SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Risk and failure
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Risk and failure
by
Mike Parfit
on Jul 1, 2011 at 5:17:08 pm
It's always bothered me that we -- humans in general -- have a hard time accepting that stunning creative risks, which are so highly praised when they succeed, are inevitably accompanied by occasions of stunning failure.
Apple has always seemed to be a risk-taking company. One assumes that most of the failures are hidden in the folds of the company's legendary cloak. But now one has emerged into light it should probably never have seen.
All of us in this business, who either engage in attempts at creativity ourselves or spend our lives trying to shepherd it -- or both -- should be able to recognize this phenomenon in this case. So should Apple. It's part of the territory. It just requires a rapid and complete recovery, and that's what the best creative people know how to do. Not without anguish, but without hesitation.
From all the evidence -- Apple's efforts to court the pros, its touting of FCPX as a professional tool, the new FAQs -- Apple is not actively trying to abandon us. It's more likely the FCP team believed FCPX was a daring, glorious risk. But it seems clear now that it is a failure. The capable users it should have challenged and thrilled are disappointed and feel betrayed. FCP1 opened doors; FCPX in many ways appears to close them. It is not the creative breakthrough that its team expected. I suspect there is pain.
I've been lucky enough to know some effective creative people, and that pain is common, even among the best. From what I've seen the only way they get through those failures is to acknowledge them honestly and get past the inevitable defensive mode into recovery. In film and writing it's either wholesale revision or abandonment of the project altogether. A reputation often depends on whether that recovery effort is forthright or truculent.
So the main question seems to be whether Apple is willing to accept this failure and acknowledge it quickly enough to recover and advance. From what I have seen of that kind of acceptance, it helps define the flexibility and persistence that marks the most genuinely creative of individuals. Because, painful or not, the acceptance of failure can offer insights and breakthroughs that success doesn't.
The question is just whether Apple still has enough creative spirit in this field to accept the short-term embarrassment of acknowledging failure in order to continue seeking long-term achievement, or just moves away from the terrors of creativity into the safer but sadder path of mediocrity.
Good luck to everyone.
Mike
http://www.thewhalemovie.com
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
+2
Current Message Thread:
Risk and failure
by Mike Parfit on Jul 1, 2011 at 5:17:08 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Ted Levy on Jul 1, 2011 at 5:38:16 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 6:13:31 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Peter Steinberg on Jul 1, 2011 at 6:24:19 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Paul Dickin on Jul 1, 2011 at 6:28:47 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by John Chay on Jul 1, 2011 at 6:32:34 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Andrew Stone on Jul 1, 2011 at 6:34:11 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Paul Dickin on Jul 1, 2011 at 6:40:36 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 6:48:39 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Jerry Vogt on Jul 1, 2011 at 7:43:09 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 7:58:33 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by james carey on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:10:46 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:51:10 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Julian Bowman on Jul 4, 2011 at 12:43:50 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 4, 2011 at 1:46:36 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Julian Bowman on Jul 4, 2011 at 2:11:58 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 4, 2011 at 2:19:54 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Julian Bowman on Jul 4, 2011 at 2:26:40 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Walter Soyka on Jul 5, 2011 at 5:11:26 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 5, 2011 at 5:40:18 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by David Roth Weiss on Jul 1, 2011 at 7:30:06 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 1, 2011 at 7:37:21 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:56:04 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by David Roth Weiss on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:38:00 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:45:23 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 1, 2011 at 10:01:18 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Harlan on Jul 1, 2011 at 11:09:13 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Alex Hawkins on Jul 2, 2011 at 11:53:42 am
Re: Risk and failure
by Alan Okey on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:21:08 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Buddy Couch on Jul 1, 2011 at 10:34:52 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Alex Hawkins on Jul 2, 2011 at 11:50:25 am
Re: Risk and failure
