SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: Tedious track based editing
COW Forums
:
Corel Design/Video Tools
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: Tedious track based editing
by
Jeremy Garchow
on Sep 11, 2012 at 1:58:09 am
[Aindreas Gallagher]
"I can actually answer this - if you grab an edit point for a ripple trim pushing against timeline start - it actually sucks timeline start against you. timeline start is magnetic. no. i"m not kidding - its that stupid.
the default behaviour of FCPX is that time is relative to your current decision - you can suck time start absolute left against you.
again - I'm not joking - this is the degree to which they smoked special cigarettes in cupertino - in the process of destroying a decade industry standard."
I know it's a work around but the ultimate outcome is exactly the same as rippling in FCP7.
Even though I agree that the animation is executed poorly, ripple trimming 3 seconds off the head of FCPX is the same as ripple trimming 3 seconds off of the head of FCP7. X just chooses to show you the warm up area before the starting line.
I'm not making excuses as the animation is stupid and rather unnecessary. Shift-z rights the sinking ship.
Zero tc is still zero tc.
On the flip side of that, if you make a trim and you cannot see zero, the time marker stays right in the middle, so that you don't have to hunt for it, the active area has remained conveniently in the same place.
I know, you are completely done with FCPX, but there is a reason for this animation when you can't see zero.
This is especially apparent when you use the keyboard to trim.
I don't know why I keep pushing this water uphill.
Jeremy
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
Tedious track based editing
by craig slattery on Sep 7, 2012 at 11:58:35 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by H Spencer Young on Sep 8, 2012 at 12:23:07 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Michael Gissing on Sep 8, 2012 at 12:32:40 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by craig slattery on Sep 8, 2012 at 1:01:19 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Rafael Amador on Sep 8, 2012 at 2:27:39 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by andy lewis on Sep 8, 2012 at 5:13:52 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Mark Dobson on Sep 8, 2012 at 7:14:33 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 10, 2012 at 7:07:35 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Steve Connor on Sep 10, 2012 at 7:54:09 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 10, 2012 at 11:15:45 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by craig slattery on Sep 10, 2012 at 9:13:28 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Chris Harlan on Sep 10, 2012 at 2:42:14 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by craig slattery on Sep 10, 2012 at 2:57:57 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Chris Harlan on Sep 10, 2012 at 3:33:22 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by craig slattery on Sep 8, 2012 at 8:25:02 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by craig slattery on Sep 8, 2012 at 7:41:50 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 8, 2012 at 7:58:27 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by andy lewis on Sep 8, 2012 at 8:24:45 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Mark Dobson on Sep 8, 2012 at 8:58:47 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 8, 2012 at 4:40:38 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 8, 2012 at 5:45:47 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 8, 2012 at 6:46:01 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Dominic Deacon on Sep 8, 2012 at 10:35:04 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 8, 2012 at 11:02:33 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Chris Harlan on Sep 8, 2012 at 11:09:04 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 8, 2012 at 11:05:14 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Michael Aranyshev on Sep 10, 2012 at 8:49:40 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by craig slattery on Sep 8, 2012 at 8:26:54 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Herb Sevush on Sep 8, 2012 at 10:43:54 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jim Giberti on Sep 10, 2012 at 2:00:04 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Cherniack on Sep 10, 2012 at 2:10:45 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Chris Harlan on Sep 10, 2012 at 4:05:35 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Chris Harlan on Sep 8, 2012 at 11:08:12 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Michael Sanders on Sep 8, 2012 at 8:37:21 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Andy Field on Sep 8, 2012 at 9:26:38 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Michael Sanders on Sep 8, 2012 at 9:28:09 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Michael Sanders on Sep 8, 2012 at 9:28:58 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Rafael Amador on Sep 8, 2012 at 10:45:58 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by craig slattery on Sep 8, 2012 at 12:23:40 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by craig slattery on Sep 8, 2012 at 12:35:23 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Bob Woodhead on Sep 8, 2012 at 12:53:35 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by craig slattery on Sep 8, 2012 at 1:15:26 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Rafael Amador on Sep 8, 2012 at 2:03:16 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 8, 2012 at 2:21:16 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by craig slattery on Sep 8, 2012 at 6:59:19 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by tony west on Sep 8, 2012 at 3:29:05 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 9, 2012 at 3:42:23 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by tony west on Sep 9, 2012 at 12:13:52 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 9, 2012 at 2:12:58 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 9, 2012 at 5:33:50 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 