SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
COW Forums
:
Apple Final Cut Pro
FAQ
•
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by
Jeremy Garchow
on Oct 5, 2010 at 2:03:10 pm
Yeah, but the context of that is vague. Smoke, it seems, has a steep learning curve. I doubt you can sit down and edit super fast with no training or experience on the interface. If you're used to FCP then Smoke represents a bit of a learning environment.
The video tracks with layers inside them is really sweet, though. I'd really like to get a Smoke on the Mac
demo sometime.
And Walter, your point about cost is s good one, but I'd be willing to pay more for more robust features. After buying FCP and all the plug ins I need to make it work for all I need to do (Including After Effects as my main 'plug in') the cost would even out over time vs productivity in mostly one application.
The idea that was mentioned to make FCP Express more of what FCP is now and then have a more fully featured FCS is intriguing. That would keep the cost of entry down for those that don't need the better finishing tools.
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Morten Ranmar on Oct 3, 2010 at 10:29:37 am
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by walter biscardi on Oct 3, 2010 at 10:38:20 am
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Morten Ranmar on Oct 3, 2010 at 11:30:21 am
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by walter biscardi on Oct 3, 2010 at 12:12:19 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Tom Wolsky on Oct 3, 2010 at 12:13:09 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Morten Ranmar on Oct 3, 2010 at 12:31:53 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Tom Wolsky on Oct 3, 2010 at 12:54:14 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Rafael Amador on Oct 3, 2010 at 12:46:47 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by David Johnson on Oct 3, 2010 at 1:27:07 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Bret Williams on Oct 3, 2010 at 2:52:15 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 4, 2010 at 3:48:20 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Andy Mees on Oct 4, 2010 at 4:07:43 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Bret Williams on Oct 5, 2010 at 4:38:54 am
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Zane Barker on Oct 3, 2010 at 8:04:24 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by David Johnson on Oct 4, 2010 at 1:52:36 am
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Zane Barker on Oct 4, 2010 at 1:56:43 am
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by walter biscardi on Oct 3, 2010 at 9:29:31 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Scott Sheriff on Oct 3, 2010 at 6:31:37 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Neil Hurwitz on Oct 4, 2010 at 12:26:37 am
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Rafael Amador on Oct 4, 2010 at 5:56:14 am
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by walter biscardi on Oct 4, 2010 at 12:56:04 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Neil Hurwitz on Oct 5, 2010 at 3:11:02 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Rafael Amador on Oct 5, 2010 at 3:32:08 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by walter biscardi on Oct 5, 2010 at 3:51:26 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Rafael Amador on Oct 5, 2010 at 4:08:55 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Walter Soyka on Oct 4, 2010 at 2:14:00 am
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Michael Aranyshev on Oct 4, 2010 at 8:51:26 am
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by walter biscardi on Oct 4, 2010 at 12:52:03 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Michael Aranyshev on Oct 4, 2010 at 1:08:15 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by walter biscardi on Oct 4, 2010 at 2:09:52 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Paul Dickin on Oct 4, 2010 at 9:01:06 am
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Martin Curtis on Oct 4, 2010 at 11:17:09 am
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by adam taylor on Oct 4, 2010 at 12:23:21 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by John Perez on Oct 4, 2010 at 2:31:58 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by walter biscardi on Oct 4, 2010 at 6:39:57 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Craig RussillRoy on Oct 4, 2010 at 5:54:30 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Tom Wolsky on Oct 4, 2010 at 6:07:24 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Craig RussillRoy on Oct 4, 2010 at 6:14:22 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Rafael Amador on Oct 5, 2010 at 1:44:23 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 5, 2010 at 2:03:10 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by adam taylor on Oct 5, 2010 at 2:15:26 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 5, 2010 at 3:57:10 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by adam taylor on Oct 5, 2010 at 4:00:36 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by walter biscardi on Oct 5, 2010 at 3:48:38 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Jeremy Garchow on Oct 5, 2010 at 4:19:45 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by walter biscardi on Oct 5, 2010 at 4:43:18 pm
Re: Who would like a unified interface for FCS?
by Walter Soyka on Oct 5, 2010 at 2:25:25 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]