| Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless
• | | | |
 | Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless
by Gilles Gagnon on Sep 12, 2012 at 8:29:15 pm |
Well,
I'm not impressed at all with titling in Vegas. Here's what I'm finding.
If I wish to create "fancy" titles I have 2 tools:
1. NewBlueFx titler - crashes ALL THE TIME! unusable.
2. Sony Pro titler - when I use this with other tracks, previewing is unusable... jumpy can't see what the video looks like as it would be viewed by the user.
So... I'm only left with the basic Sony Titles and Text.
This annoys me, tools that I pay for, that appear great... but can't be used.
Is it just me or are others experiencing this?
Gilles
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Joseph Tessier on Sep 12, 2012 at 11:37:25 pm |
Yes, Giles, I have the same issues with NewBlueFx titler. If I use it, I must render it (m2ts) and bring it back as a rendered file.
J. Paul
System Specs: I7 3.4 Ghz Quad Core 16GB Ram Win 7 Home Prem x64 VegasPro 11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Steve Rhoden on Sep 13, 2012 at 12:30:59 am |
Not you alone Gilles , As i mentioned in a previous post,
i simply do my titling using the basic titles and After Effects.
Too many options out there to be bogged down with one limitation.
Steve Rhoden
(Cow Leader)
Film Editor & Compositor.
Filmex Creative Media.
1-876-832-4956
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by John Rofrano on Sep 13, 2012 at 3:28:10 am |
Well... the NewBlue Titler is not from Sony so you can get help from NewBlue FX if it's not working for you.
The ProType Titler was a good idea executed poorly. We all got excited when we saw it but as you have experienced, it is not well integrated with the timeline as the other Sony tools and so it's usefulness is diminished greatly by this.
Having said that, I believe the new Titles & Text plug-in in Sony Vegas Pro 11.0 is awesome. It it way easier to use than the ProType Titler, it has a lot more animation presets built in than the ProType Titler, and you can directly manipulate the text on the Vegas preview window to place it exactly where you want it.
So when you say that you are " only left with the basic Sony Titles and Text" I don't agree because Sony Titles and Text in Vegas Pro 11.0 is a great title tool.
~jr
http://www.johnrofrano.com
http://www.vasst.com
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Steve Rhoden on Sep 13, 2012 at 4:30:45 am |
[Sony Titles and Text in Vegas Pro 11.0 is a great title tool.]
Still needs to be a whole lot better !
Steve Rhoden
(Cow Leader)
Film Editor & Compositor.
Filmex Creative Media.
1-876-832-4956
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Gilles Gagnon on Sep 13, 2012 at 11:16:53 am |
Thanks for your response everyone,
I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one with these issues.
As I have to use AE more frequently to add a pro quality to my titles/graphics I will look into switching to Adobe Premier. AE and Premier work very seamlessly together from my speaking with users. It wouldn't hurt to try it out. Seems to have a strong following too.
It's not the software that makes a great video. The software is a tool, but... the tool must be stable. If it integrates well with other tools, all the better.
Food for thought.
Gilles
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by John Rofrano on Sep 13, 2012 at 11:24:07 am |
[Gilles Gagnon] "As I have to use AE more frequently to add a pro quality to my titles/graphics I will look into switching to Adobe Premier." You might want to check out Boris Graffiti or Boris RED or even Boris Continuum Complete for titles. They all integrate seamlessly into Vegas Pro just like AE and Premiere. No need to switch.
~jr
http://www.johnrofrano.com
http://www.vasst.com
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Matt Carlson on Sep 13, 2012 at 10:24:02 pm |
Although once you learn an interface it seems less daunting I have to chime in here and say that knowing both Premiere and Vegas given the choice,even with crashes I will, use Vegas. Premiere still has some of the "old school" ways of having clips interact that seem more suitable to computers ten years ago (i.e. keeping everything separate as to not overwhelm... not necessary with 3+ ghz computers.)
There is also another interesting fact to consider: buy Vegas 12 instead of Premiere. This of, of course, is dependent on whether 12 is any more stable but the web page says Vegas 12 will be able to import After Effects files. How well all attributes are ingested remains to be seen but this will solve your workflow problems.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Gilles Gagnon on Sep 14, 2012 at 12:46:25 pm |
Hi Matt,
Thanks for piping in!
