Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT)
by Jason Harris
on
Apr 24, 2009 at 2:21:06 am
ok i will admit adobe has its strengths, and dont get me wrong I LOVE some of their products, but i have been seeing a downhill slide in certain things, and please lets not tell me its MY system, besides the TEN we tried it on here, numerous people have reported this across the platform of pro users.
the starting basics are
system used (FYI this is a system that is not available to the general public yet, our parent company does a lot of work with the GOV so we have some systems we test for them on occasion)
XP on all systems (NO VISTA) we have enough issues with ADOBE without M$ global F#$%up being in the mix!
4.9 GHZ ZX core
4 GB RAM
2 TB RAID 0 drive
adobe premiere pro CS4 (and also tried cs3 with a bit better results)
ok so i take the source footage, which was shot on a sony camera, not sure which one though, i edit it, then i make the output video, but for SOME REASON all the output videos are "jumpy" i mean i know a cameraman sometimes shakes (especially when doing these sorts of sports events) but i REFUSE in fact the SOURCE footage also refuses to show this.
something with the encoding is screwed up, i dont know if adobe thinks we want to wait 25 minutes for the encoding of a 4 minute video to find out it got screwed up (our company is currently looking for alternatives after this mess up)
one thing i SUSPECTED was the Frame rate was 25 fps in the source, and adobe was making a 29.97 frame rate output, however when i adjusted this i saw a bit of a change but not enough for a pro video
we have used
MPEG 1 (850 MB)
WMV (45 MB)
FLV (12 MB)
none of them show any improvement
does anyone have any suggestions, the encoding time clearly got better when we tried CS3 and that encoder, but as for the shakiness it still exists, ill be happy to post a link so people can watch the FLV clip, any suggestions would be great, pretty sad for adobe to let its products get released with such major production bugs such as the encoder being so slow and its molesting video during encoding!
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Eric Jurgenson on Apr 24, 2009 at 12:33:47 pm
By "Jumpy", do you mean "Flickery"? Or is the footage actually jumping around on the screen?
To get the best results, your project (sequence) settings should match your camera settings (resolution, aspect ratio, frame rate, progressive or interlaced scan).
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Mike Cohen on Apr 24, 2009 at 1:19:15 pm
Yes, please give more details of project settings. Is this HDV video?
Premiere, to the new user, can cause some grief even on the super top secret WOPR computer. But once you get used to it it is a brilliant tool. Rendering WMV especially takes time - 25 minutes is not a long time.
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 24, 2009 at 6:15:00 pm
Eric
I guess what i mean is it LOOKS like the cameraman was shaking his camera, the video is not JUMPING persay, the footage just looks i dont know lol, should i post a flv file so you all may look at it, im not judging premiere right away, i am certainly not new to DV editing, however this is sad,
25 minutes for a 4 minute clip (wow i have seen vegas and avid do it in like 2 minutes before!)
ok ill post a flv and let you guys see whats happening before we go further
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Lucas Windsor on Apr 24, 2009 at 3:42:14 pm
Sorry you have problems, but I have been using Premiere for seven years without almost any major issues. The software itself is just as rock solid as any other popular video editor. I use Final Cut Pro as well and they both run pretty solid.
Something to check out by Paul Thurston on Apr 25, 2009 at 10:10:55 pm
Hi Jason,
I carefully read your hardware/software system. Some suggestions:
1. OS... you have CS4 on WIN XP system. That would do it. Even if it's the 64-bit WIN XP... You have to install CS4 in Windows Vista 64-bit Ultimate. Don't waste your time with other versions of WIN software... they can work, but you will suffer if you use those other versions.
2. 4GB of RAM for CS4 is too restrictive. The rule of thumb is 2Gigs of RAM for every processor the OS detects. Too little RAM will make you suffer... it will cause Premier to crash in well-understood programming subroutines too.
