Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ADVERTISING :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
Creative COW's LinkedIn GroupCreative COW's Facebook PageCreative COW on TwitterCreative COW's Google+ PageCreative COW on YouTube
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:HomeFCP ForumFCP XFCPX TechniquesFCP TutorialsFC ServerBasics ForumTrainingPodcastFAQ

Re: FCP X hardware performance

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL   •   ADD A NEW POST   •   PRINT
Share on Facebook
Respond to this post   •   Return to posts index   •   Read entire thread


Oliver PetersRe: FCP X hardware performance
by on Jun 2, 2012 at 9:39:24 pm

[Craig Seeman] "I am wondering how an i7 and Xeon of the same vintage compares though."

Well, if you look back at the tests I ran, The 12-core MP and the iMac are fairly close in vintage.

[Craig Seeman] "without going into all the details, FCP7 was faster"

I've done similar tests and seen similar results.

[Craig Seeman] "For example, would expect an 8 Core 3GHz Xeon 2006 MacPro to be faster than a 4 Core 2.8GHz i7 2011 iMac since 2006 MacPro has higher GHz and more cores? "

I think speed and cores per processor matter. In other words I have a sneaking feeling that you aren't getter double the bang just because you have two chips instead of one.

[Craig Seeman] "I might guess that the 2011 iMac would be faster (at least with regards to many FCPX functions) because of the improvements in the new i7 processors compared to 5 year old Xeons."

I would agree. I think in the case of FCP X specifically, the GPU is a huge factor.

- Oliver

Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com


Posts IndexRead Thread
Reply   Like  
Share on Facebook


Current Message Thread:




LOGIN TO REPLY



FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINESTOCKYARDVIDEOSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

Creative COW LinkedIn Group Creative COW Facebook Page Creative COW on Twitter
© 2013 CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved. - Privacy Policy

[Top]