| Deciding on an HDV camera
• | | | |
 | Deciding on an HDV camera
by Nic Hubbard on Jun 20, 2006 at 5:01:32 pm |
I am interesting in getting an HDV camera, because I really want to start shooting in HD. I am coming from using the Panasonic DVX100, so I do have high expectations, but I don't have much money to spend. I have been looking at the Sony HDR-HC1 and it looks to be promising, and in my price range. But my quesiton is, are any companys coming out with consumer leven HDV cameras soon besides Sony? I did not attend NAB this year, so I did not see if Panasonic or anyone else were entering the consumer HDV market. If anyone has advice on a sub $2000 HDV camera, I would really appreciate it.
| | | | |
• • | | | |
I'd suggest snapping up a HC1 if you can still lay hands on one. It is VERY similar to the pro-version A1, but lacks XLR's and a few other useful but not indespensible software features like black stretch, etc. Of course, the FX1 is a far nicer camera to use but about $ 1500 more. As far as I know no other small HDV camera is in the offing unless Canon release a HDV version of their XM2 or JVC release a handheld version of the HD100. I've not heard anything along lines officially though. Derek Antonio Serra
Filmmaker
http://www.controversifilms.co.za
http://www.indv.co.za
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Thomas James on Jun 20, 2006 at 9:07:14 pm |
In the sub $2000 price range you have a few choices for HDV
1. The discontinued Sony HDR-HC1 or the Sony HVR-A1 starting at $1500
2. Sony HDR-HC3 starting at $1350
3. JVC GR-HD1 or the discontinued JVC JY-HD10 starting at $1700
4. Sanyo Xacti HD digital media camera which uses SD cards instead of tape starting at $750
Next year Panasonic will debut the AVCHD format while JVC will debut the HD Everio.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Barry Green on Jun 21, 2006 at 12:55:07 am |
>>so I did not see if Panasonic or anyone else were entering the consumer HDV market<<
Not the consumer HDV market, no. But there are other options. Sanyo makes a small MPEG-4 handheld camera called the HD1, which retails at about $800 IIRC. And Sony and Panasonic jointly announced a new high-def format called AVC-HD, which may lead to new products from both manufacturers perhaps as early as the end of this year.
If you want HDV, the HC1/HC3 is about it in that price bracket. But if you aren't stuck on the HDV format and instead are looking at consumer-priced high-def (regardless of format) there should be many more options available soon.
-----------------
Get the most from your DVX camera. The DVX Book and DVX DVD are now available on ebay and at Amazon (http://www.fiftv.com/db)
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Nic Hubbard on Jun 21, 2006 at 5:05:49 am |
So, it sounds like it might be a good idea to wait a little while before I purchase. Does anyone have any details or sites with info about the new AVC-HD that Panasonic and Sony are releasing? so will this completly take the place of HDV, and be a new format I assume. I am just hoping someday an affordable 3CCD HD camera will be availible...I would love to get one of the HVX's for the price I paid for my DVX....
| | | | |
• | | | |
AVC-HD will not replace HDV, but will be offered as a true "consumer" HD format shooting to mini-DVD. If you're looking for something of high quality with pro features then I doubt that is the direction to take, although we'll have to wait until actual camera's are released. I'd guess that for the next year or so the present HDV cameras will remain current. Derek Antonio Serra
Filmmaker
http://www.controversifilms.co.za
http://www.indv.co.za
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Barry Green on Jun 21, 2006 at 2:55:19 pm |
Whether it will replace HDV is a question that the marketplace will answer. It has been announced as a consumer format, but then again so was HDV, and so was DV. That didn't stop pro HDV cameras like the Z1/HD100/XLH1 or pro DV cameras like the DVX & DV5000 from being announced.
AVC-HD is a superior format in many ways (uncompressed audio in 5.1 channels or Dolby Digital AC-3 audio in 7.1 surround sound, full-raster recording, more efficient codec, and true 24p support in both 720 and 1080) and an equal in other ways (same 4:2:0 color sampling, etc). I cannot fathom why we wouldn't see equally pro cameras being developed around this format. On paper it even offers some advantages over XDCAM-HD as a recording format (better audio, no prefiltering to 1440, etc)(although obviously the camera head that it's attached to will make more of a difference than just the recording format!)