Also, is the RAM the right type? All most everybody gets this part right, but then again, you have to check. Some motherboards, believe it or not, have clear restrictions on what type, amount and slot position RAM is to be installed. Not all motherboards are designed to have RAM in all the RAM slots available.
3. CS4 seems to like a minimum of two physical processors installed in two physical slots. So if your motherboard has slots for two processors, you'll be happy if you have processors on all those slots. If you have multicore processors in those slots, you will do even better.
4. You may have a great RAID-0 that gives you great bandwidth, but did you check the speed of your C-drive. CS4 resides on the C-Drive, and so it's important to check how many MB/s is this drive giving you. You want a C-drive that gives you at least 50 MB/s. If the C-drive is slower than 50MB/s, you will suffer.
5. Finally, are the chassis, motherboard, power supply, fans, and other peripherals optimized? Some chassis are just not cool (meaning the internal air flow is restricted causing internal heat to build up... that's bad news.) Is the motherboard designed for video editing? Some are and work wonderfully. Is the power supply able to handle correctly the amperage requirements of the electronics? In other words, can it supply the number of Watts required? Some power supplies have three or four rails (circuits) and if you connect all the high wattage stuff to only one circuit, you'll be sad, quite often I might add. Are the fans helping keep things cool? Sometimes you wonder. Are all the softwares running with the proper software updates? If you installed QuickTime, then Premiere, THEN updated QuickTime... bad news. Once Premier is installed, you don't update QuickTime. If QuickTime is set to update automatically, you'll be sad and WILL suffer when it updates.
Regards,
Paul
-----------------------------------------------
Paul Thurston
Producer
Chile
Something to check out II by Paul Thurston on Apr 26, 2009 at 1:03:40 am
Here’s something else,
If you captured the video via Firewire and your timeline setup is not for PAL DV video, the video will flicker on playback. PAL DV has the video fields reversed from NTSC DV video. So it you start with a DV timeline that is for NTSC framerate, the PAL video will playback with fields reversed even if the media is forced to playback at 29.97 fps.
If the video was shot in PAL and your timeline uses a DV PAL setup and upon playback it still jumps or appears as the fields are reversed, then you have two options.
1. Put the video on a PAL DV timeline and export the sequence. Edit using only the exported sequence.
2. Use After Effects to reverse the fields of the media and Edit using only the exported sequence in your PAL DV timeline.
If your computer has a video capture card, AJA Xena or BlackMagic, you captured uncompressed, you used a PAL timeline setup that works with one of these cards, and it still appears the PAL playback has fields reversed, customer service for the card is in your future.
Exporting video that has the field order reversed will greatly increase render times.
-Paul
-----------------------------------------------
Paul Thurston
Producer
Chile
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Tim Kolb on Apr 27, 2009 at 12:51:41 pm
Jason? Do you have that link for us?
Paul's input is all correct of course, XP is simply a roadblock to Adobe's software getting the RAM it needs to run well...even CS3 ran far better on machines that could recognize more RAM.
On encode...the only way a framerate is getting changed is if you specified that that be the case in the encoder settings...so check those...though the image physically "jumping" as if the camera was shaking is different than it stuttering.
There are a lot of users who do run this software and if this was a problem in the app, I'd think we'd have heard about it by now.
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 27, 2009 at 8:56:28 pm
hello everyone
I am sorry for the dealy ,mwe have been busy testing vegas pro, and avid (which are proving to be TEN TIMES faster and MORE reliable then premiere, right now i just want to get a good copy of this video outputted, then cs4 can be done,
there are faster ways to get reliable production done in my ho
here is a link to a ZIP file of the FLV output of Premiere pro, sorry its a zip, but cannot upload just flv apparently
if you have any sugfgestions please let me know (i dont even care how long the encoder takes, as long as its a decent outputted file (or files) because it will be the LASt
as for the specs, while not concerned to much with all that, i did check with the gurus, they all said specs are running where they need to be, as for vista 90% of consumers contact out IT division to have it REMOVED from their pcs, AND NONE of our business clients will install it whatsoever (and we have over 300 including the GOV) so i dont think anymore needs to be said on that!
