SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: FCP X hardware performance
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by
Oliver Peters
on Jun 9, 2012 at 2:01:34 pm
As a follow-up to this test, I've plugged a Quadro 4000 into my 8-core MP. When I did the tests in the original post, I was using the ATI 5870. The 4000 has twice as much VRAM. Render/export is similar to what I had been getting. About 7 1/2 min. for a :65 HD clip with MB Looks applied, versus 8+ with the ATI. However, playback performance in the FCP X UI with these effects applied, but unrendered, is a bit better. More fps (visually) and better skimming. Accessing the external interfaces for filters like Sapphire Edge and Tiffen DFX seems like there is better response with the presets inside those custom interfaces. Otherwise fine, though I did have a crash on close that seems to be related to accessing a CUDA library plug-ins. I believe that some of these third party filters use CUDA acceleration when available, which might cause some conflicts with X.
- Oliver
Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
+1
Current Message Thread:
FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:04:45 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by olof ekbergh on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:18:45 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:41:44 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:10:58 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:54:27 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Bill Davis on Jun 3, 2012 at 1:01:39 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 3, 2012 at 1:49:03 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Bill Davis on Jun 3, 2012 at 2:02:22 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Hadley on Jun 4, 2012 at 1:20:05 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Chris Harlan on Jun 4, 2012 at 3:42:35 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Elias Huch on Jun 28, 2012 at 2:20:18 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Timothy Palmer-Benson on Jun 4, 2012 at 12:51:44 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Mathieu Ghekiere on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:30:47 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:58:15 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 4:19:21 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 4:25:05 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 5:35:46 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 6:05:14 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 6:11:48 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:04:29 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:16:35 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by David Cherniack on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:26:09 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Lance Bachelder on Jun 4, 2012 at 2:16:19 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:16:59 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Lance Bachelder on Jun 6, 2012 at 12:13:12 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by David Cherniack on Jun 7, 2012 at 9:47:21 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:35:48 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 9:39:24 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Bret Williams on Jun 2, 2012 at 11:27:14 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 11:50:31 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 11:52:40 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 3, 2012 at 12:44:32 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Bernard Newnham on Jun 3, 2012 at 9:29:33 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 5:13:08 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 4, 2012 at 6:11:42 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 6:39:48 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 7:00:19 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 7:36:23 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:25:03 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:58:29 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 9:24:06 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 9:38:55 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 10:13:47 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 10:56:24 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Steve Connor on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:05:47 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:16:52 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 12:52:13 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:08:34 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 12:16:49 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 5, 2012 at 5:39:10 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 4:11:34 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 5, 2012 at 5:56:29 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 6:47:31 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Steve Connor on Jun 3, 2012 at 6:58:36 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:02:30 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:05:32 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:07:54 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:31:44 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Mathieu Ghekiere on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:22:52 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:31:54 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 9, 2012 at 2:01:34 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]