Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
FORUMS:listlist (w/ descriptions)archivetagssearchhall of famerecent posts

Re: Not understanding professional resolutions

COW Forums : Cinematography

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Kevin CannonRe: Not understanding professional resolutions
by on Mar 10, 2011 at 11:12:35 pm

No need to guesstimate - the Arri study at the top of the thread measures the ideal 35mm exposure on a 200 ASA stock, saying that the smallest resolvable detail is .006mm large on the negative...

Super 16mm is 12.35mm x 7.42mm or 2058 x 1237 "points"
Super 35mm is 24.92mm x 18.67 or 4153 x 3112 "points"
65mm is 52.48mm x 23.01 mm or 8746 x 3835 "points"

and Imax would be 69.95mm x 52.48mm (if the aspect ratio is 1.5 on the neg) so something like 13119 x 8746 "points".

but since the grains move around, the digital grid should be twice as fine... so 20k is an overestimate for 35mm film, but there's definitely a difference between 4K, 8K, and potentially 10K scans...

But my understanding is that digital IMAX projection is just two 2K projectors overlapping...so certainly not an equivalent to IMAX film projection...

KC

prehistoricdigital.com
hardworkingpixels.com


Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:




LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINESTOCKYARDVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]