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 28, 2009 at 1:08:15 am
oh and FYI, as for the excessive moderation on this forum im not sure ill be sticking around, once an verification email is responded to and the key is generated that should be plenty, its a bit controlling and CHILDISH to see such long post delays due to the excessive moderation on this forum
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Eric Jurgenson on Apr 28, 2009 at 12:39:17 pm
Jason,
you've got so much going on in this clip, it's hard to tell what is a technical issue and what is intentional. But let's presume that this is intended to be a straightforward edit with cuts and dissolves, and all the positional and temporal jumps, and the wierd color transitions are caused by a glitch in the machine.
In that case, you are running Premiere on the wrong system, dude. None of this stuff is normal, and I've never come across this type of problem, personally or in the forums.
In fact, if I weren't a naturally trusting soul, I would suspect that you are pulling our leg.
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 28, 2009 at 2:08:57 pm
eric
no pulling of the leg, it is indeed a sad day when we cannot produce a video (i didnt say it was simple at all) with some fx, the jumping and jittering has to be in the output, the source files dont show that at all!
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Eric Addison on Apr 28, 2009 at 3:37:06 pm
Jason,
I'm with Eric - I've been using CS4 since it was released and have not seen it produce anything like that.
system used (FYI this is a system that is not available to the general public yet, our parent company does a lot of work with the GOV so we have some systems we test for them on occasion)
I have to wonder if that has something to do with why you are having some trouble. It could be caused by some conflict with something in your system.
XP on all systems (NO VISTA) we have enough issues with ADOBE without M$ global F#$%up being in the mix!
You know, I've heard this from so many people, but I've got Vista 32 on my laptop and Vista 64 on my edit workstation and they work great. PPro has no problems with them, and I've had no real issues with anything else as well. I think that a lot of the problems with Vista have been addressed.
I watched the clip and can see what you're talking about - if it doesn't jump like that in the raw footage, then something is happening in the encode...I've just no idea what. Could it be that there was a bad install?
Maybe I missed it, but did you say what format the original footage was? Also, you matched those settings in the output (i.e. the frame rate's the same, etc.)?
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 28, 2009 at 5:03:34 pm
erics
i agree it MIGHT not be a vista/xp thing, and the specs on this pc are off the chart, but we have used the same source footage on pcs that are more MAINSTREAM with the same results
heres the missing info for you
SOURCE VIDEO
ALL CLIPS
Frame rate (25.0 fps)
codec MPG
video size (640X480 (1.0)
audio 32000 hz compressed mono
hope this helps as this is the output settings
Frame rate (25.0 fps)
codec WMV,FLV,MPG,AVI (tried them all)
WMV for example
video size (720X480, 25 fps
audio 4 kbps, 8 khz mono
compressed, VBR, 2 pass, avg 1500.00 [kpbs]
win media codec 9
two pass video
might add soem light to the subject
lol
wait till you see what vegas did with the same footage and the TIME shaved using it!
I AM AN OPTIMISTIC person if this is me screwing up ill be humbled, but i need some guidance, im all ears
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Eric Addison on Apr 28, 2009 at 6:39:51 pm
Is there any way you could post the source video some where for download? Even just a short clip would be useful in that some of us could encode it and see if we get the same results...maybe try http://www.yousendit.com/ to pass along the file...
I really would like to continue working with adobe, it is unlike them to have glitches, and i do love the interface, in the past i have done some great work with them.
I tried vegas pro studio for like 3 hours today, but its very clunky (to each his own) and not overall impressive, loved the way premiere made projects come to life, if i can get this snafu figured out i will probably return to CS3 its more stable, but has all the same features.
