW's Apple Final Cut Pro, Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.


Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index


Re: Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 27, 2008 at 4:36:38 am

You are teaching yourself well. 29.97 is really 29.970. If you enter 23.98 in any other program other than final cut, it will mess up your movie as it should really be 23.976 and that includes Quicktime. But you already know that.

23.98 just rolls off the tongue a bit better I guess.




Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

Re: Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?
by Reid Caulfield on Jun 27, 2008 at 5:40:39 am

Though I haven't tried it in awhile, and being as how my main audio environment of choice is Nuendo (as opposed to Pro Tools, which I also use), I remember the first time I did a "23.98" project in Nuendo. Slight drift all the way through due to the discrepancy, but there was no other choice, as I recall. The app allowed for entering a rate in the field but wouldn't go more than 2 decimal places. Resulted in me having to do cuts every minute or 2 & move audio by subframes to keep absolute sync. They seem to have fixed it. That's the kind of havoc the second & third decimal places can play. Thanks for the affirmation of the 23.98/23.976 question.

Reid C



Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

Re: Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?
by gary adcock on Jun 27, 2008 at 1:05:18 pm

[Jeremy Garchow] "23.98 just rolls off the tongue a bit better I guess. "

then what do we do with Sony?

they shorten it in the display menus in many of their cameras to just 23.9....

gary adcock
Studio37
HD & Film Consultation
Post and Production Workflows
Inside look at the IoHD




Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index


Re: Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 27, 2008 at 2:06:35 pm

[gary adcock] "they shorten it in the display menus in many of their cameras to just 23.9...."

That rolls off the tongue even better!

I know why we can't, but it's still too bad we couldn't just have standardized to whole frame rates when moving to HD.

We can rebuild him, we have the technology.

Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

Re: Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?
by Dave LaRonde on Jun 27, 2008 at 3:05:56 pm

[gary adcock] "...they shorten it in the display menus in many of their cameras to just 23.9...."

Yeah, and I don't like it one bit. I think it's a reprehensible and misleading practice to round off a frame rate. It can confuse far too many people.

You hear that, Apple? Your "23.98" label STINKS!

Dave LaRonde
Sr. Promotion Producer
KCRG-TV (ABC) Cedar Rapids, IA

Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

Re: Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?
by jack westburg on Jun 27, 2008 at 6:33:34 pm

Thanks all for the confirmation!

All the abbreviation in formats and framerates really gets annoying.



Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index


cowcowcowcowcow
Re: Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?
by Peter Kiwitt on Jun 28, 2008 at 1:03:31 pm

I believe that 23.976 is also a rounded number. For simplicity's sake we calculate 24-.024=23.976 and 60-.060=59.94 but the actual formulas are 24x1000/1001=23.976024 and 60x1000/1001=59.940060. So 23.98 can be seen as the correct frame listing to round all rates from six decimal places to two.

Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

Re: Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?
by Bill Dewald on Jun 30, 2008 at 6:10:13 am

That just blew my mind. Thanks!



Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

Re: Is 23.98 always 23.976 in disguise?
by Peter Kiwitt on Jun 30, 2008 at 1:25:45 pm

Here are shorter formulas...

What we write: FrameRate*.999

What is precise: FrameRate/1.001


Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

<< PREVIOUS THREAD   •   VIEW ALL THREADS   •   PRINT   •   NEXT THREAD >>


FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINEDVDsBOOKSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

© CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved.

[Top]