| | | | Re: Cure for yellow blotches in AVCHD video?
by Angelo Lorenzo on Mar 22, 2013 at 4:57:07 pm
in the Adobe Premiere Pro Forum
If you really don't like it, I suggest grabbing Neat Video http://www.neatvideo.com/
The older RED ONE camera, for as high end as it is, suffers from blue/yellow low frequency noise (splotching) and I achieved excellent results cleaning up entire | | | | |
| | | | Re: Top 5 budget video cards to use with Sony Vegas?
by Michael Toffan on Mar 22, 2013 at 12:04:56 am
in the Sony Vegas Forum
With all the negative discussions regarding GPU rendering with Sony Vegas Pro, I wanted to add my own personal positive experience with GPU rendering.
I am using SONY VEGAS PRO 12 and I am having good success using my ASUS NIVIDIA GTX 680 GPU duri | | | | |
| | | | Re: Final Cut Export/Youtube
by Kurt Bergeron on Feb 23, 2013 at 1:16:38 am
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
interesting,......alright,....yeah it has been h.264. I know I dont have the BEST equipment but I do the best I can with what I have so the loss of quality on youtube already bugs the crap out of me. The more compressed the image is,...the better it | | | | |
| | | | Re: Final Cut Export/Youtube
by Kurt Bergeron on Feb 23, 2013 at 1:01:37 am
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
All of my source material is gone. I can't keep files on my computer. I need a new system so friggin' badly, I just can't afford it right now. I'm one of those guys who works around the clock for people who pay little to nothing, no matter how many t | | | | |
| | | | Re: VHS to FCP
by Neil Patience on Feb 15, 2013 at 1:45:58 am
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
If your captured footage matches the VHS then there is not much you can do to improve it in capture. As Shane says a model with a TBC might smooth out some of the "lumps and bumps" but you are not really going to get that much better.
What you mig | | | | |
| | | | Steps to correct exposure?
by Kirk Lauterbach on Feb 12, 2013 at 12:53:23 am
in the DSLR Video Forum
What steps do you take when setting the exposure for a shot.
I have always kept the iso as low as possible, then I adjust the the aperture. I read once to keep the shutter speed around 1/120 if you are shooting at 60 fps. I usually shoot at about 30 | | | | |
| | | | Re: Darken Highlights
by Brian Tallant on Feb 10, 2013 at 4:03:08 am
in the Sony Vegas Forum
Steve,
Thanks so much! It worked great! Recently you mentioned I should try the Neat Video plug in and that worked great too...both of your suggestions have made my work a lot easier (and better)! | | | | |
| | | | Re: Noise and the ultimate export
by JD Marlow on Feb 6, 2013 at 11:23:19 pm
in the AVID Forum
Just to piggy back on this thread -- I am a recent convert from FCP to Avid and one of the things I'm really missing is my Neat Video plugin. Does anyone have a good workflow for cutting and finishing in Media Composer, but sending consolidated medi | | | | |
| | | | Re: Green Screen Optimization
by Angelo Lorenzo on Feb 2, 2013 at 10:41:34 pm
in the Adobe After Effects Forum
Denoise your footage is you can (I reply heavily on Neat Video for this kind of work) as that will get rid of some of the judder/noise/
Mostly, though you could probably mask around your foreground actor. A semi-tight mask would do the trick and t | | | | |
| | | | Re: Noise and the ultimate export
by Neil Patience on Jan 30, 2013 at 9:35:16 pm
in the AVID Forum
I know it sort of mad replying to a post with first something that doesn't work but Neat Video is indeed a really excellent de-noise app but as Glenn says no Avid version.
They support just about every other NLE there is so maybe email them and sug | | | | |
| | | | Re: Noise and the ultimate export
by Glenn Sakatch on Jan 29, 2013 at 8:55:23 pm
in the AVID Forum
I always recommend neat video for de-noise. I don't think it works natively in avid, I have an after effecs version and a motion/fcp version. There is an ofx version, but I've had trouble getting it to work.
As far as cleaner images, it all st | | | | |
| | | | FCP X Image stabilisation
by Carlo Ferraro on Jan 26, 2013 at 9:34:49 pm
in the Apple FCPX Techniques Forum
I've tried the Lock&load plug in from Coremelt compared tp the Stabilisation in FCP X and really it is better if the movement is a small one. I tried especially on those zoom back shots when it is very windy and the still close up of the beginning is | | | | |
| | | | Re: Transistions in After Effects
by Walter Soyka on Jan 18, 2013 at 2:13:26 am
in the Adobe After Effects Forum
Neat Video is available for Premiere Pro, so it may not be necessary to bounce every shot to Ae for noise reduction.
If you can describe your Ae workflow in a little more detail, we may be able to offer some other advice. | | | | |
| | | | Transistions in After Effects
by Vinod Pan on Jan 17, 2013 at 2:23:18 am
in the Adobe After Effects Forum
Hello,
I have a question regarding transitions in Premier Pro and After Effects.
I edit and add transtions in PPRO and then bring the entire sequence to After effcts for adding some effects/noise reduction(Neat Video).
