SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE LIVETYPE:
Home
LiveType Forum
Final Cut
Final Cut Tutorials
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
COW Forums
:
Apple LiveType
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by
Sjon Ueckert
on Jul 18, 2008 at 7:28:24 pm
Well, this monster has raised it's ugly head again. I am not sure what you mean by changing alpha type to black. LT uses the animation codec which uses a 256 shade gray scale to produce its alpha channel. I have posted a copy of Mark's project up a few posts) and his screenshot is ragged whereas mine (with no changes) is quite elegant.
I have a difficulty in working through this problem because I can't duplicate it. I just finished two features and used LT in titling both of them. Both were NTSC HD projects and have played on theater screens, as well as on the IFC channel. and the titles were pristine. I make sure that HD projects are set to upper and SD projects are set to lower and I make sure that my render is set to normal and not draft. (These are all in the project settings).
If you are trying to do a crawl or roll, I strongly recommend that you use Boris FX in FCP and LT does not handle this well.
You might consider doing the title wrk in Motion if you can't get the results you want in LT.
Sjon
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by mark palmos on Feb 7, 2008 at 12:45:49 pm
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by mark in Chapel Hill on Feb 8, 2008 at 1:58:59 am
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by Mark Palmos on Feb 9, 2008 at 6:48:27 am
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by Sjon Ueckert on Feb 9, 2008 at 8:37:41 am
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by mark in Chapel Hill on Feb 10, 2008 at 2:40:13 pm
one more thing
by mark in Chapel Hill on Feb 11, 2008 at 3:29:38 am
Re: one more thing
by Sjon Ueckert on Feb 11, 2008 at 8:16:30 am
Re: one more thing
by mark palmos on Feb 11, 2008 at 10:47:38 am
Re: one more thing
by mark in Chapel Hill on Feb 11, 2008 at 6:36:54 pm
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by Dave Gardner on Jul 18, 2008 at 4:06:34 am
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by Sjon Ueckert on Jul 18, 2008 at 7:28:24 pm
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by Dave Gardner on Jul 18, 2008 at 9:51:39 pm
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by Sjon Ueckert on Jul 18, 2008 at 9:59:16 pm
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by Chaz Hub on Nov 3, 2011 at 1:08:25 am
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by Sjon Ueckert on Feb 11, 2008 at 8:22:31 pm
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by Mark Palmos on Feb 11, 2008 at 11:14:00 pm
Re: horrid quality compared to FCP basic text?
by mark in Chapel Hill on Feb 11, 2008 at 11:21:00 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]