Re: FCP X hardware performance

COW Forums : Apple FCPX or Not: The Debate

VIEW ALL • ADD A NEW POST • PRINT

Respond to this post • Return to posts index • Read entire thread

Re: FCP X hardware performance
by olof ekbergh on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:18:45 pm

This is very similar to my findings.

FCPX seems to really depend on new hardware to work well. I was really disappointed with how FCPX ran on my 2009 8core, this station runs FCP7 and M100 very well. But really stutters playback and has frequent beach balls from Hell when running FCPX.

Using the new iMac i7 maxed out with a TB RAID, it works very well using Matrox MX02. It helped make me start to use FCPX instead of just "testing" it.

Olof Ekbergh

Posts Index

Read Thread

Current Message Thread:

FCP X hardware performance by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:04:45 pm
- Re: FCP X hardware performance by olof ekbergh on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:18:45 pm
  - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 2:41:44 pm
    - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:10:58 pm
      - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:54:27 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Bill Davis on Jun 3, 2012 at 1:01:39 am
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Oliver Peters on Jun 3, 2012 at 1:49:03 am
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Bill Davis on Jun 3, 2012 at 2:02:22 am
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Michael Hadley on Jun 4, 2012 at 1:20:05 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Chris Harlan on Jun 4, 2012 at 3:42:35 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Elias Huch on Jun 28, 2012 at 2:20:18 pm
  - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Timothy Palmer-Benson on Jun 4, 2012 at 12:51:44 pm
- Re: FCP X hardware performance by Mathieu Ghekiere on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:30:47 pm
  - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 3:58:15 pm
  - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 4:19:21 pm
- Re: FCP X hardware performance by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 4:25:05 pm
  - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 5:35:46 pm
    - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 6:05:14 pm
- Re: FCP X hardware performance by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 6:11:48 pm
  - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:04:29 pm
    - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:16:35 pm
      - Re: FCP X hardware performance by David Cherniack on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:26:09 pm
      - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Lance Bachelder on Jun 4, 2012 at 2:16:19 am
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Walter Soyka on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:16:59 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Lance Bachelder on Jun 6, 2012 at 12:13:12 am
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by David Cherniack on Jun 7, 2012 at 9:47:21 am
    - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Craig Seeman on Jun 2, 2012 at 8:35:48 pm
      - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 9:39:24 pm
    - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Bret Williams on Jun 2, 2012 at 11:27:14 pm
      - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 11:50:31 pm
      - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Oliver Peters on Jun 2, 2012 at 11:52:40 pm
      - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Frank Gothmann on Jun 3, 2012 at 12:44:32 am
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Bernard Newnham on Jun 3, 2012 at 9:29:33 am
    - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 5:13:08 pm
      - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Walter Soyka on Jun 4, 2012 at 6:11:42 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 6:39:48 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 7:00:19 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 7:36:23 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:25:03 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:58:29 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 9:24:06 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 9:38:55 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 10:13:47 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 4, 2012 at 10:56:24 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Steve Connor on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:05:47 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Frank Gothmann on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:16:52 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 12:52:13 am
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Walter Soyka on Jun 4, 2012 at 11:08:34 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 12:16:49 am
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Walter Soyka on Jun 5, 2012 at 5:39:10 am
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Jeremy Garchow on Jun 5, 2012 at 4:11:34 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Walter Soyka on Jun 5, 2012 at 5:56:29 pm
- Re: FCP X hardware performance by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 6:47:31 pm
  - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Steve Connor on Jun 3, 2012 at 6:58:36 pm
    - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:02:30 pm
      - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Oliver Peters on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:05:32 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:07:54 pm
        Re: FCP X hardware performance by Michael Garber on Jun 3, 2012 at 7:31:44 pm
  - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Mathieu Ghekiere on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:22:52 pm
    - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Craig Seeman on Jun 4, 2012 at 8:31:54 pm
      - Re: FCP X hardware performance by Oliver Peters on Jun 9, 2012 at 2:01:34 pm


	LOGIN TO REPLY

FORUMS • TUTORIALS • MAGAZINE • STOCKYARD • VIDEOS • PODCASTS • EVENTS • SERVICES • NEWSLETTER • NEWS • BLOGS