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 29, 2009 at 7:23:25 pm
ok so here we are
i did find a 30.0 fps on one of the videos (this was taken with a TRIPOD) so no camera shake should be apparent
I set up a sequence for NTSC 29.97 (close enough) and outputted a file, i noticed "some ticks" in it but not as bad as before
i also took the SAME file and converted it using MOV quicktime 4:3 same resolotion and same framerate 29.97 fps
the resulting mov file was MUCH smaller, i added some fx and i outputted another version of an flv file
all settings on two files were identical
Please keep in mind i am only trying to find what WORKLS to make do with what we have, if adobe cannot work with this let me know, i have so much editing to do, i would like to try and stick it out, once i get the "ticks and shakes" to go away i think all will be fine
thanks to everyone who helped and is continuing to help me
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jon Barrie on Apr 29, 2009 at 1:06:59 am
640x480 with 25fps is not a standard format,
how was this footage recorded?
I think there is something going on with the MPEG-2 style of recording (long GOP) conflicting in the export process.
Have you tried to reinstall?
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 29, 2009 at 1:12:33 am
jon
i realize its not "industry standard" but this really would be a poor excuse for adobe not to handle it, adobe is supposed to be so "all powerful" that it handles EVERYTHING
reinstalls do not work, and are a waste of time (but we did it 5 times already on each machine, will not go through another unless given very good cause as to why)
it was on a sony cam thats all i know sorry
if adobe cannot "handle" such a simple request, can you give me an idea of a software where they actually let you edit footage on such a simple level
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jon Barrie on Apr 29, 2009 at 1:22:06 am
Hi Jason,
Please understand that we are all stumped by this. we are only trying to help. asking questions is how we get a clearer picture on the situation.
When I say 640x480 with 25fps is not a standard format, I mean no camera to my knowledge shoots NTSC frame size with PAL frame rate. Not that the camera is not professional.
I've worked with Adobe Products for years and they do support more formats than most, I'm downloading your link to the original footage. I'll get back to you about the findings.
- Jon
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 29, 2009 at 1:27:16 am
jon
thanks for hanging in with me
as i said f you find anything be sure to let me know, i just ran into a brick wall trying to load avid, i am sure the footage is not "par"" with pro, but we do with what we have, as for ntsc and pal all i know about that is the stuff on settings on a dvd player lol
i know that sounds stupid but alas, my skills come from the audio realm
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Eric Addison on Apr 29, 2009 at 2:05:02 am
Jason,
Okay, I ran some tests and yeah - that footage is tough to deal with. PPro doesn't really like it. Part of the problem is that it's no where near professional quality. The data rate on a normal DV AVI file is 3.6 MB/sec...the rate on your footage - 355 KB/sec. That's pretty low.
PPro is setup for professional footage. Using consumer footage like this can yield less then desirable results. I'm not a big car guy (that's my brother so forgive me if I get this analogy wrong), but it's like you have a really high-end sports car and you're putting low quality gas in it...
That being said, I was able to export out a WMV file that didn't jump around. I did it by first opening the file in Windows Movie Maker and exporting out a new DV AVI file that was set up for PAL (to keep the 25fps) and 4:3.
Once that exported, I dropped the file into PPro, and exported out the WMV file.
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Eric Addison on Apr 29, 2009 at 2:37:39 am
What I did was use Windows Movie Maker and set the output settings as a 4:3 PAL file using the DV AVI codec. If you're on a Mac, then use the PAL DV codec for your Quicktime files. That should yield you something better to use, and something Premiere Pro will play with better.
Then set up a project in Premiere Pro that is DV PAL, and you should be good. I'd run a test to make sure it all works before you encode all that footage. The only problem would be if you need something with NTSC standards because your footage is 25fps, not 29.97, you could run into problems there. But if you are putting this on the web, it shouldn't matter.
As for using and XL2 next time, you should be good to go...you should have no problems with that footage.
