|  | Re: Scenic question by Ed on Jun 13, 2006 at 10:20:01 pm |
There are so many sites, forums, and lists that have so many comparisons of the main HDV (and HVX200) contenders. Any of us
could probably give you our personal favorites. A couple of things though: Some cameras *only* do progressive in HDV (the JVC HD100),
the upcoming HD200 will do 60P as well as 24 and 30P. Some do native interlaced and fake progressive (the Canon and the SONY).
What's the final use? The Panasonic needs a long-term storage strategy because you'll be shooting to P2 cards or a Firestore, CitiDisk, or other drive
that you'll need to download from.
From what I've read so far, all the cameras are a lot closer than far apart in features and image. Sure someone will tell you that the HVX200
is better because of its DVCPro100 codec, or that the Canon seems to win the technical resolution contest, but when you look at the images
from all the cameras side-by-side, there isn't a lot of difference. My choice? The JVC, but mostly because it's a shoulder mount style that I'm used to.
I like the interchangeable lens too (the Canon has that as well).
Ed
| |