Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US :: FAQ
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
ADOBE AFTER EFFECTS:HomeForumBasicsExpressionsTutorialsPodcastsAE TechniquesCreative Cloud DebateFAQ

After effects or Nuke?

COW Forums : Adobe After Effects

<< PREVIOUS   •   FAQ   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
Share on Facebook
Sala SultanAfter effects or Nuke?
by on May 13, 2011 at 5:16:56 pm

Hello! Hope u can help me with this one
Im working as a freelance doing visual effects and video editing.. And I'm using Adobe After effects for fx and FCP and Premier for video editing.. Syntheyes for 3D tracking, C4D for 3D
I cant make up my mind, Do I take courses in C4D and After effects or take a new courses in Nuke and C4D? Why some productions work on Nuke? What's the share market for Nuke vs After effects? 
Thanks!

Sala


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

Walter SoykaRe: After effects or Nuke?
by on May 13, 2011 at 5:51:27 pm

Nuke is the new Shake. Most compositing for broadcast and film happens in Nuke today. Nuke offers big benefits on capabilities, workflow, and pipeline integration.

After Effects owns the motion graphics market, and is frequently used for lower-end compositing.

As to where you should focus your studies -- I suppose that really depends on what you want to do and what the shops you freelance with are using.

Walter Soyka
Principal & Designer at Keen Live
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
RenderBreak Blog - What I'm thinking when my workstation's thinking
Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events


Return to posts index
Reply   Like  

<< PREVIOUS   •   VIEW ALL   •   PRINT   •   NEXT >>
Share on Facebook


FORUMSTUTORIALSFEATURESVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2014 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]