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jon Barrie on Apr 29, 2009 at 5:09:52 am
Hi Jason,
There is no need to get your hands on any other software other than what you already get with CS4.
1. Open the Adobe Media Encoder, as a stand alone app.
2. Click on the Add button, select the first mpg clip
3. Set the Format to Quicktime, Preset to PAL DV
4. Click on Add button again and select all the rest of the clips.
5. They should all have the same settings applied to them all.
6. Hit the Start Queue button,
Once the renders are done they can be imported to PPro and edited properly.
The footage you are starting with is in a poor format that is running a very small data rate. The progressive nature of the recording makes the footage stutter, the camera seems to not have a stabiliser on or at all again making it stutter and jumpy, the fact that it's MPG means the GOP format is not suitable for editing. I think this camera is meant to be used for instant record/upload to web and not for editing.
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 29, 2009 at 5:52:11 am
jon
im guessing your right by all that
so you think that CS4 is still the way to go (once all files are properly converted that is?
(truth be known we only wanted to edit this footage for web upload lol, didnt know it would ever become so involved, do you think its wise to use CS4 encoder, that is the reason i was really dissapointed with CS4 in the first place SLOW encoding (im talking like 30 minutes for some files)
can i use the power converter with quicktime pal settings?
ITS MUCH FASTER lol
ill try to do one file while i wait for a response
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Eric Addison on Apr 29, 2009 at 5:58:51 am
Jason,
I ran a test using Media Encoder CS4, but the clip that it produced (very quickly by the way - less then a minute) was still playing jerky. I think Adobe Media Encoder has issues with the footage, but you should give it a shot.
I looked at the image you posted, and I would use the Quicktime selection out of those choices.
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 29, 2009 at 6:33:35 am
ok same issues with me
the outputted file took less then 30 seconds (very impressive or so i thought) and was 90+ mb
I did the quicktime setting in power coverter making sure it stayed at 4:3 and the frame rate was at 24
i put the project (new one in premiere) settings as pal DV and opened a new sequence, the video i got from encoder was all jumpy, but the one i got from power converter was almost perfect (but seemed jsut a BIT slow) who knows
oh one more thing, the converted file out of power pro was only like 3.0 mb, so maybe that setting is not what we are looking for, this outputted a 640X480 video file
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jon Barrie on Apr 29, 2009 at 6:39:19 am
Hi Jason,
You need to match the frame rates from the original. If you alter the frame rate you create jumpy stutter issues. this is rule of video.
Glad to see it's all working to some effect.
I noticed that the original footage is not true 25fps. it holds a frame every 2nd or 3rd frame for one frame. How did you get the footage from the camera to the computer again?
- Jon :)
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 29, 2009 at 6:43:22 am
jon
all footage is taken via readers in teh servers inserting high capacity memory sticks that come from the camcorders (cameras) themselves, a file transfer is done to a folder where the source footage is backed up then the cards are erased
so i ned a 24 frame rate is what your saying, right?
well the sequence should be
640X480 resolution
24 fps
if i am following you lol
ok awaiting, and thanks everyone for getting to the mysterys
we still might ahve some gremlins (is the files supposed to be that small)
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jon Barrie on Apr 29, 2009 at 6:50:01 am
The original footage dictates the rest of the workflow. If the recording was 25fps you need to work in projects with 25fps, the frame rate should be matched too, but there is some flexibility with that, keep to a preset format like PAL DV Standard for your stuff.
If you do convert the original footage then the conversion must stick with the same frame rate. Staying with the same frame size (640x480) as the original is going to maintain the best sharpness of the image.
Adobe Cs4 is a complicated set of tools for trained professionals and can be daunting and frustrating to those that don't understand the theories of Video and Editing, so hats off to you for asking, providing material and working it out. You've in effect experienced more than a course teaches in a month. ;)
- Jon :)
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 29, 2009 at 2:38:32 pm
jon
i do appreciate all your praise
and yes i do have quite a bit of AUDIO experience (being in broadcasting for many years) the video part seems just like an addon to all that, as part of it still is the audio mixing
I will try your suggestions
I will post back
Besides the stutter mistakes can i get your opinion on the vid, i felt i used aDOBE PREMIERE FAIRLY INTUITIVLEY FOR THE FIRST VIDEO!