When I import PPRO sequen | | | | |
| | | | Re: AE Render locked up
by Angelo Lorenzo on Dec 29, 2012 at 10:17:09 pm
in the Adobe After Effects Forum
Well multi-process rendering does take a little while to start up regardless. It's doing some house keeping and starting up all the new processes and so on. On my system it's always far less than a minute of lag though, maybe 20-30 seconds. If it's f | | | | |
| | | | How was this done????
by Kyle Cox on Dec 21, 2012 at 7:53:15 pm
in the Adobe After Effects Techniques Forum
Video in question is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ZbxXbuWa3Jw
It's a pretty neat video with some cool effects, but my main focus is at the :05 second mark. Here we see the current UFC light heavyweight champion, Jon | | | | |
| | | | Re: Fastest way to do "motion masking"
by Tero Ahlfors on Dec 21, 2012 at 5:26:34 am
in the Adobe After Effects basics Forum
[Trung Nguyen] "Also, I have a Neat Video's Reduce Noise effect applied to the footage layer. In which order would the results be better: Reduce Noise first then Roto Brush, or the opposite?"
You're getting into a world of hurt here. These are bot | | | | |
| | | | Re: C300 = Fail
by Robbie Carman on Dec 20, 2012 at 10:21:27 pm
in the DaVinci Resolve Forum
[Juan Salvo] "Reminds me of the awfulness of the af100. :("
100%. Its just not a great image to push and pull like the AF100. Shot very well it holds up but when you need to get in there and really stretch things is not so good. Its funny I ha | | | | |
| | | | Re: why no ram preview in PP cs 6.03?
by Angelo Lorenzo on Dec 14, 2012 at 8:46:48 am
in the Adobe Premiere Pro Forum
Do you have one of the newer versions of neat video? Open the effect, go to preferences and you can benchmark it. It should take advantage of nVidia CUDA processing, otherwise it's a very heavy effect... but not nearly enough as to have a 20:1 encodi | | | | |
| | | | why no ram preview in PP cs 6.03?
by Dylan Mann on Dec 14, 2012 at 8:11:58 am
in the Adobe Premiere Pro Forum
As above. I'm relatively new to PP, so pardon me if I forgot some settings and stuff.
I searched over the net, and it seems that Ram preview is only available in AE, is that true?
i asked this because i'm having some odd problems here :
vi | | | | |
| | | | Re: BCC Noise Reduction
by Matt Carlson on Dec 11, 2012 at 6:52:37 pm
in the Sony Vegas Forum
Yes Steve is not engaging in hyperbole. Neat Video is x@#*}^# Amazing. BCC Noise reduction ends up blurring the pixels much more than Neat Video does. The only advantage that BCC has is the built in pixel chooser that most of the BCC plugins have | | | | |
| | | | Re: Weird Artefacting
by Tudor "Ted" Jelescu on Dec 9, 2012 at 8:53:06 am
in the Adobe After Effects Forum
A few things to try:
32 bit color space
use Neat Video or AE's own remove grain to smooth out the initial footage
add noise to the final shot | | | | |
| | | | Re: Noise reduction Tecnique for FCP x
by willy pimentel on Nov 30, 2012 at 4:48:04 am
in the Apple FCPX Techniques Forum
Excelent, but i Believe that neat video Doea not support aplyimg filters to events. I was wondering if it worked from compressor but couldn't find a way
I will try tonight directly to events
Thanks for the feedback
Sent from my iPhone 5 | | | | |
| | | | Re: Neat Video not rendering in Vegas 10
by Rob Siegfried on Nov 19, 2012 at 2:40:36 am
in the Sony Vegas Forum
Nick,
Appreciate the quick response. I don't use my GPU (GTX570) to render in Sony Vegas as my benchmark testing showed it didn't have much of an effect on render times. So i had it turned off already. Although I believe it's enabled in Neat Vi | | | | |
| | | | Re: Neat Video not rendering in Vegas 10
by Nick Gardner on Nov 18, 2012 at 2:50:32 am
in the Sony Vegas Forum
Yes I believe it worked after I turned off GPU rendering or something like that. In the Vegas settings. If you're still having trouble I can look at it again to verify what I did. | | | | |
| | | | Re: Neat Video not rendering in Vegas 10
by Rob Siegfried on Nov 18, 2012 at 1:26:18 am
in the Sony Vegas Forum
Nick,
Did you ever find a solution to this?
I am having the same issues only I am evaluating the demo version of Neat Video. I am applying it to SD video less than 30 minutes. Just like you, I can see the improvements to the video in the prev | | | | |
| | | | Re: Graphics card for AE 5.5
by Walter Soyka on Nov 16, 2012 at 2:45:10 pm
in the Adobe After Effects Forum
[James McCavana] "Would even a mid-range Nvidea card work better than a 'performace' Radeon card, simply because of the core architecture?"
If you upgrade to CS6, you should also upgrade to an NVIDIA card. Ae CS6 uses CUDA (an NVIDIA-specific GPU | | | | |
| | | | Re: underexposed video
by Matt Carlson on Nov 14, 2012 at 11:51:58 pm
in the Sony Vegas Forum
This can be a tricky question and the answer, as with any complex problem, is it depends. Neat Video can reduce noise that the human eye does not detect at low levels so it is not truly necessary to identify the noise with the naked eye. Ultimately | | | | |
| | | | Re: underexposed video
by Graham Bernard on Nov 14, 2012 at 7:14:26 pm
in the Sony Vegas Forum
If you don't do Levels first, how will you know how much you can de-grain in Neat Video?
I use Levels in conjunction with the Scopes.
Grazie | | | | |
| | | | underexposed video
by pete baratta on Nov 14, 2012 at 7:03:45 pm
in the Sony Vegas Forum
Just a quick question people...I have some "video by candlelight" footage with video noise in background.
I'll be using "levels" and the Neat Video plugin to clean it up...in which order should I apply the
effects...levels first or Neat Video nois | | | | |
|
|
