SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
TRAINING
VIDEOS - REELS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
Final Cut Forum
Final Cut Tutorials
Final Cut Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
Cow Forums
:
Apple Final Cut Pro
FAQ
•
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by
Michael Gissing
on Jul 4, 2009 at 6:19:40 am
A few matters of confusion. Shift fields is happening because NTSC HD is upper and NTSC SD is lower. Nothing to do with centre cut versus letterbox.
Most broadcasters prefer 16:9 anamorphic (often called Full Height) This is automatically centre cut on analog broadcast and correctly displayed on digital transmission with a suitable 16:9 monitor. It is also correct for DVD.
Deinterlacing has nothing to do with downconversion. It is a look and should be thought about carefully. FCP's deinterlacing is poor and throws away resolution. Third party plugins like Nattress are better and let you control blend parameters shot by shot. Compressors deinterlace is also better than FCP but is global and not shot specific. Given the look of the program was meant to be 'home vid' I would not deinterlace.
By far the best downconversion is to use an external hardware device like Teranex, Kona cards or even the built in downconvert in the Sony HDCam decks. They all look better to me than Compressor and the worst is letting FCP render down. The shift fields issue is only happening when you drop the sequence into an SD FCP timeline. All the hardware options fix this automatically on the fly in real time.
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by John Collucci on Jul 3, 2009 at 8:13:22 pm
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by John Fishback on Jul 3, 2009 at 10:32:03 pm
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by John Collucci on Jul 3, 2009 at 11:34:48 pm
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by John Fishback on Jul 4, 2009 at 12:55:42 am
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by Michael Gissing on Jul 4, 2009 at 6:19:40 am
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by John Collucci on Jul 6, 2009 at 2:35:50 pm
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by walter biscardi on Jul 4, 2009 at 6:55:04 pm
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by Steve oakley on Jul 5, 2009 at 9:02:41 pm
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by John Fishback on Jul 5, 2009 at 10:31:11 pm
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by Dan APPEL on Jul 14, 2009 at 12:26:56 am
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by Joe Procopio on Jul 31, 2009 at 4:50:03 pm
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by Jesse Coane on Jul 31, 2009 at 4:58:22 pm
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by Jesse Coane on Jul 31, 2009 at 5:09:15 pm
Re: HD to SD downconvert - Best Results Inquiry
by Ron James on Oct 21, 2009 at 5:25:45 am
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
TRAINING
•
VIDEOS - REELS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]