Setting up a new system
by Jake Schumacher
on
Sep 29, 2009 at 12:56:35 am
Cheers,
Full discloser here; I am looking to utilize your collective wisdom and experience to save myself and those that come after me countless hours of frustration. I am looking for advice/product recommendations on putting together a video production system to capture a church service; to be streamed live to Ustream, broadcast on local tv and play on demand on the church website. I have looked the previous threads and have not found a similar thread, though it is possible and if so please point me in the right direction. I am wanting to a have 2-4 camera setup, connect to a mac pro located in an office approx 200 feet from the cameras. I was really hoping the Red Scarlet would be released but I am at a point that I need to move forward so I would love advice on everything from cameras, lenses, tripods, HDMI repeaters, computer hardware, production software, the whole gambit. My budget is $20,000-$25,000 (I hope this is high end enough, if not please be gentle) and I own the following items; Mac Pro with 10gig of ram, 1 terabyte of memory, an apple cinema display, and the apple creative suite of software. I have posted a similar post over on Web streaming forum but from what I've read on this forum, I'm pretty sure I am in the right place.
Thanks for taking time to read this short novel and even more for taking time to respond.
Jake
Re: Setting up a new system by Mads Nybo Jørgensen on Sep 29, 2009 at 5:47:56 am
Hey Jake,
In short you want a full on HD multi-camera studio with all the cabling and mixing and streaming hardware/software for $25,000?
Sorry mate, but you need a miracle (This is me being very gentle).
Either ask for more money or reduce your expectations.
Since you already have a powerful Mac I am assuming that you maybe also have a camera or two? It would be good to know what other equipment you have?
But you should consider starting with just 1 camera that can do the live streaming - something like a HDV camera should be fine (Canon, JVC, Panasonic, Sony Z or EX model). If you can afford it, buy two cameras and use the second for inserts after the service into the main programme.
Alternatively, ask for more money and buy a Newtek Tri-Caster with whatever cameras that you can afford to fit the budget.
Good Luck
All the Best
Mads
London, UK
Mac Million Ltd. - HD Production & Editing
Please watch our Showreel here: http://reels.creativecow.net/film/1145
Blog: http://macmillionltd.blogspot.com
Re: Setting up a new system by Jake Schumacher on Sep 29, 2009 at 6:16:39 pm
Mads,
First off, thank you for taking time to reply to a post that should be posted under a not yet existent HD low end/basics forum.
I do have a canon hv30 (which does not shoot 1080p) and a very nice fluid head tripod, also, I have what I believe to be all the audio equipment that I should need. The auditorium were the service takes place is very well lit which is a great plus. Other than that I need to go shopping.
Since this is my first system, maybe I could get advice on what the minimum components are needed to pull off a two camera set up and then shop them individually if none are recommended.
Thanks again for allowing me to lower the level of the conversation down a notch.
Jake
Re: Setting up a new system by Micah McDowell on Sep 29, 2009 at 9:18:52 pm
I think the Tricaster would be a good choice for you as well; it can broadcast directly to the web, playback and record video internally so no need for DVDs for in-service videos, so it is for the most part a studio in a box... connect cameras, preview monitors, a deck to output to, and you're done. I work at a church and that's our setup.
Currently, the Tricaster is SD only (HD version is due to be released before the end of the year, but it will be more money for sure). Are you sure you NEED HD right now? HD might be overkill for the web and with your budget, it'll be hard to do. You said you want to do a local TV broadcast. Is the station broadcasting in HD? If not, what are their delivery requirements? This is what you need to meet, so find out if they need Beta SP/MiniDV/DVCPro or whatever format, since you may need to factor a deck into your budget.
The RED Scarlet will doubtless be a great camera, and I'm looking forward to it too, but the REDs are geared toward film-style production and would be somewhere between awkward and useless for broadcast multicamera TV like what you need. To fit in your price range and have nice quality, you might want to consider shopping around for good used SD gear, since there's tons of it right now. Get a couple nice cameras (maybe some well worn JVC GY-DV500s or similar; that's what we use and they're often under a grand apiece on eBay and very reliable). If you can squeeze better cameras like Sony EX3s into your budget, then do it by all means, but I think you'll find it difficult. Then get a Tricaster, broadcast monitors, a deck if necessary, cables, good tripods with heavy duty, GOOD heads (we use Vintens), maybe an audio board to mix for TV, and you've got the beginnings of something.
You could use your very nice Mac and the Canon for other production needs; you can actually edit on a Tricaster but I would much prefer Final Cut Pro and After Effects for what I'm usually doing (editing and motion graphics).
