SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
TRAINING
VIDEOS - REELS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
Final Cut Forum
Final Cut Tutorials
Final Cut Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
Cow Forums
:
Apple Final Cut Pro
FAQ
•
VIEW POSTS
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
SEARCH
•
CHANGE FORUM
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by
gary adcock
on Aug 20, 2008 at 5:40:24 pm
Stealing my thunder again eh jeremy???
herb,
I did some extensive testing on this, not finding enough difference to proclaim one better than the other from a visual point of view.
on the other hand- the software converted camera native files to ProRes (NOT HQ) consistently played better on the 5 systems I tested them on. It seems that when you are doing a software conversion to PRHQ files the playback needed to have a higher performance CPU to maintain the playback without dropping frames.
Couple of things to remember- camera captures are 8bit - ProRes is 10bit.
ProRes HQ is forcing the data to completely fill out the entire 10bit space that is 4X as levels of gray as 8bit. (256 vs 1024 levels) where as the "plain" version of ProRes allows the 8bit camera file to just float inside the 10bit color space - only adding the extra information to the video file when it is needed, rather than forcing all of those 768 additional levels of gray to be occupied all the time like the PRHQ version does.
Make Sense?
gary adcock
Studio37
HD & Film Consultation
Post and Production Workflows
Inside look at the IoHD
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Current Message Thread:
ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by Herb Sevush on Aug 20, 2008 at 3:16:09 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 20, 2008 at 4:09:10 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by gary adcock on Aug 20, 2008 at 5:40:24 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by Sean ONeil on Aug 20, 2008 at 6:36:18 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by gary adcock on Aug 20, 2008 at 8:32:02 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by Herb Sevush on Aug 20, 2008 at 6:49:11 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by Sean ONeil on Aug 20, 2008 at 7:29:16 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by gary adcock on Aug 20, 2008 at 8:22:40 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by Herb Sevush on Aug 20, 2008 at 8:47:17 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by Mike Johnson on Feb 24, 2009 at 3:41:42 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by gary adcock on Feb 24, 2009 at 4:52:13 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by Jeremy Garchow on Aug 20, 2008 at 6:59:49 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by Chris Poisson on Aug 20, 2008 at 7:16:20 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by Chris Campbell on Aug 20, 2008 at 8:29:19 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by Chris Borjis on Aug 20, 2008 at 11:12:49 pm
Re: ProRes vs ProRes HQ
by Rod Main on Aug 21, 2008 at 8:27:57 pm
Related Threads:
Should colour correction need re-render on ProresLT timeline
|
HDV or prores?
|
Adding Prores HQ clips to DVCPRO-HD sequence
|
AVC Intra (ProRes or Native)
|
El Cheapo Shared Storage for ProRes (LT)
|
XDCam HD to ProRes 422 transcoding failed.
|
Non-HQ ProRes codec Easy Setup not available?
|
FCP ProRes Workflow
|
Problem with going from 5d Canon to ProRes
|
5DII files to Prores...
Note:
If you are a registered user please
click here to login
before posting.
Your post will not be accepted if your name and email address are not registered in our database. Click
here
if you do not have an account.
Name
E-Mail Address
Subject
E-Mail me when someone responds
Just This Message
Entire Thread
None
Message:
Note:
The following are HTML characters and may cause parts of your post to disappear if not used correctly: < > &
To include any portion of the post in your response, highlight the desired text and hit the "Q" key.
Read more...
Add your message signature
Note:
By clicking "Post Direct" button above, you are agreeing to the Creative Cow's
Code of Conduct
.
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
TRAINING
•
VIDEOS - REELS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
©
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved.
[
Top
]