| | | | Re: Blu-Ray on normal DVDs
by brian paterson on Apr 30, 2012 at 12:25:43 am
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
Thank you for Juan your reply. Do you know if the quality is as good as that of a blu-ray disc made with a dedicated burner. I normally only make DVDs using iDVD. I output a disc image which I use in conjunction with toast to burn the disc. Can I do | | | | |
| | | | Re: Blu-Ray on normal DVDs
by brian paterson on Apr 29, 2012 at 5:31:46 pm
in the Adobe Premiere Pro Forum
Thanks Ron, according to articles I have read you can get up to an hour but can retain best quality up tp 40 minutes. Is this not correct.? Do I have to output from FCP as a blu-ray file or will toast convert it from my normal file. ( Normally I ou | | | | |
| | | | Re: SHOULD I attempt HD Editing and MORE...
by John Rofrano on Apr 28, 2012 at 6:15:10 pm
in the Sony Vegas Forum
[Matt Schwartz] "No dropouts, no glitches, no jigglies, no jaggies, even when scrubbing, just incredibly smooth, REAL NICE! "Wow that's great to know. I didn't think a Core i3 would be up to the task. | | | | |
| | | | boris red 4.3 - how to force progressive render
by alius sato on Apr 28, 2012 at 5:51:58 pm
in the Boris FX Forum
25i project with film source media, on avid mc5. the footage is in reality progressive.
but all the boris red renders, even from a surely progressive still image source file, have interlace jaggies on the edges. and if i field step through the fie | | | | |
| | | | Re: SHOULD I attempt HD Editing and MORE...
by Matt Schwartz on Apr 28, 2012 at 4:03:23 am
in the Sony Vegas Forum
FYI to all, with my little budget setup I imported AVC clips coming from an AF-100, some several minutes long put one formatted 1920x1080x12 progressive scan on the timeline and my setup handled it with NO PROBLEM. No dropouts, no glitches, no jiggl | | | | |
| | | | After Effects Rendering
by Ally Nicoll on Apr 9, 2012 at 1:06:37 am
in the Adobe After Effects Forum
Hello all,
I have checked the FAQ/Stickies but don't see such a stupid question as I'm about to ask... are you ready for this? Hang onto your keyframes...
I'm making a 5 minute short movie. Shooting at 1080p and 60fps - which allows me to do a | | | | |
| | | | Re: Still aliasing at 16x16???
by Brian Jones on Mar 28, 2012 at 10:31:48 pm
in the Cinema 4D Forum
the closer linear elements get to vertical the harder antialiasing gets since it has so few pixels over which to smooth the jaggies particularly with horizontal lines as the background. But there are a lot the settings can do, check out the help - t | | | | |
| | | | Degraded picture mess
by jay williams on Mar 14, 2012 at 6:40:50 am
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
Hi, I'm in need of a quick fix here.
I have a project where the Gamma has gone dark (both in the canvas and on export), and there's been a noticeable quality loss to the image that wasn't previously there.
When exporting as a self contained QT | | | | |
| | | | Re: DeckLink up-sampling vs. monitor up-sampling?
by Chris Blair on Mar 6, 2012 at 11:17:45 pm
in the Blackmagic Design Forum
Hey Kelly!
We've run into the exact same problem and the only real solution we've found is to have an SD monitor in the suite along with the HD monitor. We have a broadcast Sony HD monitor in our HD suite and it automatically switches if we feed i | | | | |
| | | | Re: Workflow for Deinterlacing for Vimeo
by jon smitherton on Mar 6, 2012 at 4:00:54 am
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
Thanks Michael.
I suppose I could put the Text on V4 say (would I have to do this for graphics as well?), then nest video in a interlaced video sequence, de-interlace and change the original sequence to a de-interlaced one.
Only thing is that I | | | | |
| | | | Re: Wiggly lines?....
by Mark Morache on Feb 15, 2012 at 4:03:10 am
in the Apple FCPX Techniques Forum
Hmmmm... Standard def. Gotta love it.
I'm wondering. Do you see the jaggies when you're editing? What about the output?
And when you're editing, what is the size of the viewer window? Are you viewing clips at 100%?
Is your project the same fo | | | | |
| | | | Bedeviled by Deinterlace
by Tom Donnelly on Feb 14, 2012 at 2:23:32 pm
in the Adobe After Effects Forum
I've not come across this scenario before, rendered many tests and cannot get a satisfactory result...
Footage originated from FCP, XDCam 1080i. Was slo-moed a bit in FCP, then outputted self contained from FCP to AE. Interpreted upper field fir | | | | |
| | | | Re: Weird Jaggies on Rendered Transitions
by J.D. Vaillancourt on Feb 4, 2012 at 1:38:50 am
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
Everything is working and all good on my end, so I'm happy.