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 1, 2011 at 6:34:41 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 7:20:29 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 1, 2011 at 7:33:46 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Paul Dickin on Jul 1, 2011 at 7:55:53 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:01:49 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Marvin Holdman on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:23:07 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:29:16 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Marvin Holdman on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:47:56 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:52:36 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Marvin Holdman on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:14:56 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by james carey on Jul 1, 2011 at 10:04:14 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Richard Boyd on Jul 2, 2011 at 5:33:28 am
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 2, 2011 at 11:07:40 am
Re: Risk and failure
by Walter Soyka on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:30:20 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Simon Ubsdell on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:38:04 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Matt Callac on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:52:19 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Simon Ubsdell on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:00:55 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Matt Callac on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:07:35 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Walter Soyka on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:29:27 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Matt Callac on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:48:51 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:43:57 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:48:30 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Simon Ubsdell on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:56:35 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:36:47 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 1, 2011 at 10:16:17 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:59:25 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:03:12 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:07:30 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by John Chay on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:08:04 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Gary Pollard on Jul 2, 2011 at 1:40:50 am
Re: Risk and failure
by David Roth Weiss on Jul 2, 2011 at 2:05:30 am
Re: Risk and failure
by Gary Pollard on Jul 2, 2011 at 2:28:52 am
Re: Risk and failure
by David Roth Weiss on Jul 2, 2011 at 2:47:36 am
Re: Risk and failure
by Gary Pollard on Jul 2, 2011 at 3:08:58 am
Re: Risk and failure
by Walter Soyka on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:21:16 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by John Chay on Jul 1, 2011 at 9:40:50 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 1, 2011 at 10:49:54 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 1, 2011 at 11:06:13 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Gary Pollard on Jul 2, 2011 at 1:48:26 am
Re: Risk and failure
by Walter Soyka on Jul 2, 2011 at 2:26:17 am
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 2, 2011 at 11:04:41 am
Re: Risk and failure
by Walter Soyka on Jul 2, 2011 at 12:59:25 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Andrew Richards on Jul 2, 2011 at 1:24:35 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 2, 2011 at 1:35:04 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Walter Soyka on Jul 2, 2011 at 2:33:08 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 2, 2011 at 4:44:49 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Andrew Richards on Jul 2, 2011 at 8:02:10 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 2, 2011 at 8:35:22 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Walter Soyka on Jul 3, 2011 at 1:35:03 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Chris Kenny on Jul 3, 2011 at 1:55:21 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Andrew Richards on Jul 2, 2011 at 1:03:57 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Walter Soyka on Jul 2, 2011 at 3:02:30 am
Re: Risk and failure
by james carey on Jul 1, 2011 at 10:10:52 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Buddy Couch on Jul 1, 2011 at 11:07:13 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Nelson Torres on Jul 1, 2011 at 8:17:49 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Mark Suszko on Jul 1, 2011 at 10:22:28 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Ben Holmes on Jul 1, 2011 at 11:07:10 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Paul Dickin on Jul 1, 2011 at 11:15:44 pm
Re: Risk and failure
by Douglas Morse on Jul 2, 2011 at 2:18:25 am
Re: Risk and failure
by Peter Corbett on Jul 2, 2011 at 4:53:10 am
Re: Risk and failure
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 2, 2011 at 12:37:12 pm
Is it really a failure?
by Mike Parfit on Jul 1, 2011 at 10:43:39 pm
Re: Is it really a failure?
by Paul Dickin on Jul 1, 2011 at 10:52:16 pm
Re: Is it really a failure?
by Chris Jacek on Jul 2, 2011 at 4:50:15 am
Re: Is it really a failure?
by Chris Takimoto on Jul 4, 2011 at 2:02:22 pm
Re: Is it really a failure?
by David Roth Weiss on Jul 1, 2011 at 11:03:01 pm
Re: Is it really a failure?
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 1, 2011 at 11:49:40 pm
Re: Is it really a failure?
by David Roth Weiss on Jul 2, 2011 at 12:16:35 am
Re: Is it really a failure?
by Aindreas Gallagher on Jul 2, 2011 at 1:05:19 am
Re: Is it really a failure?
by Andrew Corneles on Jul 2, 2011 at 4:53:43 am
Re: Is it really a failure?
by Robert Brown on Jul 2, 2011 at 5:02:37 am
Re: Is it really a failure?
by Ben Holmes on Jul 2, 2011 at 5:53:43 am
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2012
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]