Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
APPLE COLOR:HomeApple Color TutorialsApple Color ForumApple ColorTraining

Color and RedCam

COW Forums : Apple Color

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
Share on Facebook
Jack TunnicliffeColor and RedCam
by on Apr 16, 2009 at 3:00:45 pm

We are posting a feature and creating a DI back to film at Technicolor from RedCam footage. Our plan is to output DPX files as the metadata flows through to the lab. They will do a lustre pass to take it from Rec 709 color space to film color space.

The film insurance company has stepped in this morning with some concerns. I hate to put this on a message board but I need to get some quick answers or defense as quickly as possible or we will lose the job. Here's what they are saying:

I mentioned we were doing our first feature on Color. A concern has come up from the producers and insurers. Is there anything I can say in our defense? See note below:

There are concerns, from the project's insurers and thus producers, about Java Post's ability to deliver the proper materials to the film lab. More to the point, a concern about Color.

Basically, somebody suggested that Apple's Color did not deal with the Red 2k QT wrapper properly and thus reduced color resolution would be apparent in the DPX files that we would be able to send to the lab.

Something about Color and FCP not being able to deal with the de-Bayering of Red 2k footage correctly and thus there are image components that will appear soft in certain colours...


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

Jack TunnicliffeRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 16, 2009 at 3:38:39 pm

I've never done this before. I'm going to respond to my own post as I just received an answer back from Graeme Nattress, the guy who wrote the code. I didn't actually think I'd hear back as quickly as I did so here's the answer. I knew there would be many of you interested in this information:

Hi Jack,

Well, I'm as qualified as anyone on how the RED / Color integration works.....

There are two modes of extraction of 2k from 4k used in Color. Both modes cut through Quicktime and access the R3D raw data direct.

2k Quick, is used for fast preview - it access the full 4k R3D data, but rapidly extracts 2k RGB from it. It's full RGB with equal resolution in all three channels. Only downside to this is you may, in some circumstances, see mild aliasing artifacts.

2k Nice is used for rendering (you can also render in 2K Quick by adjusting the render proxy settings) - Access the full 4K R3D and demosaics and downsamples to 2K in one go with a specially designed algorithm for absolutely superb sharpness and minimal aliasing. It's a very nice downsample from the full 4k and again, has full resolution in R, G, B.

In neither mode is their reduced colour resolution. No image components will come out soft.

As you know I wrote both the algorithms for getting 2k from 4k R3D, so I know exactly what I'm talking about.

Graeme



Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

Robert DueRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 16, 2009 at 3:43:27 pm

How does one go about working in "2K Quick" and "2K Nice"? Is this done in Color? Or are you using REDCine to do this?

Robert Due
Editor / Colorist
INDEPENDENT EDIT


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  


Ben ScottRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 16, 2009 at 5:00:53 pm

found a similar reply last week on reduser forum from graham

been working with red content over the past month for a post class we delivered at http://www.vet.co.uk

would be very interesting to find out at what point is the red primary room being applied e.g. I presume the latitude in the image is being set from the red room and so it is important to set this to a decent range for grading in secondary rooms

for the scaling we saw some fantastic results at 1.3 times bigger, no real artifacts, at 4 times bigger you noticed it but because of the jpeg2000 compression it scales much more organically

what we couldnt figure from these posts was how does the geometry room apply with red content, are we working from 4k files, scaled down through the geometry room to size needed and supported e.g. 2k or are we scaling off 2k files to 2k files and wouldnt this cause some softness when blown up for cinema projection?

also what wasnt clear was how is Color scaling the content is it a very high quality algorithm like shake or is there a better scaling workflow?


what also came up with lots of questions was compatibility between formats shot, color spaces, DCI output, video files were far easier to deal with once back in FCP e.g. how do you add titles to a dpx sequence.




- - - - - - - - -
Check my podcast at http://cowcast.creativecow.net/final_cut_pro/index.html
or my site at
http://www.benscottarts.co.uk/ - - - - - - - - -


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

Jack TunnicliffeRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 16, 2009 at 5:56:34 pm

We're using Technicolor for the film print. They are doing a Lustre pass to move the color space from Rec 709 to the color space for the film to be printed. Right now the producers are negotiating with Fuji and Kodak. Technicolor is asking for titles to be separate from the DPX reels. We're not sure how we are creating these files as yet.



Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

Oliver PetersRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 16, 2009 at 11:15:39 pm

Sounds to me like they are being unnecessarily concerned. Color is fine and can work with RED just fine. Either natively or not. It doesn't have to be 2K either, but could be good old 1920x1080. The best way would be to work out a short test out to film with Technicolor and make sure the workflow is solid.

To give you some ammunition, here's an example of an Oscar-nominated film that was graded in Color:

http://digitalfilms.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/encounters-at-the-end-of-the-w...

Originally shot with XDCAM-HD. I've seen it as a film release and it looked very, very good.

- Oliver

Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  


Jack TunnicliffeRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 16, 2009 at 11:18:14 pm

We are shooting a test and doing the whole trip out to film print next week as you suggest. Thanks for the link to the film. That helps as ammunition.



Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

Uli PlankRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 17, 2009 at 3:25:42 pm

We are a research institute of a very respected German university of arts and did extensive testing on RED footage. Plus, I'm teaching digital cinematography for Nordmedia, where professionals from all over Europe are trained for the new era of HDTV and digital cine (together with trainers like Michael Ballhaus, for example).

So, I hope I can add with some authority that the concerns they are expressing are a common misconception about FCS and Color. Color is capable of accessing the original RED footage independently of whatever reduced resolution you use in FCP for realtime editing. You can set it to decode the 4K footage at "Half High", which is the same setting most people would use with tools like REDAlert or REDCine from the company itself. This setting will give you perfect quality for some 98% of your shots if your delivery size is 2K. A full 4K decode (which indeed is impossible in Color as of today) will need extreme rendering power and is only necessary for very critical low-light shots. If you don't have any of these, you'll be fine with a tool as economical as Color.

If needed, you could always decode critical shots in full quality with the other tools mentioned, but that will complicate your workflow for DPX. I'd recommend additional tools like Gluetools in such a case to edit your final DPX sequence, since FCP can't cut them in natively.

Hope this helps,

Uli

Director of the Institute of Media Research (IMF) at Braunschweig University of Arts


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

Jack TunnicliffeRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 17, 2009 at 3:24:34 pm

Thank you very much for this additional information. As yesterday wore on we found out the insurance company had been hurt with RedCam movies in the past, so they are nervous. A feature shot here last year was expensive for them because there were backfocus issues with a certain firmware on Redcams. An update fixed it but only after several days of shooting had gone by.



Return to posts index
Reply   Like  


Uli PlankRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 17, 2009 at 10:00:09 pm

1. That's a completely different issue from grading in Color.

2. I've never heard of a backfocus issue caused by firmware. While there have been lots of problems before firmware 16, backfocus is a purely mechanical parameter. Since it has to be adjusted by hand (with the help of optical devices), it can't be caused by any firmware.

I'm afraid those folks don't have a clue about filmmaking, be it digital or analog…

Director of the Institute of Media Research (IMF) at Braunschweig University of Arts


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

Chad TerpstraRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 17, 2009 at 5:57:01 pm

I'd also like to know how to toggle the high and low quality raw interpretation.

Is there a way to fix Color's horrible use of the geometry room? In all my experience in Color if you change the shot the slightest amount in that room, the resolution is cut in half. Your only hope is to leave it alone entirely and resize shots elsewhere. If anyone knows contrary to this please let me know! Thanks!

Also the only other problem with the all-Final cut workflow is that footage recorded in 2K comes in at 1K resolutions. Correct me if I'm wrong.


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

Uli PlankRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 17, 2009 at 9:46:55 pm

Half Standard and Half High decoding can be set in a system extension after installing RED software on the Mac.

2K is decoded full quality by Color. Only 3K has problems.

Yes, the Geometry room used to have problems, but they should be fixed by now.

Director of the Institute of Media Research (IMF) at Braunschweig University of Arts


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  


Joseph OwensRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 18, 2009 at 1:23:10 am

>"Yes, the Geometry room used to have problems, but they should be fixed by now. "

"Should have" is correct, but not true.

jPo

This IS my blog!


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

Uli PlankRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 18, 2009 at 9:25:17 am

Well, I didn't touch it lately, but that's annoying anyway.

I do my reframing after coming back into FCP.

Director of the Institute of Media Research (IMF) at Braunschweig University of Arts


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

Jack TunnicliffeRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 20, 2009 at 9:52:50 pm

I've loaded up some test RedCam files that were shot on the weekend. I am looking at the 2K DPX files now and a bit confused about color space on the Red tab. The choices are Redspace, Camera RGB or Rec 709. I'm assuming that I would select Rec 709 but please tell me if this is not correct? I am working with an Ecinema grading monitor and an AJA Kona 3 card, so that is why I assume I should be working in Rec 709 color space.

Technicolor will do a Lustre pass from Rec 709 to film color space when we send them the final DPX files.

Any feedback is appreciated.





Return to posts index
Reply   Like  


Jack TunnicliffeRe: Color and RedCam
by on Apr 20, 2009 at 11:29:57 pm

More information on that last post. I just got in touch with the camera assistant. Apparently the camera was set up to the wrong color space to begin with and they changed it to Rec 709 after a partial day of shooting. The remainder of the DPX files created were in Rec 709 color space. This all comes through in the Red tab as part of the metadata for each file. Good to know I wasn't going crazy and there was a reason for all of this.



Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

Colin HubickRe: Color and RedCam
by on Jan 20, 2010 at 8:35:39 pm

A posting on reduser from Jim Jannard that conflicts with this posting.



"2. They shot 4K footage and did a half-res debayer to 1080P (half-res throws away 78% of the recorded information) and did not "un-sharp mask" the RAW footage because _________ (insert another myth here).
3. They shot RED 2K footage (1/4 of the resolution) and expected it to be the same resolution as 4K.
4. They watched a bad film print.

RED 4K-RAW footage has 256% more measured resolution than a 1080P camera (assuming it actually measured the captured resolution). RED 4K-RAW footage has more measured resolution than a 4K scan of S35 film. Resolution is not something that the RED ONE is deficient at. Shoot a zone plate and see for yourself.

Jim"


Link to Reduser

http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=40067&page=2


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
Share on Facebook


FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINESTOCKYARDVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]