Does your 7D footage say UPPER under field dominance? Probably not, now that I've solved the issue I've realized it only happens with certain codecs rendered from After Effects that FCP | | | | |
| | | | Re: Weird Jaggies on Rendered Transitions
by Bret Williams on Feb 3, 2012 at 10:04:45 pm
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
So what are your sequence settings? I'm currently editing in a 720p project with lots of 1080p DSLR (7D) footage transcoded to ProRes. FCP defaults to interpreting this footage as 1080i and it makes no difference. All my transitions look just fine | | | | |
| | | | Re: Weird Jaggies on Rendered Transitions
by Justin Vaillancourt on Feb 3, 2012 at 8:04:06 pm
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
Update, thanks to Matt, he made me realize I can change the field order of a clip in-sequence... and by turning the visibility on and off, FCP refreshes and sees the proper field order, fixing the aliasing. | | | | |
| | | | Re: Weird Jaggies on Rendered Transitions
by Justin Vaillancourt on Feb 3, 2012 at 7:39:11 pm
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
That's what I thought, but apparently it does matter for rendering. If the field order is not set to NONE it renders aliased transitions.
Once the footage is placed in the sequence with the wrong field order it will always render the transitions | | | | |
| | | | Re: Weird Jaggies on Rendered Transitions
by Bret Williams on Feb 3, 2012 at 7:27:14 pm
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
So were you seeing that during playback or paused? If you're working in progressive and FCP interprets something as interlaced, it really shouldn't make any difference, since in a progressive sequence interlacing interpretation is ignored. | | | | |
| | | | Re: Weird Jaggies on Rendered Transitions
by Justin Vaillancourt on Feb 3, 2012 at 7:02:58 pm
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
At last! After 2 hours of testing I have found the problem. It seems that Final Cut interprets certain codecs rendered from After Effects (Animation, ProRes) to have a field order even though they don't. It was as simple as scrolling over to the f | | | | |
| | | | Weird Jaggies on Rendered Transitions
by Justin Vaillancourt on Feb 3, 2012 at 3:34:02 pm
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
Hi, I'm not sure why this is happening, I have pre rendered ProRes LT files from After Effects, dropped into a properly formatted timeline. All my render settings are on best and my field order is none. The video exports crystal clear EXCEPT during | | | | |
| | | | HD to SD DVD
by Chip Hess on Jan 25, 2012 at 5:03:32 pm
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
I shot a project using the client's Pana AVCHD camera, 1080 60i. However, they want it delivered SD on DVD's. Shooting SD was not an option.
My timeline is set to 720 and am Logging and Transferring using ProRes 422 LT. Would you cut it this wa | | | | |
| | | | Re: The very best interlace to progressive conversion
by Brendan Dillon on Dec 19, 2011 at 12:40:26 pm
in the AVID Forum
If you're after the best convert it through a Teranex.
"PixelMoton De-interlacing of video originated material produces perfect progressive frames in preparation for further processing. The processing aperture is adjusted on a pixel-by-pixel basis | | | | |
| | | | Color loss during compression
by Nolan Maloney on Dec 12, 2011 at 6:18:11 pm
in the Compression techniques Forum
Hey all, first time poster, long time reader.
Got a compression question that I thought you might be able to help me out with.
My friend shot a promo video for an upcoming concert and wanted me to help her smooth out some jaggies in her text. | | | | |
| | | | Re: Apple HDV uncommonly used codec?
by Thomas O'Carroll on Nov 14, 2011 at 9:53:34 pm
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
[Shane Ross] "It isn't? You mean Sorenson Squeeze, on your computer, won't compress this format?
"
No, I mean Sorenson Squeeze on any mac (not just mine) will have problems encoding from AppleHDV to h.264.
It is easy to demonstrate and has no | | | | |
| | | | Re: EPS files in motion
by Jeff Jordan on Oct 21, 2011 at 3:38:07 pm
in the Apple Motion Forum
Matth is right. Even vector PDFs will get jaggies when scaling while that pesky "fixed resolution" is checked. It seems to be checked by default. | | | | |
| | | | Re: Unable to Play a QT File on New Macs
by Thomas Hughes on Oct 20, 2011 at 7:31:34 pm
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
We tried redoing it with the bitrate at 6000. The setting we had it on before was Automatic, so this time we did it at 6000. A few things about the resulting video: The former file, done at the Automatic setting, was 3.5Gb. This new file, done at | | | | |
| | | | Re: Problem with shadows (pic)
by Roland R. Kahlenberg on Oct 14, 2011 at 1:43:26 am
in the Adobe After Effects Forum
[Darby Edelen] "So try Roland's suggestion of moving them a little farther apart. You probably won't have to move them too much."
Yup, move them apart in Z-position coupled with a Scale change to keep size as per the original.
[Darby Edelen] " | | | | |
| | | | Re: Problem with shadows (pic)
by Darby Edelen on Oct 13, 2011 at 7:03:06 pm
in the Adobe After Effects Forum
This tends to happen when layers are too close together. So try Roland's suggestion of moving them a little farther apart. You probably won't have to move them too much.