Re: Setting up a new system by Mads Nybo Jørgensen on Sep 29, 2009 at 11:16:34 pm
Hey Jake,
The only thing that I can add to Micah's comments is that I believe that Tricaster will for a certain period, depending on which model you purchase, offer you a very competitive upgrade path to the HD version - which is due out Q4 this year.
Otherwise I would follow the advice of someone who is doing the same as you intend to do.
There are no right or wrong - it is all about budget and ambitions.
All the Best
Mads
London, UK
Mac Million Ltd. - HD Production & Editing
Please watch our Showreel here: http://reels.creativecow.net/film/1145
Blog: http://macmillionltd.blogspot.com
Re: Setting up a new system by Bob Zelin on Sep 29, 2009 at 11:15:17 pm
Mads is correct of course, you need a miracle. The very fact that you are wishing for a Red Scarlet shows your innocence in what this product is, and what it can do. This is not a video camera designed for multi camera production with a video switcher. It is a 3K video camera, whose signal must be transcoded (via software like Red Rushes, Red Alert, etc.) into a usable format for conventional video. Your desire to use this camera as part of a multi camera production system for a church service indicates your background in doing this.
Based on this, I can tell you that you are setting yourself up to be sold "a cat in a bag" by a devious salesperson who will just take your money, and run. The Tricaster is a LOW END SYSTEM, and even ones considered junk by professionals - are expensive (like the Panasonic AV-HS400). When you setup a production system, you will need tripods, legs, lights, an intercom system with headsets, as well as the production switcher, audio mixer, microphones, cabling, HD TV monitors, as well as HD recording devices (even if it's low end - anything from an HDV VTR to a FCP edit system that can record the signal directly to hard drive). Count up all of these pieces - all of these items add up to a LOT of money - and it's not just the money - it takes skill and knowlege on how to setup and operate all of this equipment, and then produce a finished show, that can be distributed to your congretation.
Look for professional help that you can trust. You won't get complete answers on a user forum like this.
Re: Setting up a new system by Jake Schumacher on Sep 30, 2009 at 1:58:02 am
Mads, Micah, and Bob,
Thank you for the sage advice and taking time to comment on my post. This is not my first time baptizing myself by fire into an intimidating field, I have learned not to be afraid to ask questions, even if I risk sounding as ignorant as I am. My only video experience is from making very low end short films. The reason I am attracted to the Red Scarlet, well it look at it, what filmmaker wouldn't want to get their hands on it and jump the necessary hurdles to use it. Also our church is more willing to expand the budget to acquire cutting edge technology that can have multiple uses, unlike an SD tricaster whose useful lifespan seems short. The idea of not having much depth of field control for my shots does not sit well. I've been thinking about the GH1 just to get a few dynamic shots during the broadcast but I might be showing of my ignorance again.
The channel that we are planning on broadcasting on has told us that they will be able to broadcast in HD no problem. The television broadcast is by far the priority over the live streaming.
I talked to two different guys today who produce television shows for their respected churches. One started with a very simple SD setup and 3 years later has a 50,000 HD pan and tilt set up running off a mac pro. The other is using 2 HD cameras with long runs of fire wire to a video onix switcher that records on a deck and then they capture and edit on a mac pro. Both are broadcasting in SD because of the channels they are working with. I say all this to say that I am asking a lot of question so I won't duped by any devious salesman.
What are your thoughts on running two 1080p consumer cameras (http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=177&modelid=17384)
or (http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Definition-Handycam-Camcorder-Recording/dp/B001M070UA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=photo&qid=1254254610&sr=1-1)
running via HDMI (?) with repeaters to a switcher and then to the mac pro with say a AJA Kona 3 card? Add a GH1 getting a few artistic shots to be spliced in since it can not at this time support "live" HDMI out. This seems like a low dollar set up made of components that should retain their value and have other uses, such as stunning stills with the gh1 and man on the street interviews with the camcorders?
Re: Setting up a new system by Bob Zelin on Sep 30, 2009 at 2:19:37 am
if you have a limited budget, and you must be HD, it is my suggestion that you abandon any hope of running a switcher, with a switched feed, and work with iso HD cameras, and a nice FCP edit system. All of this can be done for way under 25 grand. You will get wonderful quality, and produce the exact show that you expect.
