Apple Pro Res.

	Re: Apple Pro Res. by gary adcock on Aug 26, 2008 at 6:37:28 pm [Marc Poirier] " the tech specs are 1080i @ 59.94." this would be interlaced at 29.97 frames or 59.94 fields [Marc Poirier] "the output will still be interlace if I use a HDCam SR? " Yes it will be interlaced no matter what tape format. gary adcock Studio37 HD & Film Consultation Post and Production Workflows Inside look at the IoHD Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

	Re: Apple Pro Res. by gary adcock on Aug 27, 2008 at 1:08:43 pm [Marc Poirier] "so what is the difference then in setting my timeline in 29.94fps vs 59.94fps if they are the same? " Marc. One is FIELDS per second and one is FRAMES per second. 29.97 frames for = 59.94 fields for interlaced material One has to be careful with the frames vs fields issues. In the 1080 world all of the content plays back as interlace or as "progressive segmented frames" so the 29.97 vs 59.94 is carryover from the SD world. In HD we have a myriad of frame rates to deal with so most have adopted as standard the 59.94 timing for most HD Prosumer and consumer formats, but not for Sony's HD camera which still call 60i as 29.97 this was complicated ( simplified) by Panasonic and JVC's decision in supporting the 720 HD spec which are set at a 59.94 FRAMEs per second timebase instead of the 59.94 FIELDS of 1080 broadcast. gary adcock Studio37 HD & Film Consultation Post and Production Workflows Inside look at the IoHD Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index

	Re: Apple Pro Res. by gary adcock on Aug 27, 2008 at 2:11:02 pm [Marc Poirier] "OK.. so if some animations where made in 30frames per second and brought in a 59.94 fields per second timeline, there shouldn't be any problem.. " Correct - that would be the normal workflow for graphics and animation for video. gary adcock Studio37 HD & Film Consultation Post and Production Workflows Inside look at the IoHD Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index