question on live streaming from a bar
by Oswald Biddleson
on
Aug 30, 2006 at 3:16:57 pm
I've tried to glean the answer from other posts with no avail. I have a client who wants to install a live video camera in a bar to broadcast onto their website.
Now, I understand the process: camera--->computer with encoder--->connected to internet via broadband--->media server--->posted on client's website ready for viewing.
My question(s): what IS the best format? Windows Media Encoder seems the common choice, BUT I keep reading online about Quicktime Streaming, live streaming on flash(see link: http://www.on2.com/developer/live-flash8-sdk/) which both sound much better quality. What am I missing? Is it a cost factor? I understand the Windows Media Encoder is free...is there some licensing fee with the others? Last question: am I missing some hidden astronomical fee if a ton of people tune into the barcam?
Sorry for the verbosity, but I've hadd too much coffee. Thanks, Cows.
Re: question on live streaming from a bar by mike velte on Aug 30, 2006 at 7:56:34 pm
Now, I understand the process: camera--->computer with encoder--->connected to internet via broadband--->media server--->posted on client's website ready for viewing.
I am not experienced with much of this but did stay at a Days Inn last year.
Stick with Windows Media Encoder for best compatibility. A encoder card (PCI) like an Ospey
(www.viewcast.com) in conjuction with Windows Media Encoder will give better quality and real time push to the server. The card is about $200 and there are no fees to MS for the software.
The $$$ come in at the video server which will charge by the kilobyte. Many More clients are dissapointed with the lack of viewers than huge fees from too many.
One additional question to Mike by Oswald Biddleson on Aug 30, 2006 at 10:15:36 pm
First, thanks for your quick response. One last question: most webcams I've seen with Window Media players look pretty mediocre. and i keep hearing all the hype on flash for webcams.
Any insight? Thank you, sir.
Re: One additional question to Mike by mike velte on Aug 31, 2006 at 11:26:26 am
The better the camera, the better the results. A $50 web cam would be a waste. The camera could be your weakest link. A Sony VX 2100 or PD 170 would work nice in low light.
