AUTODESK COMBUSTION:

Combustion v After Effects


	Cow Forums : Autodesk Combustion << PREVIOUS THREAD • VIEW ALL THREADS • PRINT • NEXT THREAD >>

Combustion v After Effects
by Rezzet on Feb 16, 2007 at 6:36:28 am

Hey guys. I used AE and recently downloaded combustion trial to take it for a spin.
What are advantages of Combustion over AE? What are disadvantages?

Thanks.

Respond to this post • Return to posts index

Re: Combustion v After Effects
by Janis Jansons on Feb 16, 2007 at 8:06:44 am

If you have come to a point when you start to compare it is not the software but your mind.
Because software will not do creative part of job.

But then again.. I wouldn't do roto paint in AE if you would beat me to it.

Janis

Respond to this post • Return to posts index

Re: Combustion v After Effects
by DavePotts on Feb 16, 2007 at 7:56:17 pm

Basically, the argument goes something like C* is an excellent compositing tool with decent text and motion graphics capabilities, and AE is an excellent text/motion graphics tool with decent compositing capabilities. I think the main issue for a lot of folks who are learning either package is the size of the user base and the opportunities to learn.

Dave Potts

UNC Charlotte Broadcast Communications

Respond to this post • Return to posts index


	<< PREVIOUS THREAD • VIEW ALL THREADS • PRINT • NEXT THREAD >>