SIGN IN
::
SPONSORS
::
ADVERTISING
::
ABOUT US
::
CONTACT US
FORUMS
TUTORIALS
MAGAZINE
STOCKYARD
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
EVENTS
SERVICES
NEWSLETTER
NEWS
BLOGS
APPLE FINAL CUT PRO:
Home
FCP Forum
FCP X
FCPX Techniques
FCP Tutorials
FC Server
Basics Forum
Training
Podcast
FAQ
Re: FCP X hardware performance
COW Forums
:
Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate
VIEW ALL
•
ADD A NEW POST
•
PRINT
Respond to this post
•
Return to posts index
•
Read entire thread
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by
Oliver Peters
on Jun 2, 2012 at 9:39:24 pm
[Craig Seeman]
"I am wondering how an i7 and Xeon of the same vintage compares though."
Well, if you look back at the tests I ran, The 12-core MP and the iMac are fairly close in vintage.
[Craig Seeman]
"without going into all the details, FCP7 was faster"
I've done similar tests and seen similar results.
[Craig Seeman]
"For example, would expect an 8 Core 3GHz Xeon 2006 MacPro to be faster than a 4 Core 2.8GHz i7 2011 iMac since 2006 MacPro has higher GHz and more cores? "
I think speed and cores per processor matter. In other words I have a sneaking feeling that you aren't getter double the bang just because you have two chips instead of one.
[Craig Seeman]
"I might guess that the 2011 iMac would be faster (at least with regards to many FCPX functions) because of the improvements in the new i7 processors compared to 5 year old Xeons."
I would agree. I think in the case of FCP X specifically, the GPU is a huge factor.
- Oliver
Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com
Posts Index
Read Thread
Reply
Like
Current Message Thread:
FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:04:45 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by olof ekbergh on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:18:45 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:41:44 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:10:58 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:54:27 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Bill Davis on Jun 3, 2012 at 1:01:39 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 3, 2012 at 1:49:03 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Bill Davis on Jun 3, 2012 at 2:02:22 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Hadley on Jun 4, 2012 at 1:20:05 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Chris Harlan on Jun 4, 2012 at 3:42:35 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Elias Huch on Jun 28, 2012 at 2:20:18 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Timothy Palmer-Benson on Jun 4, 2012 at 12:51:44 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Mathieu Ghekiere on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:30:47 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:58:15 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 4:19:21 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 4:25:05 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 5:35:46 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 6:05:14 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 6:11:48 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:04:29 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:16:35 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by David Cherniack on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:26:09 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Lance Bachelder on Jun 4, 2012 at 2:16:19 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:16:59 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Lance Bachelder on Jun 6, 2012 at 12:13:12 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by David Cherniack on Jun 7, 2012 at 9:47:21 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:35:48 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 9:39:24 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Bret Williams on Jun 2, 2012 at 11:27:14 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 11:50:31 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 11:52:40 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 3, 2012 at 12:44:32 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Bernard Newnham on Jun 3, 2012 at 9:29:33 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 5:13:08 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 4, 2012 at 6:11:42 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 6:39:48 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 7:00:19 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 7:36:23 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:25:03 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:58:29 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 9:24:06 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 9:38:55 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 10:13:47 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 10:56:24 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Steve Connor on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:05:47 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:16:52 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 12:52:13 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:08:34 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 12:16:49 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 5, 2012 at 5:39:10 am
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 4:11:34 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Walter Soyka on Jun 5, 2012 at 5:56:29 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 6:47:31 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Steve Connor on Jun 3, 2012 at 6:58:36 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:02:30 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:05:32 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:07:54 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:31:44 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Mathieu Ghekiere on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:22:52 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Craig Seeman on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:31:54 pm
Re: FCP X hardware performance
by Oliver Peters on Jun 9, 2012 at 2:01:34 pm
LOGIN TO REPLY
FORUMS
•
TUTORIALS
•
MAGAZINE
•
STOCKYARD
•
VIDEOS
•
PODCASTS
•
EVENTS
•
SERVICES
•
NEWSLETTER
•
NEWS
•
BLOGS
© 2013
CreativeCOW.net
All rights are reserved. -
Privacy Policy
[
Top
]