If you get a camera like a Sony HVX-200, and a nice FCP edit system with an AJA Kona LHi card, and a nice big Panasonic Plasma display (and the assorted accessories, like a mixer, speakers, black generator, disk drive storage), you will be UNDER budget, and still have a wonderful camera, and a wonderful edit system, and still be able to produce professional quality shows in HD. You can't accomplish the world for 25 grand -nor should you try. Do with the budget that you have to work with, and as you succeed, and your shows become successful, you will get more budget allocated to you, and then you can expand your system - and eventually have the multiple GOOD QUALITY cameras and switchers that you need to do what you really want.
Re: Setting up a new system by Jake Schumacher on Sep 30, 2009 at 3:15:07 am
This is encouraging. I am assuming you meant the Panasonic hvx-200, is that correct? I already own Final Cut Pro, a large cinema display, and quality speakers. What would be your recommendations for a quality mixer and disk drive storage?
Re: Setting up a new system by Steve Wargo on Oct 1, 2009 at 6:46:41 am
[Jake Schumacher]"Please elaborate"
Hi Jake
It seems like you're trying to do everything with little money.
An HD switcher starts around $8k
Cameras can be cheap to pricey. you could mix cameras and have cheap ones for stationary shots and something with a real lens for your close-up/follow camera. you also have to record to something.
you need to find a local genius to help you and then come back with a real equipment list. The catch is that you'll need some long cable runs and that is tough to do with component so you should have HD-SDI and that costs money.
In other words, you could pull this off with some research, careful shopping and a bit of a compromise.
Good Luck
Steve
Steve Wargo
Tempe, Arizona
It's a dry heat!
Sony HDCAM F-900 & HDW-2000/1 deck
5 Final Cut (not quite PRO) systems
Sony HVR-M25 HDV deck
2-Sony EX-1 HD .
Ask me how to Market Yourself using Send Out Cards
Re: Setting up a new system by Jake Schumacher on Oct 1, 2009 at 5:54:45 pm
Thank you for the response and we are working on a price list of items that I will post shortly.
We saw on the Philip Bloom review of the jvc gy-hm100u that it uses a 720p processor that then upscales to 1080p, and we're wondering if this makes the camera a complete fraud as far a 1920x1080 camera or is there a useful reason they process the image this way?
Re: Setting up a new system by Micah McDowell on Oct 1, 2009 at 6:02:46 pm
It certainly doesn't make it a complete fraud... there's many cameras that work that way, and relatively few have been "true" 1080 until recently. Resolution isn't the biggest factor necessarily.
Re: Setting up a new system by Jedidiah Hurt on Oct 1, 2009 at 6:45:08 pm
I'm wondering where Philip Bloom got that info (not that I doubt him, he seems to know his stuff—I just can't find that anywhere). This page seems to specifically state that the camera has a 1080p processor under the heading Newly Designed 1080p Digital Processor. Is that copy just hiding the fact that the image sensors are only 720p and the DSP is upscaling it to 1080p?
Is there a way to tell by the size of the image sensor if a camera can capture unscaled 1080p? I.E. It's common knowledge that 1/4" CCD sensors aren't large enough to capture anything higher than 720p?
Re: Setting up a new system by Tim Kolb on Oct 2, 2009 at 12:19:17 pm
Unless you have money to start playing with the big boys, talk of "fraud" is probably going to keep you from making any move at all...
The Scarlett you started talking about will likely use a Bayer sensor like the RED One, which is structured to gather a half-res green image and a quarter res blue and a quarter res red image and combine them to create a full resolution image...
The HVX200 has a 960x540 sensor that is used to make a 1280x720 image that is reduced to 960x720 when it's recorded, or is ineterpreted all the way up to 1920x1080 and is reduced to 1280x1080 before recording.
HDV on the Canon or Sony end is really a 1440x1080 image played out as 1920x1080...and it's MPEG...but hey, it's HD for the same bitrate as DV.
HDV on the JVC is still MPEG, but it's used most often to record 720p material, and its sensor is 1280x720...maybe the least "fraudulent" of the bunch...and even if it does interpolate up to 1080p, it's much closer than the HVX is...
The bottom line is that you need to be realistic when you're looking at your options. Your total budget is about 1/3 to 1/4 the cost of a professional HD camera body (without a lense) like the F950 or the Panasonic 3700. Trying to avoid compromise won't get you anywhere. The only reason you can even have this conversation is that manufacturers have made some compromises and made technology very affordable.
However, don't waste much time looking for something that will "hold its value", in our business with our equipment, an automobile looks like a good long-term investment.
Technically, you can always find some way that a piece of equipment makes a compromise. 1080p uncompressed is great! ...but even with your nice Mac, I don't know if you've got the stuff to store or even playback 7.5 Gigabytes per minute of video. So...image compression is another compromise that makes the data manageable.