9, 2012 at 3:18:42 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 9, 2012 at 4:39:52 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Andy Field on Sep 9, 2012 at 11:47:40 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 8, 2012 at 2:20:13 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 8, 2012 at 5:53:11 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 9, 2012 at 2:46:35 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by tony west on Sep 9, 2012 at 12:33:39 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Richard Cardonna on Sep 9, 2012 at 1:04:39 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 9, 2012 at 1:35:25 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Richard Cardonna on Sep 9, 2012 at 2:17:14 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 9, 2012 at 6:58:22 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 10, 2012 at 4:06:23 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 10, 2012 at 12:40:07 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 10, 2012 at 1:20:00 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 10, 2012 at 3:07:23 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 10, 2012 at 5:48:11 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 10, 2012 at 6:18:44 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 10, 2012 at 6:35:49 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 10, 2012 at 7:11:23 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 10, 2012 at 8:20:51 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 10, 2012 at 8:33:51 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 10, 2012 at 8:59:08 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Steve Connor on Sep 10, 2012 at 9:13:45 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Steve Connor on Sep 10, 2012 at 9:15:57 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 10, 2012 at 9:24:49 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Steve Connor on Sep 10, 2012 at 9:29:55 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 10, 2012 at 10:24:49 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 10, 2012 at 10:41:01 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 10, 2012 at 10:53:47 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 10, 2012 at 11:30:02 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 10, 2012 at 10:56:35 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 10, 2012 at 11:21:08 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 11, 2012 at 12:22:52 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 11, 2012 at 12:47:02 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 11, 2012 at 12:57:52 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 11, 2012 at 1:03:55 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Steve Connor on Sep 11, 2012 at 6:39:57 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by craig slattery on Sep 11, 2012 at 8:40:19 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 10, 2012 at 11:05:46 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 10, 2012 at 5:54:50 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 10, 2012 at 6:06:10 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 10, 2012 at 6:14:19 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 11, 2012 at 12:58:56 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 11, 2012 at 1:58:09 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 11, 2012 at 7:08:56 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 11, 2012 at 4:54:25 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 11, 2012 at 5:48:35 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 11, 2012 at 6:16:53 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Steve Connor on Sep 11, 2012 at 7:00:27 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 11, 2012 at 7:13:36 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 11, 2012 at 7:19:25 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Steve Connor on Sep 11, 2012 at 7:26:42 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 11, 2012 at 8:01:20 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 11, 2012 at 10:29:13 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 11, 2012 at 11:00:32 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 11, 2012 at 11:59:55 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 12, 2012 at 12:39:54 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 12, 2012 at 12:53:05 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 11, 2012 at 10:44:45 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 11, 2012 at 11:01:23 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 11, 2012 at 11:32:23 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 11, 2012 at 8:03:38 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Steve Connor on Sep 11, 2012 at 7:23:14 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 11, 2012 at 9:05:59 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 11, 2012 at 10:48:59 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 12:03:55 am
Re: Tedious track based editing - let's talk about relationships
by David Lawrence on Sep 12, 2012 at 1:19:17 am
Re: Tedious track based editing - let's talk about relationships
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 1:40:59 am
Re: Tedious track based editing - let's talk about relationships
by David Lawrence on Sep 12, 2012 at 9:26:42 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing - let's talk about relationships
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 12, 2012 at 9:39:14 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing - let's talk about relationships
by David Lawrence on Sep 12, 2012 at 10:14:02 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing - let's talk about relationships
by Walter Soyka on Sep 14, 2012 at 1:41:17 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing - let's talk about relationships
by David Lawrence on Sep 14, 2012 at 7:40:31 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing - let's talk about relationships
by Steve Connor on Sep 14, 2012 at 7:49:37 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing - let's talk about relationships
