Star Trek 2k?

So I read on another forum that the latest Star Trek movie was edited 2k. . .can anyone confirm or deny this?
I'd be amazed if this was true, and am curious about it. I watched the movie at IMAX, and I was REALLY amazed at how crisp and beautiful the picture looked. I mean, I was trying to scrutinize, and I couldn't see anything that looked like pixels or even film grain (unlike Transformers, where the pixels were obvious at first--obviously digital projection--and distracting until my attention was diverted to just how bad a movie it was).
Honestly, before I heard the 2k rumor, I was wondering if there was such a thing as '8k' projection, particularly for IMAX films.
Anyone got some info?

Watch the special feature that comes on the standard DVD that can be rented. You will see J.J. Abrams hitting a film cameras Mickey mouse ears to give it that cool camera shake look. Also, take a look at this article in Creative COW magazine. A fantastic magazine that is free and worth reading page to page ever edition. http://magazine.creativecow.net/article/your-future-is-now

Stephen Smith
Utah Video Productions

Check out my Motion Training DVD

Check out my Motion Tutorials

I only survived viewing that because we Vulcans have a vestigial inner eyelid that guards against permanenet blindness.

[Carlton Rahmani] "So I read on another forum that the latest Star Trek movie was edited 2k. . .can anyone confirm or deny this? "

IMDB's tech specs for Star Trek says they used a 2K digital intermediate.

Like most major IMAX releases, they used a proprietary process called IMAX DMR for noise reduction and scaling for the IMAX print.

Walter Soyka
Principal & Designer at Keen Live
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
RenderBreak Blog - What I'm thinking when my workstation's thinking
Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

And don't worry about it. . .glad to 'provide' the opportunity to toss a couple of other things back and forth. And, yes, HISHE DOES rock!

Thanks for the info. I shoulda check IMDB, but figured I'd try and get a little more insight from the 'source'. Thanks for the stuff about IMAX though. Even if it's just a lead--i.e. something to google--it's still good to know about.

So there is an 8k. . .at least that is occasionally practiced. Thanks for filling me in. As for the press regarding production--and I don't know why shooting anamorphic would get so much buzz--I acknowledge that editing is perhaps the most overlooked, in terms of popular attention, aspect of production. . .definitely the least in terms of the major talent needed to execute a film, the other two being director and DP. Probably why it didn't even occur to me to check out IMDB.