SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
TRAINING
VIDEOS - REELS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
Final Cut Forum
Final Cut Tutorials
Final Cut Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
Cow Forums
:
Apple Final Cut Pro
FAQ
•
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by
arc nevada
on Feb 5, 2008 at 6:27:56 pm
walter biscardi,
You are saying it is OK for Ben Holmes to call me a troll? I would like proof of this. What thread have I high jacked? I am sorry if I don't find Ben Holmes to a be a video guru like many of you in these forums. I think Ben was the first one to make personal attacks on this thread. I don't care who he is. He should read things a little better rather than make assumptions. I thought calling him Boo Boo was a nice way to show him that he made a few mistakes or assumptions when reading my post. Whos fault is that? Walter are you trying to tell me Ben Holmes is a saint? I think Ben got his feathers ruffled because he knows it is not wise to shot in progressive mode if the station requires interlaced. Rather than accept the obvious he opted to but heads with me. Is that wise?
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Paulo Jan on Feb 2, 2008 at 8:07:18 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Ben Holmes on Feb 2, 2008 at 9:12:37 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Shane Ross on Feb 2, 2008 at 9:18:53 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Paulo Jan on Feb 2, 2008 at 9:42:22 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by arc nevada on Feb 2, 2008 at 9:55:00 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Ben Holmes on Feb 2, 2008 at 10:02:55 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Paulo Jan on Feb 2, 2008 at 10:11:01 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Ben Holmes on Feb 2, 2008 at 10:18:28 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by arc nevada on Feb 2, 2008 at 10:33:09 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by arc nevada on Feb 2, 2008 at 10:22:27 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Ben Holmes on Feb 2, 2008 at 11:40:30 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Bret Williams on Feb 3, 2008 at 6:41:06 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Larry Asbell on Feb 3, 2008 at 12:10:06 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Shane Ross on Feb 3, 2008 at 12:13:13 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by gary adcock on Feb 3, 2008 at 1:03:42 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by arc nevada on Feb 3, 2008 at 1:10:25 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 3, 2008 at 5:30:46 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Matthew Skeris on Feb 2, 2008 at 10:43:31 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by arc nevada on Feb 3, 2008 at 12:22:19 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Jack Joyce on Feb 3, 2008 at 1:03:01 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 3, 2008 at 5:22:54 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Mark Raudonis on Feb 3, 2008 at 7:05:41 am
Re: Re-interlacing: Yes, it can be done ! Albeit slow
by Uli Plank on Feb 3, 2008 at 8:44:40 am
Re: Re-interlacing: Yes, it can be done ! Albeit slow
by Jack Joyce on Feb 3, 2008 at 11:28:13 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by walter biscardi on Feb 3, 2008 at 1:25:30 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Paulo Jan on Feb 3, 2008 at 3:41:04 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Larry Asbell on Feb 3, 2008 at 5:33:11 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Paulo Jan on Feb 3, 2008 at 6:48:47 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 3, 2008 at 6:15:48 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Paulo Jan on Feb 3, 2008 at 6:37:47 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Shane Ross on Feb 3, 2008 at 4:40:37 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by arc nevada on Feb 3, 2008 at 5:43:51 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Ben Holmes on Feb 4, 2008 at 2:18:38 am
like "a car with three wheels"?
by Arnie Schlissel on Feb 3, 2008 at 5:53:42 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Arnie Schlissel on Feb 3, 2008 at 6:30:58 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Ben Holmes on Feb 3, 2008 at 7:32:38 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Graeme Nattress on Feb 4, 2008 at 12:39:52 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Kris Anderson on Feb 4, 2008 at 4:45:50 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Kris Anderson on Feb 4, 2008 at 4:53:38 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by walter biscardi on Feb 4, 2008 at 5:07:18 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Shane Ross on Feb 4, 2008 at 5:14:50 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by walter biscardi on Feb 4, 2008 at 5:20:53 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Uli Plank on Feb 4, 2008 at 2:27:03 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by walter biscardi on Feb 4, 2008 at 5:17:25 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by arc nevada on Feb 5, 2008 at 12:27:22 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Ben Holmes on Feb 5, 2008 at 1:29:34 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by arc nevada on Feb 5, 2008 at 2:29:27 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 5, 2008 at 2:55:31 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Ben Holmes on Feb 5, 2008 at 9:41:44 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 5, 2008 at 2:45:29 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by walter biscardi on Feb 5, 2008 at 1:24:21 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by arc nevada on Feb 5, 2008 at 6:27:56 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by walter biscardi on Feb 4, 2008 at 5:10:08 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Michael G on Feb 4, 2008 at 7:41:54 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Graeme Nattress on Feb 4, 2008 at 1:24:20 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by walter biscardi on Feb 4, 2008 at 2:16:46 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Graeme Nattress on Feb 4, 2008 at 2:23:10 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Uli Plank on Feb 4, 2008 at 2:30:39 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Jeremy Garchow on Feb 4, 2008 at 3:22:05 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Aaron Neitz on Feb 4, 2008 at 7:11:04 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Paulo Jan on Feb 4, 2008 at 8:42:10 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Aaron Neitz on Feb 4, 2008 at 9:23:06 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Kris Anderson on Feb 5, 2008 at 2:23:09 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Dave LaRonde on Feb 4, 2008 at 8:56:33 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by walter biscardi on Feb 4, 2008 at 11:02:09 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Dave LaRonde on Feb 4, 2008 at 11:10:53 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Kris Anderson on Feb 5, 2008 at 2:10:14 am
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Dave LaRonde on Feb 5, 2008 at 6:01:17 pm
Re: Re-interlacing footage at the broadcasters request: normal or not?
by Tracy Smith on Feb 15, 2008 at 4:23:53 pm
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
TRAINING
•
VIDEOS - REELS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]