I'm curious. When you make references to Premiere using "old school" methods, are you talking CS6? A colleague of mime uses it... professionally and stated huge improvements in from previous versions.
Gilles
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Matt Carlson on Sep 14, 2012 at 7:21:53 pm |
The first of the old ways is that adobe products still do not allow for different video sizes on the same timeline . Add to this that the interface keeps transitions between clips several mouse clicks and dialog choices away unlike the simple Vegas default/drag and drop of transitions.
The Photoshop/After Effects/Premiere/Boris Red style of keeping the layers of effects in the cascade of "stripes" works well for After Effects because it keeps transformations organized. Since Premiere is not so much about adding or creating new visuals but actual editing the interface for me seems unnecessarily removed. I originally started using Vegas when it first came out as an audio engineer when it did not have video capabilities. It looked sort of similar to Pro Tools and Cakewalk but just the ease of response of dragging things around without dialogs popping up everywhere made simple edits so much easier. Premiere still, at least for me, has the design idea of lumping all the most used features like transitions and color in to the same parameter overload windows as the features that actually need them. It still feels like they want to keep the arcane feel of an old analog Avid bay because that is what the professionals are used to... the exact opposite of the design style that led me away from programs like Pro Tools a decade ago. Like you said, though, most of the obtrusive dialogs are gone (most since CS5) but the design directive still seems to be "if it is simple it is not pro" which is a load of rubbish.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by John Rofrano on Sep 13, 2012 at 11:27:42 am |
[Steve Rhoden] "Still needs to be a whole lot better !" It depends on what types of titles you are looking for. I usually keep titles either very simple in which Sony Titles and text is perfect, or I'm trying to make an impact in which case I use Boris RED/Graffiti or Boris Continuum Complete 3D Titles with text shatter and particle effects etc. But for "every day" titles, Sony Titles and Text is my "go to" titler.
~jr
http://www.johnrofrano.com
http://www.vasst.com
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Steve Rhoden on Sep 13, 2012 at 12:13:46 pm |
Gilles, No need to switch to Premiere Pro, i can tell you,
with Vegas and After Effects, you are in a perfect land, weather
seamless integration or not, After Effects can render to almost
any format already, that drops easily into Vegas. You can easily
do a complete edit from start to final output in After Effects.
Steve Rhoden
(Cow Leader)
Film Editor & Compositor.
Filmex Creative Media.
1-876-832-4956
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Gilles Gagnon on Sep 13, 2012 at 12:36:57 pm |
Thanks Steve,
My concern is in the workflow of the two together. I've used them together before but it was a real challenge when the client wanted to make a slight change in timing or in the actual effect/text generated in AE. Every time, I had to make the change an AE, render that (remembering the render settings previously used) and then re-render the vegas project.
So say I have a project and want to simply make a cut/segment shorter, and that segment has a layer of an AE generated text above which also needs to be re-synced, this becomes a very labourious/time-consuming process.
Perhaps I'm not using them together using the best method.
Another example: say you want to make an animated intro in AE which will be layered on top of your vegas project at the beginning. and say you vegas project start is looking great with cuts synced to the music, etc. How do you work in an AE overlay which will match the music? I can think of a few ways but none seem efficient, especially if the client may request a few seconds to be cut for instance. then all needs to be resynced, recreated.
What's the correct workflow?
Gilles
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Gilles Gagnon on Sep 19, 2012 at 1:14:50 pm |
Does anyone have any tips on the AE/Vegas workflow as described above?
Cheers,
Gilles
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Gilles Gagnon on Sep 13, 2012 at 2:27:27 pm |
Hi John,
Thought I'd give Sony titles and text another go. I tried the "coming at you" preset, as is, out of the box. Performance is pathetic. it jumps/stutters like mad and I can't really see the true result. This is at Preview-half resolution and with the track solo-ed.
Unless I'm doing something wrong...it's not really unusable.
