Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:HomeFCP ForumFCP XFCPX TechniquesFCP TutorialsFC ServerBasics ForumTrainingPodcastFAQ

Re: FCP X hardware performance

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Oliver PetersRe: FCP X hardware performance
by on Jun 9, 2012 at 2:01:34 pm

As a follow-up to this test, I've plugged a Quadro 4000 into my 8-core MP. When I did the tests in the original post, I was using the ATI 5870. The 4000 has twice as much VRAM. Render/export is similar to what I had been getting. About 7 1/2 min. for a :65 HD clip with MB Looks applied, versus 8+ with the ATI. However, playback performance in the FCP X UI with these effects applied, but unrendered, is a bit better. More fps (visually) and better skimming. Accessing the external interfaces for filters like Sapphire Edge and Tiffen DFX seems like there is better response with the presets inside those custom interfaces. Otherwise fine, though I did have a crash on close that seems to be related to accessing a CUDA library plug-ins. I believe that some of these third party filters use CUDA acceleration when available, which might cause some conflicts with X.

- Oliver

Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com


Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
+1
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:




LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINESTOCKYARDVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]