I like Bob's idea of going with separate cameras and editing the thing afterward. Switching cameras with HDMI or FireWire is a pain with long cable runs, not to mention that camera synchronization is impossible.
The TriCaster idea is OK if you're going straight to the web...otherwise it's completely incompatible with your Mac...it's a PC based system.
As others have said, this is a tall order on the budget you've stated.
Re: Setting up a new system by Jake Schumacher on Oct 10, 2009 at 9:37:28 pm
Tim,
Thank you for your response and technical insight. We have definitely lowered out expectations for this project. For us, live streaming HD is not worth the money. Not only is it the money but also the quality control aspect. By recording on three different cameras and editing them together we have much more control and can have a higher production value. With this in mind, we were attracted to cameras that are flashed based and shot in a format that could be edited in FCP with out transcoding. This would allow us to start editing in less than a half-hour after finishing filming. We took our proposal to the financial board with 3 JVC hm100's as the cameras, we did this in order to stay under 20,000. We chose these cameras mainly because of the the high reviews, flash memory and it's ability to shoot .mov natively. We also looked at the Panasonic hm40 which is even less expensive. The board encouraged us to look into higher end cameras and said they would allow us to expand the budget to make sure we got quality gear. The more we look at the Red Scarlet, the more I realize my complete ignorance of what this camera is going to be. It is not a viable nor versatile camera for what we are trying to accomplish. We are currently looking at the sony ex3 and the jvc hm700. Since you have a keen understanding of what is under the hood of many of these cameras, is there anything we are not seeing on the specs of the EX3? Do you know what processor this camera is using?
http://pro.sony.com/bbsc/ssr/cat-broadcastcameras/cat-xdcam/product-PMWEX3/
I wanted to thank all of you for your time and we will post the products we settle on and the links that led us to those decisions for those innocent people that come after us.
Re: Setting up a new system by Tim Kolb on Oct 19, 2009 at 3:57:22 pm
[Jake Schumacher]"is there anything we are not seeing on the specs of the EX3? Do you know what processor this camera is using?"
Processor?
It has 1/2" sensors...that's a nice feature in a camera this small. I'd guess (I haven't even researched it) that the JVC is considerably less expensive
Re: Setting up a new system by Brian scheffler on Nov 16, 2009 at 4:36:47 am
I'm not sure if you've already found a solution, but I think it is possible to get an HD system setup for $25,000 - $30,000. The new TriCaster XD300 HD video switcher will cost $14,995 and should be released yet this year.
You could then get a couple of decent prosumer HD cameras and still be within budget. We work with TriCasters all the time for various projects from small webcasts to full-blown TV broadcasts.
To read that some people thing the TriCaster is "junk" is strange because it is used in so many environments by beginners and professionals. The demos for the XD300 look impressive... and as one member pointed out, TriCaster purchases made before November 26th quality for a full credit if you decide to purchase the XD300 when it becomes available before the end of this year.
We have helped many organizations design and build systems based on the TriCaster... reply if you have any questions.
Re: Setting up a new system by Gary Hazen on Sep 30, 2009 at 12:42:28 pm
"I am looking for advice/product recommendations on putting together a video production system to capture a church service; to be streamed live to Ustream, broadcast on local tv and play on demand on the church website._ - JS
So, you want to do live television production.
"The reason I am attracted to the Red Scarlet, well it look at it, what filmmaker wouldn't want to get their hands on it and jump the necessary hurdles to use it...." - JS
Re: Setting up a new system by Micah McDowell on Sep 30, 2009 at 2:35:47 pm
Those motorized pan/tilt systems are a neat idea, but you'd need to try them out first. I was at a church a couple weeks ago that had three Sonys on Fujinon automated pan/tilt heads. They worked great most of the time, but if the speaker started moving quickly on stage they couldn't always keep up smoothly. I can't imagine that those little Panasonics are the greatest quality for $8K either.
Jake, it looks like you need to balance some of your needs with your budget...
If you NEED HD and NEED live streaming ability, it's probably not going to happen on your budget.
If you NEED the streaming but can live on SD, just get the Tricaster setup, it'll do fine.
If you NEED HD but can live with editing the show together after the fact (so nothing truly "live"), I'd go with something like what Bob Zelin suggested earlier. Get some Panny HVX200s or Sony EX3s as the budget allows, iso record to cameras, and put together a nice edit system with the Mac you already have. The finished show will look better than the other options and you'll be within budget.
Before you blow any money though, you should find some professionals in your area to help you put this all together... you can't learn everything from a free web forum, even if it is the COW.