|
Hi Shawn,
AFP is well optimized and usually offers pretty decent performances. From a single metaLAN Server to metaLAN clients, I would therefore expect marginal differences (a cluster of 2 or 3 servers would be different!). Still, metaLAN will provide block-level connection and the ability to throttle the individual clients (in addition to giving you access to the ProjectStore and cluStore functionality).
Using a Windows server, metaLAN performance to Mac clients would be significantly better using metaLAN than SMB...
I've asked the guys to run some tests and I will share when I have them...
Bernard
| |