by David Lawrence on Sep 15, 2012 at 1:04:50 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 14, 2012 at 1:53:56 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 14, 2012 at 6:44:48 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 14, 2012 at 7:53:25 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 14, 2012 at 8:04:16 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 14, 2012 at 8:37:09 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Aindreas Gallagher on Sep 14, 2012 at 11:40:26 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 15, 2012 at 1:44:47 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Steve Connor on Sep 15, 2012 at 11:17:37 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Steve Connor on Sep 11, 2012 at 6:51:22 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 11, 2012 at 7:05:48 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Steve Connor on Sep 11, 2012 at 7:32:26 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 11, 2012 at 7:53:53 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Steve Connor on Sep 11, 2012 at 8:00:56 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 11, 2012 at 8:10:26 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by tony west on Sep 11, 2012 at 1:47:35 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 11, 2012 at 2:35:39 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by tony west on Sep 11, 2012 at 3:00:13 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 11, 2012 at 3:51:27 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Herb Sevush on Sep 11, 2012 at 4:53:58 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 11, 2012 at 5:01:09 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Herb Sevush on Sep 11, 2012 at 5:07:28 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 11, 2012 at 5:40:26 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Herb Sevush on Sep 11, 2012 at 7:08:17 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Walter Soyka on Sep 11, 2012 at 4:28:03 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 11, 2012 at 4:08:09 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 11, 2012 at 4:17:56 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 11, 2012 at 2:41:41 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by tony west on Sep 11, 2012 at 2:55:48 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 11, 2012 at 4:20:05 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 11, 2012 at 4:54:46 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 11, 2012 at 9:33:34 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 11, 2012 at 10:23:58 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 11, 2012 at 11:17:24 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 11, 2012 at 11:58:47 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by tony west on Sep 12, 2012 at 5:07:24 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by David Lawrence on Sep 12, 2012 at 5:18:27 am
Re: Tedious track based editing
by tony west on Sep 12, 2012 at 1:17:14 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 12, 2012 at 1:33:15 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 2:20:55 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 12, 2012 at 2:41:07 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 3:08:43 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 12, 2012 at 3:28:01 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 3:43:03 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 12, 2012 at 3:57:30 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 3:59:09 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:00:32 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:07:51 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:25:13 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:09:36 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Herb Sevush on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:15:48 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:36:59 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Herb Sevush on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:50:56 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:58:38 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Herb Sevush on Sep 12, 2012 at 5:16:41 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 6:38:50 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Herb Sevush on Sep 12, 2012 at 6:43:39 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 6:51:53 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Herb Sevush on Sep 12, 2012 at 7:49:19 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 12, 2012 at 7:20:57 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 12, 2012 at 5:20:51 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 12, 2012 at 5:12:02 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Herb Sevush on Sep 12, 2012 at 5:26:49 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 12, 2012 at 5:36:34 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 12, 2012 at 5:45:13 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 12, 2012 at 5:51:25 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Franz Bieberkopf on Sep 12, 2012 at 5:59:42 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 12, 2012 at 6:20:30 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:22:51 pm
RE: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:43:27 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Herb Sevush on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:00:11 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:42:51 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Herb Sevush on Sep 12, 2012 at 4:56:09 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 12, 2012 at 2:39:15 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Oliver Peters on Sep 12, 2012 at 6:31:41 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Craig Seeman on Sep 12, 2012 at 6:42:41 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Jeremy Garchow on Sep 12, 2012 at 6:44:53 pm
Re: Tedious track based editing
by Chris Harlan on Sep 12, 2012 at 8:14:47 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]