SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX Techniques
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by
David Lawrence
on Sep 24, 2011 at 6:55:47 pm
[Steve Connor]
"What do you need keywords to be able to do?"
Here's an example -
My typical FCP7 logging workflow is:
1) import clips to appropriate bins
2) skim/JKL thru each interview or dialogue clip in browser adding color-coded markers with log comments
3) drop marked clips on timeline and begin cutting.
I can imagine a FCPX preflight workflow something like this:
1) import clips to event
2) separate interviews/dialogue and b-roll with keywords
3) skim/JKL thru each interview or dialogue clip marking favorite clip ranges with log comments
Then I'd just need a translation utility that would covert keyword groupings into bins and favorite clip ranges into markers with duration and export as XML so I can cut with tools I'm faster and more comfortable with.
This would be especially useful in field-based and quick turn-around situations, but I can also imagine using it as a general logging scenario. I think it plays to FCPX's current strengths and benefits.
_______________________
David Lawrence
art~media~design~research
propaganda.com
publicmattersgroup.com
facebook.com/dlawrence
twitter.com/dhl
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
Roles: got 'em to work.
by Mark Morache on Sep 21, 2011 at 6:50:08 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 21, 2011 at 7:16:36 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Fabien Daguerre on Sep 21, 2011 at 10:05:31 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Craig Seeman on Sep 21, 2011 at 12:07:27 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 21, 2011 at 1:41:11 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Craig Seeman on Sep 21, 2011 at 12:14:52 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 21, 2011 at 1:12:49 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Craig Seeman on Sep 21, 2011 at 5:19:41 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 21, 2011 at 5:59:28 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Craig Seeman on Sep 21, 2011 at 6:24:29 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 21, 2011 at 1:23:12 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 21, 2011 at 1:37:51 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 21, 2011 at 2:03:40 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by greg gilpatrick on Sep 21, 2011 at 3:08:14 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 21, 2011 at 3:13:38 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by David Battistella on Sep 21, 2011 at 3:32:38 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by greg gilpatrick on Sep 21, 2011 at 3:49:48 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 21, 2011 at 3:58:43 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by David Battistella on Sep 21, 2011 at 4:03:23 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 21, 2011 at 4:11:16 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Lance Moody on Sep 21, 2011 at 3:35:28 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 21, 2011 at 6:03:01 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 21, 2011 at 7:35:56 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 21, 2011 at 7:55:38 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Craig Seeman on Sep 21, 2011 at 8:08:25 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 21, 2011 at 8:20:08 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Mark Morache on Sep 23, 2011 at 8:46:06 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 23, 2011 at 8:50:14 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 21, 2011 at 8:13:30 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 21, 2011 at 8:53:29 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by David Lawrence on Sep 21, 2011 at 9:55:46 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 22, 2011 at 4:09:27 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 21, 2011 at 10:15:19 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Craig Seeman on Sep 22, 2011 at 5:16:53 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by David Lawrence on Sep 22, 2011 at 6:52:41 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Craig Seeman on Sep 22, 2011 at 7:18:23 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 22, 2011 at 9:03:47 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 22, 2011 at 8:00:10 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Craig Seeman on Sep 22, 2011 at 4:08:25 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 23, 2011 at 11:18:33 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by David Lawrence on Sep 23, 2011 at 6:56:52 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 23, 2011 at 7:13:08 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Craig Seeman on Sep 23, 2011 at 7:32:07 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 23, 2011 at 7:40:50 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Craig Seeman on Sep 23, 2011 at 7:56:28 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Chris Harlan on Sep 24, 2011 at 5:30:42 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 24, 2011 at 9:59:10 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Chris Harlan on Sep 24, 2011 at 3:34:55 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 24, 2011 at 5:41:31 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by David Lawrence on Sep 24, 2011 at 6:15:05 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Steve Connor on Sep 24, 2011 at 6:20:10 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by David Lawrence on Sep 24, 2011 at 6:55:47 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Steve Connor on Sep 24, 2011 at 7:05:04 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 24, 2011 at 8:00:59 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Craig Seeman on Sep 24, 2011 at 9:33:59 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by David Lawrence on Sep 24, 2011 at 10:12:46 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 23, 2011 at 7:38:55 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 23, 2011 at 7:48:34 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 23, 2011 at 8:17:56 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 23, 2011 at 8:33:52 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 23, 2011 at 8:51:57 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 23, 2011 at 8:39:43 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 23, 2011 at 8:51:29 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 26, 2011 at 12:20:29 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 26, 2011 at 5:18:59 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 26, 2011 at 5:36:57 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Mark Morache on Sep 26, 2011 at 5:43:13 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 26, 2011 at 5:45:23 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 26, 2011 at 6:09:14 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Mark Morache on Sep 23, 2011 at 8:33:00 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 22, 2011 at 5:28:40 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 22, 2011 at 6:33:49 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 22, 2011 at 6:42:52 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 22, 2011 at 7:36:59 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 22, 2011 at 7:56:57 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 22, 2011 at 8:10:41 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 22, 2011 at 4:20:21 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 22, 2011 at 4:19:28 pm
Why roles seems like a stop-gap
by Mark Morache on Sep 22, 2011 at 7:58:04 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by alban egger on Sep 21, 2011 at 9:12:27 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Michael Gissing on Sep 22, 2011 at 11:28:07 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 23, 2011 at 12:00:06 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Michael Gissing on Sep 23, 2011 at 12:56:04 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 23, 2011 at 1:04:41 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Michael Gissing on Sep 23, 2011 at 1:11:57 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 23, 2011 at 1:23:28 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Craig Seeman on Sep 23, 2011 at 1:36:07 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Michael Gissing on Sep 23, 2011 at 1:45:45 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 23, 2011 at 1:56:37 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Simon Ubsdell on Sep 23, 2011 at 12:32:55 pm
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Erik Krisch on Sep 23, 2011 at 12:22:45 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Michael Gissing on Sep 23, 2011 at 1:03:33 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 23, 2011 at 1:11:52 am
Re: Roles: got 'em to work.
by Liam Hall on Sep 23, 2011 at 12:08:03 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2012
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]