smaller increment for time code

	smaller increment for time code by craig hellen (fnkydesign) on Jun 26, 2008 at 2:53:47 pm hey all I have a cool new project idea (just for me) taking on the audio video syncronisation to make a track out of the sound that goes with the video... we are gonna make up the track itself using wavs in ablton live and we have already started building up some interesting rhythms Theoretically i should be able to take the in and out points of each wav file placed on the timeline in ableton, and transpose those figures on to the clips i have in final cut... but ableton seems to be able to work a decimal place lower than final cut, is there any way of changing this so i can work from a lower time increment in final cut or am i gonna have to cheat a bit? We got some cool audio and it should look cool, i promise (if its any good ) ill post back on this thread with the finiahed product! Cheereo Craig Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

	Re: smaller increment for time code by David Roth Weiss on Jun 26, 2008 at 4:42:27 pm [Ed Dooley] "If what you mean is sub-frame audio editing, Soundtrack Pro does that." Ed, I think you'll be surprised to to know tat FCP also has sub-frame sychronization of audio and video. It's described on page 308 in the online manual. FCP will allow you slip audio in increments of 100th of a frame. David David Roth Weiss Director/Editor David Weiss Productions, Inc. Los Angeles POST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™ A forum host of Creative COW's Apple Final Cut Pro, Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums. Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

	Re: smaller increment for time code by Eric Susch on Jun 26, 2008 at 5:07:33 pm You can also move your audio keyframes sub-frame if you zoom in far enough in the timeline. ____________________________________ Eric Susch www.LetsKnit2gether.com www.EricSusch.com Follow me on twitter @EricSusch Come and see our presentation at the New Media Expo in Las Vegas. Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

	Re: smaller increment for time code by gary adcock on Jun 26, 2008 at 3:42:22 pm [craig hellen] "ableton seems to be able to work a decimal place lower than final cut, " I guess my question is - in video there is not really need to edit audio within the time of one frame or field. (about 60 times per second) that allows for 3600 beats / breaks per minute. if you need more than that you need to look at some other tool. gary adcock Studio37 HD & Film Consultation Post and Production Workflows Inside look at the IoHD Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index