Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
FORUMSTUTORIALSFEATURESVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:HomeFCP ForumFCP XFCPX TechniquesFCP TutorialsFC ServerBasics ForumPodcastFAQ

Re: FCP X hardware performance

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Frank GothmannRe: FCP X hardware performance
by on Jun 4, 2012 at 7:00:19 pm

[Jeremy Garchow] "But does it really go faster? Sure, for some things I'm sure it does, but do you have tests on this sort of thing? What editor setup XGrid? QMaster is very hard to mange when using multiple machines. It does work well on single machines (virtual cluster), but it is for one application, Compressor. It used to be for Shake. FCP Legend doesn't use it, and X only uses it when using Compressor. How does it help me when I'm Ae or any other application that is relying mostly on CPU cycles?"

Errr... you can use Qmaster to distribute render jobs for AE. Also for Nuke rendering. And it speeds things up significantly.

------
"You also agree that you will not use these products for... the development, design, manufacture or production of nuclear, missiles, or chemical or biological weapons."
iTunes End User Licence Agreement


Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:



LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMS • TUTORIALS • FEATURES • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]