Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
SONY VEGAS: Sony Vegas TutorialsSony Vegas ForumArticlesBasics ForumBlack Magic Design ForumAJA Xena Forum

Sony Vegas Cannot Render to .flv?

Cow Forums : Sony Vegas

<< PREVIOUS THREAD   •   VIEW ALL THREADS   •   PRINT   •   NEXT THREAD >>
Sony Vegas Cannot Render to .flv?
by Ryan Jones on Oct 14, 2009 at 4:04:00 am

I am wondering if there is anyway to render a video to .flv from sony vegas. I feel like I must be missing something here.

Let me get this straight: Sony vegas cannot render a video to the most popular format for internet viewing?...

No, I do not want mp4 h624. Flv is more widespread and takes up less space and plays for the viewer instantly with no slow loading. Adobe premiere can do this; do they just own the rights to it so no other video software can do that?

I realize that I can convert the video afterwords to flv, but that is a whole other step and will take another couple of hours to render, not to mention lose a little quality due to another conversion. What a waste of time.

Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

Re: Sony Vegas Cannot Render to .flv?
by Adam Rose Esq. on Oct 14, 2009 at 10:30:25 am

you is right, sadly.



Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

Re: Sony Vegas Cannot Render to .flv?
by Dave Haynie on Oct 15, 2009 at 6:12:53 pm

Yes, that's true... Vegas doesn't render to flash video. Most NLEs don't, largely because flash video has been such a proprietary format. Adobe has it, but only after buying Macromedia (the originators of flash). You can get it as a Quicktime plug-in directly from On2 (the .FLV CODEC is based on On2's compression technology).

I rather expect there's some heinous licensing issues involved, or more companies would support it. After all, MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 adds cost, and I agree, flash is no less popular these days (though converters from "something else" really are a dime a dozen).

As for quality... it's a non-issue, really. Export to any reasonable format, and you're adding so much crazy compression to deliver an online video, you're not going to make things measurably worse going though an intermediate CODEC. If quality was that big of a concern, you'd go H.264 anyway.. or offer both. FLV takes up less space because you typically crunch it down more, and people accept this. But at the same quality, H.264 wins, easily.

I'm not talkin' out my butt here, either, I put up a few hours of FLV video every week.

-Dave

Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

<< PREVIOUS THREAD   •   VIEW ALL THREADS   •   PRINT   •   NEXT THREAD >>


FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINETRAININGVIDEOS - REELSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

© CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved.

[Top]