Reference Chart (Only The Best Fallacies)

Due to recent excesses I feel compelled to post further references.

http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/rhetological-fallacies...

(obligatory link to previous post in what may be a series)
http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/335/27465#27465

Franz.

I've made a chart, I think this proves beyond any doubt that FCPX is faster than Legacy



Steve Connor
"The ripple command is just a workaround for not having a magnetic timelinel"
Adrenalin Television

Wait, wait, WAIT...

Everybody stop.

I need some time to go find a clever "cut and paste" graphic here so I can play.

Obviously simply making arguments based on one's own thinking - writing them in the open for everyone to read, judge and argue against - is inadequate.

Silly for so many of us not to understand that what we've really needed here is a GUIDE so that we dimwits can become "educated" about how to think and reason.

And how foolish of me as an individual to have expected that the regular posters here (on both sides of the issues) were already smart enough to do that for themselves.

Seriously, if you don't like what someone posts here - the standard in this forum has always been to stand up in your own words and tell us WHY you're right and they (or we) are wrong.

Cut and paste logic instruction? Really? Well, perhaps this stuff is brand new to you, so you figure it's also new to everyone else?

Fine. Here's an additional exercise that will help you even more! Go back and find comments people here have made that you think FIT your cut and paste poster thinking - and tell us why.

Yeah, I know.

That's takes effort and possibly even some original thinking - which this forum has benefited from on both sides.

Unfortunately, that's way harder than pasting a graphic.

My 2 cents.

"Before speaking out ask yourself whether your words are true, whether they are respectful and whether they are needed in our civil discussions."-Justice O'Connor

[Franz Bieberkopf] ""Don't talk unless you can improve the silence." - Jorge Luis Borges"

I brute force this silence by just skipping over posts.

The statement "I find X to be faster than Legacy" is quite reasonable. It would be better if modified by the clause "in my/some workflows (describe here.)"

It is not reasonable to make the statement " X is the fastest NLE in the world. Period."

It is reasonable to make the statement that "I find the Mac/OSX environment to be superior for (reasons or conditions go here.)"

It is not reasonable to make the statement "It is well known that Mac/OSX is the best all around computer."

If you can't understand the difference between these 2 types of arguments perhaps you should consider giving another look at Franz's chart.

Herb Sevush
Zebra Productions
---------------------------
nothin' attached to nothin'
"Deciding the spine is the process of editing" F. Bieberkopf

[Bill Davis] "Wait, wait, WAIT...

Everybody stop.

I need some time to go find a clever "cut and paste" graphic here so I can play.

Obviously simply making arguments based on one's own thinking - writing them in the open for everyone to read, judge and argue against - is inadequate.

Silly for so many of us not to understand that what we've really needed here is a GUIDE so that we dimwits can become "educated" about how to think and reason.

And how foolish of me as an individual to have expected that the regular posters here (on both sides of the issues) were already smart enough to do that for themselves.

Seriously, if you don't like what someone posts here - the standard in this forum has always been to stand up in your own words and tell us WHY you're right and they (or we) are wrong.

Cut and paste logic instruction? Really? Well, perhaps this stuff is brand new to you, so you figure it's also new to everyone else?

Fine. Here's an additional exercise that will help you even more! Go back and find comments people here have made that you think FIT your cut and paste poster thinking - and tell us why.

Yeah, I know.

That's takes effort and possibly even some original thinking - which this forum has benefited from on both sides.

Unfortunately, that's way harder than pasting a graphic.

My 2 cents."

Dear Bill,

Do take your 2 cents and go out and buy yourself a sense of humour with it.

Please.

Alex Hawkins
Canberra, Australia

LOL!

Is the Cheetah cross platform?

Herb Sevush
Zebra Productions
---------------------------
nothin' attached to nothin'
"Deciding the spine is the process of editing" F. Bieberkopf

What were you feeding the Cheetah?

If you place a Bison 300 yards away from each the Cheetah will run very fast but FCPX starts to background render. FCP legacy, on the other hand, will eventually produce a Yak.

[Steve Connor] "[Craig Seeman] "FCP legacy, on the other hand, will eventually produce a Yak."

I firmly believe Bruce is there in FCPX, somewhere!
"

I heard its name is Bill now...

For the youngsters. Witch logic:

[John Kaley] "For the youngsters. Witch logic:
"

Who are you who are so wise in the ways of science?