SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: FCP X hardware performance
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by
Lance Bachelder
on Jun 6, 2012 at 12:13:12 am
Yes the 32 bit thing was just for Premiere since there is a checkbox to use highest bit depth. FCPX is using much more than just 32 bit float as you mentioned and the results are the best I've sen from an NLE. When I cut in Vegas I leave it in 8 bit mode for speed then switch to 32 bit float for color timing and final render - even if it's an 8 bit render such as DVD the results are better with the switch though the render times skyrocket.
Lance Bachelder
Writer, Editor, Director
Irvine, California
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:04:45 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by olof ekbergh on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:18:45 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:41:44 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:10:58 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:54:27 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Bill Davis on Jun 3, 2012 at 1:01:39 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 3, 2012 at 1:49:03 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Bill Davis on Jun 3, 2012 at 2:02:22 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Hadley on Jun 4, 2012 at 1:20:05 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Chris Harlan on Jun 4, 2012 at 3:42:35 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Elias Huch on Jun 28, 2012 at 2:20:18 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Timothy Palmer-Benson on Jun 4, 2012 at 12:51:44 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Mathieu Ghekiere on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:30:47 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:58:15 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 4:19:21 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 4:25:05 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 5:35:46 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 6:05:14 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 6:11:48 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:04:29 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:16:35 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by David Cherniack on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:26:09 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Lance Bachelder on Jun 4, 2012 at 2:16:19 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:16:59 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Lance Bachelder on Jun 6, 2012 at 12:13:12 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by David Cherniack on Jun 7, 2012 at 9:47:21 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:35:48 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 9:39:24 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Bret Williams on Jun 2, 2012 at 11:27:14 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 11:50:31 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 11:52:40 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 3, 2012 at 12:44:32 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Bernard Newnham on Jun 3, 2012 at 9:29:33 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 5:13:08 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 4, 2012 at 6:11:42 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 6:39:48 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 7:00:19 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 7:36:23 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:25:03 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:58:29 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 9:24:06 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 9:38:55 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 10:13:47 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 10:56:24 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Steve Connor on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:05:47 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:16:52 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 12:52:13 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:08:34 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 12:16:49 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 5, 2012 at 5:39:10 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 4:11:34 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 5, 2012 at 5:56:29 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 6:47:31 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Steve Connor on Jun 3, 2012 at 6:58:36 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:02:30 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:05:32 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:07:54 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:31:44 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Mathieu Ghekiere on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:22:52 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:31:54 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 9, 2012 at 2:01:34 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]