The main differentiator will be recording medium; HDV is based around recording on tape, and AVC-HD is a tapeless system. Sony is implementing it via recording on mini-DVD discs, Panasonic is implementing it via recording on SD memory cards (which keeps with their corporate philosophy on their bigger cameras, where Sony uses blu-ray optical discs and Panasonic uses solid-state P2 memory cards). So as long as people demand a tape-based system, HDV will continue; if people express a preference for tapeless, AVC-HD fits that bill.
The other main differentiator is that HDV product is on the market and available for purchase right now, whereas AVC-HD has only just been announced as a format and there's no definite time table as to when the first AVC-HD products will hit the market.
There's talk that the FX1 has been discontinued; I wouldn't be surprised at all if Sony replaced the FX1 with an AVC-HD-based FX2.
-----------------
Get the most from your DVX camera. The DVX Book and DVX DVD are now available on ebay and at Amazon (http://www.fiftv.com/db)
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Blast1 on Jun 21, 2006 at 8:06:25 am |
If your target is $2K and under you can get a A1U for $2400-$2500 and Sony has a $500 rebate on it good to Oct. 06
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Thomas James on Jun 21, 2006 at 4:00:34 pm |
For all practical purposes the JVC GR-HD1 and JY-HD10 HDV camera can be considered to have the equivalent color fidelity of a 3 CCD HDV camera under good lighting conditions. Even though it uses only one chip the JVC can sample 2.5 megapixels of color information which rivals the Sony 3CCD which can sample 3 megapixels of color information. Some experts even consider the color fidelity of the single chip JVC to be superior to the 3 chip Sony under good lighting conditions. Although the JVC is not as compact as the Sony HDR-HC3 nevertheless it represents an excellent value for film makers who desire a low cost progressive scan camcorder that can achieve the film look.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Nic Hubbard on Jun 22, 2006 at 1:11:40 am |
So, if I want to go with the Sony HC1 or the HC3, are either of those progressive in HD mode? Also, I have heard that the HC3 is not as good, as they removed some more disireable features, such as the focus ring. Any thoughts on these camera's, and which is better?
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Thomas James on Jun 22, 2006 at 5:38:30 am |
If you go with the Sony HC1 or HC3 it does have a progressive cineframe mode which averages 24 frames per secound but the vertical resolution is only 540 lines not the 1080 of the interlaced mode.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Ken Hodson on Jun 22, 2006 at 1:17:39 am |
The down side of the HD1/10 is its noise in low light levels and the need for filters for high light levels. I have constantly achieved a high level of image quality from the HD10 and still being the only low cost "progressive" solution have not been tempted by the interlaced solutions. That said it takes far more skill in shooting and in post than any other cam I have ever used, so I personally would be very hesitant to recommend it to a new shooter.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Thomas James on Jun 22, 2006 at 6:56:42 pm |
What is interesting is that Sanyo introduced a high definition camcorder that shoots native progressive 720p high definition, is half the cost of the Sony HDR-HC3 and is very compatible with the new flat panel 720p displays which are also natively progressive, and has an ultra-compact form factor. Yet most stores refuse to stock this product because the reviewers keep saying that 720p is not real high definition therefore the camera is a waste of money. Yet if you get a chance to download any Sanyo footage you will see that this camera is an amazing value for the $800 price point and not everyone can afford to spend $1500 for a Sony even though Sony is probably the better camera. With that said it certainly is not impossible to shoot at 30 frames per second if you carefully track the object you are shooting and even this is an improvement over digital still cameras which have movie modes of only 15 frames per second.
| | | | |
• | | | |
After re-reading your 1st post, as others have said yor only real options are the HC-1 or the HC-3.
If you are shooting the kids t-ball games, birthday parties, at home in an underlit living room... I'd chose the HC-3.
Yes the HC-1 has more manual controls, but for trips to Disneyland, do you really need a wireless lav? Are you going to be trying to use manual focus with the eyecup, or LCD - ie no monitor? ... not gonna happen, not worth the pain.