Also you can increase the size of your Shadow Map, which generally helps to | | | | |
| | | | Re: ProRes antialiasing issue
by ben g unguren on Sep 30, 2011 at 6:09:06 am
in the Adobe After Effects Forum
When you have such strong, contrasty, saturated colors running into each other, you should expect the jaggies that you're seeing with ANY 4:2:2 codec (or 4:1:1, or 4:2:0, etc). That's because of the 2's in ProRes422. While the luminance values are a | | | | |
| | | | Sony HVR-S270U For Sale
by Ricardo Finley on Sep 9, 2011 at 3:33:00 am
in the Classifieds, Retailers Forum
For sale
Sony HVR-S270U ($7499 New) My Price $6500!
Ricardo@finleypro.com
Matte box and batteries not included.
The Sony HVR-S270U is an HDV camcorder designed for ENG applications, while still being highly cost-effective. Incorporating all | | | | |
| | | | Re: Green Clips inside Bin
by Gerry Condez on Aug 10, 2011 at 7:46:55 pm
in the Media 100 Forum
Hi Jon
I am sure you're right about the missing component issue. Most likely its part of FCP somewhere which I wont know. The video now is playing and far better in M100 than what I see when I playback in FCP which somehow I can see some faint ja | | | | |
| | | | Re: Playback problem with DVCProHD 720/30pN footage
by Alli Gallixsee on Jul 26, 2011 at 3:04:02 pm
in the Adobe Premiere Pro Forum
Hi Gregg et all,
I recently upgraded to PP CS5 at work and have started having the same issue with my P2 24PN footage- they all look exactly like your first youtube clip with lines and jaggies. I am not sure exactly what else to try- I am working | | | | |
| | | | Jaggies around key
by Matt Dragovits on Jul 20, 2011 at 1:55:50 am
in the Sorenson Squeeze Forum
Hello,
When I export my movie out of Premiere Pro the key looks fine. As soon as I import it into Squeeze I see jaggies all around the edges. This is before I even apply a compression setting. After I apply an flv setting and compress the movie l | | | | |
| | | | Re: Trying to get alpha on export using ProRes
by Matt Dragovits on Jul 20, 2011 at 1:25:08 am
in the Adobe Premiere Pro Forum
Ok, I've now read that Premiere doesn't have the same ProRes Codec as FCP for alpha support. I've tried using the animation codec, png, and none as part of quicktime at 32 bit. I do get an alpha exported but now it has jaggies all around the speaker. | | | | |
| | | | Re: Project Burned to DVD: Jagged Lines?
by Chris Tompkins on Jul 10, 2011 at 8:34:57 pm
in the Apple Final Cut Pro Forum
Well ya, the data rate does have something to do with it. I was going to mention the data rate.
You can up it some. But like you said, you got to fit a 2 hour program on the disc.
Burn another 5 min. test with the data rate upped some.
Goi | | | | |
| | | | Re: Animated Stills Look Horrid
by Mick Haensler on Jul 5, 2011 at 7:46:05 pm
in the Apple Motion Forum
Ah, a clue. I just tried animating one of the pics but only reduced scale to 88% and it cleaned up. Previously it was at 18%. So I kept it at 88% scale and just moved it back in Z space and the jaggies returned. Puzzling. | | | | |
| | | | C4D Rendering + AA
by Seth Baron on Jun 29, 2011 at 7:16:19 pm
in the Cinema 4D Forum
Hi,
New to the forum, thank you for providing this wonderful service!
I'm new to C4D (very new), so hopefully my question is a simple one to answer:
I'm trying to render a project without all the "jaggies". I've gone into the settings and | | | | |
| | | | Re: Green Screen/Chroma Key
by Matt Dragovits on Jun 28, 2011 at 6:00:17 pm
in the Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate Forum
The key I had shot is excellent. I was still getting jaggies in FCP Studio though. When I brought the same footage into Premiere it keyed out perfectly.
I'm glad to hear the keyer has been upgraded in X. That may be a big enough reason on its own | | | | |
| | | | Re: Premiere Pro to Color Workflow
by Clayton Burkhart on Jun 25, 2011 at 7:53:22 am
in the Apple Color Forum
I have tried the xml route directly to Apple Color in both directions. Using an xml directly from PP results in an empty timeline. In FCP it is necessary to create a new project around the xml created in PP. If I then use this project in FCP the im | | | | |
| | | | Re: hpx 370
by Chris Tompkins on Jun 24, 2011 at 5:26:03 pm
in the Panasonic HVX - HPX (P2) Forum
There are SO MANY things to love about this camera. It does make a beautiful picture.
24p and 30p are unusable if you are panning - in my opinion. Bad stuttering.
I was panning a room with many monitors just yesterday in 1080i_60i mode. And | | | | |
| | | | Re: Cinestyle grading issue t2i
by Dylan Hargreaves on Jun 21, 2011 at 11:04:20 am
in the DSLR Video Forum
We may be getting our moires mixed up. The type of moire that cinestyle produced on my quick test was the green and red noise in the midtone shadows rather than jaggies or that weird strobing effect you get when pointing the camera at a brick wall.
| | | | |
|
|