Gilles
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by John Rofrano on Sep 14, 2012 at 12:02:55 am |
[Gilles Gagnon] "Thought I'd give Sony titles and text another go. I tried the "coming at you" preset, as is, out of the box. Performance is pathetic. it jumps/stutters like mad and I can't really see the true result. This is at Preview-half resolution and with the track solo-ed. " Some of the animations do stutter a bit but it's not too bad on my workstation. Because they're "canned" I usually don't worry about them because I know how they will look. You can always use Shift+B to perform a RAM preview and view them at full frame rates.
~jr
http://www.johnrofrano.com
http://www.vasst.com
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Gilles Gagnon on Sep 14, 2012 at 12:57:52 pm |
Thanks John, I'll certainly try the Ram preview.
Gilles
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Edward Troxel on Sep 13, 2012 at 2:45:42 pm |
Gilles & Joseph, if you're having issues with NewBlue Titler Pro, please start a help ticket at newbluefx.com. Some things to start with:
1. Make sure you have the most current version installed. Download from here and install only the OpenFX version:
http://www.newbluefx.com/downloads.html
2. Make sure you have the current video driver installed.
3. You can also try various things in Vegas: reduce the Ram Preview amount, change the preview setting to Preview (Auto), see what happens if you turn off GPU Acceleration (just to see if it makes a difference), etc...
Edward Troxel 
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Gilles Gagnon on Sep 13, 2012 at 6:12:00 pm |
Hi Ed,
Thanks for this. It was quite confusing acquiring the correct update file from NB. I think I got it though. I did the "update" from the help of the plug-in.
Same issue though. Too sluggish to be useful.
Cheers,
Gilles
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Edward Troxel on Sep 13, 2012 at 6:29:24 pm |
Change the Vegas preview to Preview (Auto). In Titler Pro, go to Settings and turn off "High Quality Preview".
Edward Troxel 
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Gilles Gagnon on Sep 13, 2012 at 6:36:40 pm |
Ed,
I'm using the Sony titles and text media generator, didn't find what you mentioned there.
I did set my preview to auto... no diff.
Gilles
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Steve Rhoden on Sep 13, 2012 at 9:09:18 pm |
Why does Newblue Titler has to be so touchy with
so many of its users?
Steve Rhoden
(Cow Leader)
Film Editor & Compositor.
Filmex Creative Media.
1-876-832-4956
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Edward Troxel on Sep 14, 2012 at 2:48:49 pm |
Honestly, I think it's touchy with a FEW of it's users and that the vast majority are using trouble-free.
Edward Troxel 
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Ken Mitchell on Sep 20, 2012 at 1:28:03 pm |
I think Newblue helped me out with the Titler to get it to work...so far.. They recommend that you reboot before you install Titler because if you have opened Vegas just once and shut it down there is still some part of Vegas running. When I followed their directions unistall the old version of titler,reboot then re-installed Titler Pro it seems to have fixed all of the issues.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Gilles Gagnon on Sep 26, 2012 at 10:41:14 am |
Thanks for this Ken.
I finally got around to doing this. We'll see what happens. It sounds like it did the trick for you. Hoping for the same results :)
Gilles
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Edward Troxel on Sep 14, 2012 at 2:50:59 pm |
Gilles, that option is in NewBlue Titler Pro - not Sony Titles & Text
Edward Troxel 
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Craig Meeks on Sep 16, 2012 at 5:09:42 pm |
Gilles, I had the same issue with my titler previews. No matter if I used Titler Pro, NewBlue, or whatever I couldnt preview it good enough to actually use it. I narrowed it down to my computer. I was running a weak AMD quad core so I decided to upgrade to the Intel 3960 six core and the results are incredible. All my previews are smooth.
Also, Sony's titler pro is great, but it just came out on svp11 for the first time. It will only get better.
Craig Meeks
Video Editor - South Coast Editing
http://www.southcoastediting.com
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Major flaws with "titling" in svp11 - almost useless by Gilles Gagnon on Sep 19, 2012 at 1:13:35 pm |
Thanks for the info Craig.
I'm using an i7 w 8gb RAM. I would assume this is powerful enough.
I'll keep my fingers crossed that v12 has improved in this area.
Gilles
| | | | |
| |
|