If you are shooting for broadcast... you may need to step up in price to one of the 3 chip cameras.
I think the HC-3 will be top of the consumer line till at LEAST X-mass of this year. maybe longer... it will be like the Sony TRV-900 - which had a super long run as great consumer MiniDV camera.
Thanks,
Harry.
Forum Cowmunity Leader: OSX
Forum Cowmunity Leader: Indie & Doc
Dual 1.8 G5 ** 1GB ** 10.4.1
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Ken Hodson on Jun 22, 2006 at 11:12:55 pm |
Consummers by and large have had no need for a progressive cam. JVC has not rushed to update the ground breaking HD1/10 series, as it is really the prosummer/pro who demands progressive. An interlaced cam allows very poor shooting skills to still be somewhat watchable due to the higher motion capture.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Thomas James on Jun 23, 2006 at 12:27:37 am |
Progressive HD cameras are the best choice for the flat panel displays which are natively progressive. Already low cost 720p60 MPEG-4 chips have been developed for consumer cameras. By next year I expect that JVC will have an Everio HD camcorder capable of shooting 720p60 and Panasonic will have a 720p60 AVCHD P-2 consumer camcorder. Sony will have a progressive AVCHD camcorder that can shoot 1080i60 and 1080p24 onto a Mini-DVD. For hybrid digital still media cameras 720p30 and will work just fine because most movie modes on digital still cameras max out at 30 frames per second anyways. Such digital still cameras will also be able to shoot 2 megapixel still pictures at 30 frames per second which later can be converted to video when the technology permits.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Ken Hodson on Jun 23, 2006 at 1:04:10 am |
When 60p become common place then consummers will use it. You have to understand that most consummers don't know how or care to learn how to shoot 24/30p. It ends up looking like a choppy mess. They like to walk around the back yard looking through the view finder making all of us sea sick. For non-locked-down shots the higher the motion capture the better. At this moment 60i would be it. When 60p is common in a consummer cam and everyone has progressive TV's (won't be long) then 720p60 will clearly be the format to have.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Nic Hubbard on Jun 23, 2006 at 3:20:59 pm |
Believe me, I am NOT going for crappy quality video, and I am not interested in interlaced. Saying that, I am not just an average consumer. I have a film degree, and have owned a few very nice professional cameras. But now, my line of work has changed, and I no longer have access to equipment costing tens of thousands of dollars. I still want the quality, and I know how to shoot progressive, and 24p/30p frame rates, the DVX100 was great training for that. Just wanted to point out that the start of this tread was not because I wanted to shoot crappy home videos, and I wanted the novilty of HD. It is because I was interested in a low cost solution to HD, and wanted to see the options and if it was even possible to get decent footage if you have the skills.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Thomas James on Jun 23, 2006 at 4:28:49 pm |
I think that the best way to compare cameras is to download some footage in high definition. Check out
http://www.hd-channel.com It is a german site but they have footage of both the Sony HDR-FX1 and the JVC JY-HD10
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Ken Hodson on Jun 23, 2006 at 9:30:55 pm |
My comments were not ment to be in referance to you Nic. I was just trying to illustrate a point to Thomas progressive isn't always the best solution, especially for the mass consummer.
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Dan Achatz on Jun 24, 2006 at 5:11:22 pm |
For the money you can't beat the HC1. I personally have an A1U, but I have used the HC1 for my second camera and the video is exactly the same. If you need the audio you can get the lowest price beechtek-4 and it works perfectly with the one exception of no phantom power.
Here are some sample clips form my HVR-A1U. These are show the good and the bad about the camera.
http://www.filmguideseattle.com/hvr-a1U_test_shots.wmv
| | | | |
• | | | |  | Re: Deciding on an HDV camera by Thomas James on Jun 24, 2006 at 5:38:15 pm |
So whats wrong with the Sanyo Xacti HD camcorder ? For the film look its 720p30 progressive scanning can't be beat and it is the low price leader with an MSRP of $800. It's 5 megapixel chip will rival even a 3CCD HD camcorder for color fidelity at least under good lighting conditions and the footage is absolutely amazing if you knlw how to shoot.
| | | | |
| |
|