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 29, 2009 at 7:24:37 pm
ok so here we are
i did find a 30.0 fps on one of the videos (this was taken with a TRIPOD) so no camera shake should be apparent
I set up a sequence for NTSC 29.97 (close enough) and outputted a file, i noticed "some ticks" in it but not as bad as before
i also took the SAME file and converted it using MOV quicktime 4:3 same resolotion and same framerate 29.97 fps
the resulting mov file was MUCH smaller, i added some fx and i outputted another version of an flv file
all settings on two files were identical
Please keep in mind i am only trying to find what WORKLS to make do with what we have, if adobe cannot work with this let me know, i have so much editing to do, i would like to try and stick it out, once i get the "ticks and shakes" to go away i think all will be fine
thanks to everyone who helped and is continuing to help me
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jon Barrie on Apr 29, 2009 at 11:32:10 pm
From the two clips you uploaded the mov converted one looks fine, at the quality of the flv file it looks like how it should.
If you are working with progressive frame rates you should keep working in those. frame rate is crucial - can't stress that enough.
You can make a custom desktop mode editing preset where you can set the frame size, the frame rate, audio sample rates etc to match the properties of the captured footage. But always convert this type of footage to an editable frame accurate, each frame is a complete self contained frame that doesn't rely on other frames to work out the compressed chroma/luma information (long GOP - MPEG).
Premiere Elements has the codecs for consumer formats like MPEG-2 and MOD from JVC Everio cameras, etc and works with them better. Only draw back to Elements is that it is only on the PC. But you can use it to convert your footage, it's not that expensive either.
(the link you provided in last post doesn't link to it, the first post does though)
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on Apr 30, 2009 at 8:07:45 pm
Jon
A crazy thought
couldnt i convert all the footage and RENAME it with the SAME names as adobe already sees,
then open the project (the file we had issues with) in adobe and redirect the path to the footage, this would prevent having to knock out all the work on that vid
crazy i know, but it MIGHT work right, after all its just filenames!
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jon Barrie on Apr 30, 2009 at 11:08:06 pm
Jason,
No that is not crazy - actually quite a common process. The problem with it working immediately and not as a one by one file relink case is that the file extension is different, so you may get a warning each time you force a relink.
But that is the way to do it and keep the edits you've made.
Just so long as the frame rate is the same as the edited versions and the absolute first and last frames of all the clips are exactly the same = same duration, then it will all come together nicely.
- Jon ;)
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Jason Harris on May 1, 2009 at 5:26:10 am
jon
i knew it was wishful thinking but i will keep trying tomorrow
what happens now is
i CONVERT ALL files that are used in the project,
then i go to the timeline and click "reveal in project"
then i click "replace footage" to each file
the jitters are going away but so is some of the clips, it will start to play on the timeline with the first clip, but once it gets past the transition to the second that clip starts to play then just gos to black for some reason, i am also noticing diagonal bars showing up wherever i replace the clips on timeline, i have never seen these before
im sure its close, just a few more things to work out, but it looks like this footage conversion may be the ticket after all
Re: Adobe Premiere (A DISSAPOINTMENT) by Alex Udell on May 1, 2009 at 5:38:42 pm
Hiya...
Diagonal bars on a clip or transition in the sequence is an indication that the Clip event on the timeline is of a longer duration than the media file it's connected to.
Sounds like something is not quite right with the conversion....with regards to the frame rates...where the new sources you are connecting to are too short...
that's also why things are going black....
you need to compare the original source versus the converted source in the timeline and see if the converted source plays a little too fast...