SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
TRAINING
VIDEOS - REELS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
Final Cut Forum
Final Cut Tutorials
Final Cut Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Is 1280 1248...?
Cow Forums
:
Apple Final Cut Pro
FAQ
•
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Is 1280 1248...?
by
William Carr
on Nov 5, 2009 at 8:25:59 pm
Researched but not confident I understand it all. My two questions are about size and quality, and come to think of it, what two questions in this forum aren't? Well, there's also speed. Anyway:
Finished project master is DVCPRO HD 720 23.98.
Film fest in Europe asked for a 1280x720 H.264 which they will project (somehow, from something).
My task now: convert and send them a file.
With a same-settings QT exported from the master timeline, tried three Compressor outputs as below, viewed in QT player (likely how fest will play out to projector).
1) Apple TV gave me format/actual size of 1280x720, with fair-looking quality of 5.1 Mbit/s
2) QT H.264 with all settings to Best, etc. at current size=960x270 gave me great quality at 19 Mbit/s. But the size is "not" 1280x720.
3) QT H.264 with all settings to Best, etc. but with handy Frame Size drop-down of 1280x720. Gave me great quality at 22.5Mbit/s, yet rendered out format= 1280x720 and actual size=1248x702.
SIZE: I know there is a comfy relationship between a QT movie's dimensions and how QT Player can display it... but what should I do to deliver the actual size they spec'd at a better quality than Apple TV, which has a bitrate max of 5Mbit/s on the slider?
QUALITY: I cannot confirm the fest's projection/Mac/PC system specs until the Producer gets there days before-- so I figured on sending ahead three quality levels with request to use the highest, about 22Mbit/s. That make sense?
If you got this far, thanks for reading through it all!
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
Is 1280 1248...?
by William Carr on Nov 5, 2009 at 8:25:59 pm
Re: Is 1280 1248...?
by Aaron Neitz on Nov 5, 2009 at 9:52:31 pm
Re: Is 1280 1248...?
by William Carr on Nov 5, 2009 at 10:24:32 pm
Re: Is 1280 1248...?
by Tom Brooks on Nov 5, 2009 at 10:42:37 pm
Re: Is 1280 1248...?
by William Carr on Nov 5, 2009 at 11:15:49 pm
Re: Is 1280 1248...?
by Aaron Neitz on Nov 5, 2009 at 11:39:00 pm
Re: Is 1280 1248...?
by William Carr on Nov 6, 2009 at 12:01:44 am
Re: Is 1280 1248...?
by Aaron Neitz on Nov 6, 2009 at 12:57:18 am
Re: Is 1280 1248...?
by William Carr on Nov 6, 2009 at 1:26:32 am
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
TRAINING
•
VIDEOS - REELS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]